this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
255 points (97.4% liked)

News

21885 readers
4209 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

RNC chair Ronna McDaniel has made signing the pledge a requirement for participation in the first debate Aug. 23.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Throbbing_Banjo@midwest.social 106 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Just don't let him debate then. Imagine a GOP primary debate without Trump and how hilarious it would be as they struggle to debate actual policy.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago

Even a debate without Trump would inevitably devolve into an "I support/don't support Trump" argument as the candidates vie for those voter scraps.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You think they'll debate policy with Trump?

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 11 points 11 months ago

No, but they might debate policy without him.

[–] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I say let him participate via zoom, but with a filter applied. My suggestion:

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Why would they just apply a Trump filter? That's weird. They should at least do something different.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 11 months ago

He doesn't really want to debate, though.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Of course he wouldn’t.

Why would you ask him to? You know his answer. Well he could lie and play coy. But you know he’s not going to abide it.

[–] rayyyy@kbin.social 22 points 11 months ago

Absolutely. The orange criminal doesn't think he is obliged to follow any rules or laws, or moral standards.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

It's so funny that the RNC has a pledge like boy scouts. That's how you know they don't care about the constitution of rule of law. Their pledge is ment to override the will of the people.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

GOP: "Swear to be loyal to the party."

Candidates: "I Swear to God."

Trump: "Swear to me!!!"

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

He's only ever been loyal to himself, why would they expect him to be loyal to anything other than that?

[–] relative_iterator@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago

Make it a requirement for being on the primary ballot

[–] sorebuttfromsitting@sopuli.xyz 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

i guarantee tr*** hasn't read Catch-22, but a loyalty pledge? this is dumber than owlshit from all angles.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

Yeah this shit even happens in local elections. Our republican sheriff candidate was decided at a republican meeting rather than an voter primary, and to vote at the meeting you had to sign a pledge. It felt like the year 1905.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Didnt think about that at first, but most of catch22 was less purposefully malicious than the gop right now.

[–] Bwaz@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

He expects them to pledge loyalty to him.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

"That's OK, Mr. Trump. We'll still gargle your tiny button mushroom, sir."

[–] ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If they want something close to an actual debate it is best if the Orange Shit Fountain is not there anyway. Short of a mute button there is no way he can shut up for longer than 5 seconds.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but I want him to get up there and incriminate himself.

[–] donuts@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No shit. Trump is only loyal to himself and expects the same from others. He and his cult of followers don't give a single shit about the Republican Party.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

If anything has become clear over the past years, it's that magats are Republicans and Republicans are magats. I half expected enough "decent" Republicans to be offended by trumps actions and rhetoric to the point of splitting off to a new party. It has happened before. But instead elected Republican representatives and their deplorable voters have grabbed their literal and/or figurative tiki torches to rally around the wannabe dictator.

[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Honestly I agree with his reasoning. There are people on the GOP ticket I wouldn't support either (all of them). I wonder how Ronna is gonna wriggle out of this.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

The concept of a loyalty pledge is fucking insane, never mind that Trump also made people sign their loyalty to him.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't sign such a pledge personally eve if I feel the other candidates are fit. It should be my choice. Wes this normal for the RMC ion the past? Do the Democrats have the same policy?

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

It was never formalized in the past but has always been an unspoken rule: if you're in the party, you support the party's leader. Otherwise, why are you in the party?

In 2016, Trump caused a big stir because he stated he would not support the candidate if it wasn't him. Some people think this was part of the reason he won, that some voters chose to support him because if he lost and ran as a third-party candidate, it would almost guarantee a victory for the Democrats.