this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
196 points (99.5% liked)

Fuck AI

2899 readers
836 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 week ago

One thing everyone should do before asking a serious question to AI is to ask a question that you know is false just to get a reminder that what you are seeing may sound plausible it may absolutely be false.

Example:

I told ChatGPT that I was researching old railway lines on the Roslagsbanan network and that I wanted more information about the stations on the Åkersberga to Rimbo line.

The response I got was polite and friendly and even gave me a description of each station.

Too bad it made up half of them along with the line itself, and kept the lie going until I confronted it.

Do tests like that to see how easy it is for AI to invent the truth.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eroding critical thinking skills linked to increased AI use.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

"Linked to," though; don't mix up correlation with causation yet. The article also talks about how the cognitive unloading caused by AI use is also negatively correlated with age, and while I don't want to let AI off the hook (or the corporations pushing it), critical thinking skills in general aren't the strongest within the 17yo-25yo age bracket.

Then again, I'm more than a little high, so maybe I'm totally missing something here.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Hmm... Yeah, so my oldest little brother from my dad's side (Yes, I have a large and complicated family) is entirely sold on billionaire philanthropy and AI. He does a lot of AI vibe crap, down to having ChatGPT recommend him what dinner to eat or videogame to play.

He has zero critical thinking skills. I mean zero. And he actually gets offended if I apply critical thinking to anything.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 1 week ago

Working as intended, sadly.

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

More stupidity incoming

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Someone on my local Nextdoor needed to know how much her tree was leaning. She took a photo and overlaid a protractor and it was actually pretty resourceful.

Then she asked people to check the angle. You see, the protector was aligned with the ground, so a perfectly upright tree would be 90°. The tree was at the 65° mark. Damn near everyone said it was a 65° lean, when it was really 25° off from the 90° it should be.

I can't remember how it came up exactly, but she said she looked up if a tree should be 90° on Google, and Google said that would mean it's fallen over. I reminded her that Google's AI suggested glue to get cheese to stick to pizza and encouraged an ounce of critical thinking, asking where the tree would sit in her picture if it were at 90°. She went off about how math isn't her strength, that I'm being condescending (ok, maybe a little but holy crap don't take Google's word for this stuff!) and I think eventually blocked me after a few attempts to explain that she did not have a 65° lean and a tree would be 90° from the ground if everything were perfect.

The future sucks, and it's only going to get worse.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

It's part of why Republicans want to deregulate it. People who lack critical thinking skills tend to statistically vote red.

It also becomes a tool to control.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Critical Thinking skills are obsolete... for the briefest of moments preceding a collapse back into meaning that the tiny men made ironically inveitable.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

A mix of quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews was used with 666 participants in the United Kingdom. They were distributed across three age groups (17–25, 26–45, 46 and older) and had varying educational backgrounds.

im all for the defenestration of ai, but these numbers do not promise much significance. i would welcome a more comprehensive study conducted over a larger geographical region.

remember, 346 of those 666 voted to leave. their critical thinking skills were already suspect to begin with.