this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
37 points (95.1% liked)

Fuck AI

2933 readers
656 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
themaninblack@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
ogmios@sh.itjust.works
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
37
Meta plans to replace humans with AI to automate up to 90% of its privacy and integrity risk assessments, including in sensitive areas like violent content (text.npr.org)
submitted 3 days ago by tfm@europe.pub to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/31376616

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For years, when Meta launched new features for Instagram, WhatsApp and Facebook, teams of reviewers evaluated possible risks: Could it violate users' privacy? Could it cause harm to minors? Could it worsen the spread of misleading or toxic content?

Until recently, what are known inside Meta as privacy and integrity reviews were conducted almost entirely by human evaluators.

Really? Humans? Maybe even qualified humans? Huh! Never would've thought that.

Set your timers. We're going to hear about a non-ethical decision made by this system in 5, 4, 3, ...

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

You act like they weren't already making non-ethical decisions WITH humans.

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago

What could possibility go wrong.

[–] barbedbeard@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's the plot of the innumerable books. Give AI a bunch of laws and guidelines and how it misinterprets them with catastrophic consequences. Even today they don't really know how LLM's work. And they are going to give it control over sensitive areas.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 2 points 3 days ago

And we all knew that they were going to do this at some point.

[–] Goldmaster@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

They already have with numerous problems such as peoples accounts and pages such as mine being removed with no way to appeal. Other than pay.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

Lol