this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
167 points (98.3% liked)

politics

25132 readers
2104 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent Orlando trial attorney John Morgan could be considered the kingmaker of Democratic-focused initiatives, having poured millions of dollars of his own money into successfully getting medical marijuana and a minimum wage increase passed.

But when it comes to the push in Florida that aims to create a right to abortion up to at least 24 weeks of pregnancy — and undo the state’s 6-week ban — Morgan said he’s not getting involved.

“I am pro-choice but this is not my fight,” he said via email when he was asked if he would come out of retirement from funding ballot initiatives.

Morgan encapsulates the problems Florida Democrats and activists face with the current abortion initiative. They want to protect access to abortion, but are struggling to fund the initiative and gather enough signatures by Feb. 1 to qualify to get it on the ballot.

Despite abortion rights advocates this week notching huge wins in state elections — including voters in conservative-leaning Ohio passing a constitutional amendment guaranteeing access to abortions — activists in Florida can’t seem to capture the same level of urgency and excitement, even with crucial deadlines looming.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Do the age demographics of Florida come into play? Most 50 plus women aren’t getting abortions.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

You'd think more people would be capable of caring about issues that don't affect them personally, but I guess not.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly surprising. I thought multiple states were going full bore to get this on the ballot where possible.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Given that Florida requires a 60% "yes" vote for the proposal to pass it doesn't make a lot of sense to put the money/time into getting it onto the ballot there. It's just not going to happen. Ohio's amendment passed with a ~57% "yes" vote and we are significantly more purple than Florida. I know it sounds pessimistic, but the money/effort are better focused in other states.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 13 points 2 years ago

The billionaires that have been preparing for these fights have been building up to it for the last 50+ years. We're not going to undo that amount of preparation overnight, sadly.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

No, that makes sense. I didn't realize it was a 60% threshold. Thank God Ohio didn't pass issue 1 in August and completely doom the state not only for this past election but all the future ones.

[–] pixelscience@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Of course it is