1237
always something (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 52 points 7 months ago

Americans are goofy af "criss cross applesauce" bitch that don't even rhyme

[-] HeapOfDogs@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

Am American, I know the phrase criss cross applesauce, but have never heard it used seriously. I've always said and heard, cross legged. Years ago it was called Indian style but I haven't heard that in years.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Yeah, was Indian style as a kid in the early '90s. Little kids need some mnemonic device to literally just not fly off the face of the earth, and so that was the replacement they came up with. Cross-legged just doesn't grab a kid's attention like mashed apples.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] funkless@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

uk we say "cross legged" or "cross leggéd" if you're feeling Shakespearean

[-] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Fun fact: in Hungarian we say "Turkish sitting" (törökülés).

[-] kennismigrant@feddit.nl 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Boring fact: it's also "sit like a Turk" or "sit the Turkish way" in Russian (сидеть по-турецки).

Now I'm curious what they say in Turkish.

UPD: me and @TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee are referring to the Lotus position which is what it is called in Turkish.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 7 months ago

In German we call it "tailor's seat" (Schneidersitz).

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I'm always feeling Shakespearean

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Is this a quote? I don’t understand how it doesn’t rhyme.

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It does in an American accent, I guess

In my accent (UK), "cross" rhymes with "boss", and "sauce" rhymes with "horse". Pretty sure boss and horse don't rhyme.

[-] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

If I'm understanding correctly then the words "sauce" and "source" are indistinguishable when spoken by a brit?

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 5 points 7 months ago

Pretty much yeah!

[-] StaplesMcGee@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Source will have emphasis on the r.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Its important because if youre at the dinner table and ask for sauce wrong, mum will pass you 273,000 lines of javascript.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 7 months ago

That's borderline child abuse

[-] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nihilore@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It’s the same in Aussie English

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago

Wait, so the non-rhotic accent adds an "r" into words that don't have one? I guess all your "r"s at the ends of words need to go somewhere...

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

...which UK accent? Big place, loads of regional differences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

"Why Im I being fired, Bauss? Is it because I pronounce it 'Hoss?'"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

I need an example pronunciation of how it doesn't rhyme because the only way I can hear it in my head rhymes. I've never heard of this name for the seating method though.

load more comments (29 replies)
[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 months ago

I think that was the transitional terminology from when they used to tell kids to sit "indian style"

[-] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Ahhh yeah you can see it, there's a bit of fluff that looks like it's the right leg going over, but it's just fluff.

Owls are 90% fluff, so this checks out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago
[-] kubica@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We need to make them some prosthesic hands.

[-] lugal@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago
[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Always remember the acronym A.V.I.A.N.:

A - Birds
V - Are
I - Not
A - Real
N -
[-] FastAndBulbous@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

This is what they look like without feathers. Demon birds.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think that's a hawk.

Owls have sausage eyes, they are fixed focal length and go back into their skulls, leaving very little room for a brain.

Edit: with a reverse image search, it seems I'm not the first to say this. My guess is that this is just dodgy taxidermy - maybe it was an owl, but taxidermy is notoriously bad at eyes.

[-] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I want an owl that does this.

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Makes it look like someone in an owl suit

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1237 points (98.4% liked)

Superbowl

2916 readers
161 users here now

For owls that are superb.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS