this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
89 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38765 readers
187 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Afaik this is basically what the NSA's Prism is.

[–] paequ2 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Well, clearly this is gonna be something that every republican will oppose, right? Riiiight? The government tracking citizens with a database?? My conspiracy theory neighbor bitches about this all the time. He's gonna oppose this, right?????

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2006'es Alex Jones would have gone mental over this.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

Something something accusing their opposition of doing the thing that they either are currently doing, or 100% would be doing if they had the opportunity.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

Hypocrisy is considered a strength. So they're definitely not against it.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Already not a fan of Palantir, this is pretty bad news

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 1 day ago

I think nobody is a fan of Palantir. In a truly democratic society people would never allow such a company to collect all your data.

Well the half-good news is, judging by Palantir's track record of managing large public projects elsewhere, that project is bound to bankrupt the US once and for all so people can build something new. The bad news is, it's probably only going to happen late within the first fifteen years of the 'two-year' contract.

The sprawling bureaucracy needed to analyze and maintain such a database will be so costly in comparison to its actual value that it's already amusing to think about.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] remington@beehaw.org 15 points 1 day ago

Here's an archive link of that NY Times article: https://archive.is/tXBRJ

[–] Rustic_Fry@literature.cafe 5 points 1 day ago

Databases aren't fireproof. This seems like a good reason to kick things off.

[–] GaetanLaberge@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago