this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
294 points (97.7% liked)

science

19351 readers
672 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

KEY POINTS

  • Elon Musk said SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft “immediately” because of threats by Donald Trump to cancel government contracts with Musk’s businesses.
  • Musk’s announcement on his social media site X escalated a war of words with Trump that began after the Tesla CEO criticized the major tax bill being pushed by the Republican president.
  • A SpaceX Dragon capsule brought two NASA astronauts back to Earth in March after they were stranded for months at the International Space Station by a Boeing Starliner capsule.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do it, bring back NASA into full force and increase their budget.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 2 points 5 days ago

I suspect Trump will more likely move more of the R&D under the auspices of the USSF (ie the Space Force). He can't claim to have "created" NASA, but the space force is his baby.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Dominance of this country is being fought over by a couple of petty 12 year old tyrants. It’s like a version of that Twilight Zone where the powerful kid is surrounded by people trying not to upset him, except the kids are drug-addled and senile.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

What’s the threat here? If you don’t give me money then I won’t spend it?

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The same spacex that hasn’t had a launch since trump took office?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 days ago

The SpaceX that got 3 billion dollars to get us to Mars and didn't get beyond blowing up a banana over the Indian ocean, that one yes

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 211 points 1 week ago (13 children)

And this is why billionaires should not control vital resources

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

But they always do.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 101 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I think I’d laugh myself unconscious if Trump nationalized Space X.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I have said before I will eat both of my socks if a SpaceX rocket and ship fly humans to the moon and safely return by 2030.

I will also eat both of my socks if a two bit mob boss turned fascist nationalizes any significant corporate or industrial anything.

Fascists don't outright nationalize shit, because if they did, the entire oligarch class that is a huge part of their support base would turn on them instantly.

Fascists make deals with, facilitate, get kick backs from corporate oligarchs.

They essentially never seize their assets outright, because that would undermine the entire capitalist system that the corpos rely on, and support fascists so that they will keep getting tax breaks and grants and other government subsidies.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago

You’re almost certainly right, but since the situation is already off the rails, I just figured I’d throw nationalization out there for laughs.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Ah but you're basing this analysis on competent historical fascists

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Find me a fascist movement/party/figure that's formally controlled a state for more than 20 years, that's outlasted its big special leader boy... you know, a 'competent' one.

Mussolini's lasted 21 years, and he was waaaay younger than Trump when he started.

... Are you going to call Mussolini 'competent'?

Fascists are definitionally incompetent and irrational, they are literally anti-Truth with a capital T, the philosophical, as close to objective and reasonable 'truth' we can get.

But, they are also very well definable by understanding that if they fuck with the money too hard, the money will fuck them back.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not likely, Trump is pro privatization.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

nationalise, and then privatise?

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago

Claim Musk is a dangerous foreign influence and force a sale like for Tiktok

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 6 days ago

He'll just flog it to someone more compliant.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've been saying for years that it needs to be nationalized. And this is a really good time to do so; Elon is showing that him being in charge is a national security risk.

But Trump 100% doesn't have the guts to do it.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

That's the CO part of the TACO

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MyOpinion 69 points 1 week ago (23 children)

It is the end of manned space flight for the USA. Thanks MAGAts.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (14 children)

WE'RE NOT GOING TO MARS, YOU FUCKING NAZI ASSCLOWN. IT'S A TERRIBLE IDEA.

NASA HAS LAUNCHED MANY ROCKETS FOR MANY DECADES. YOU BLOW SHIT UP BECAUSE YOU THINK THE RULES OF PHYSICS AND MECHANICS DONT APPLY TO YOU.

EVERYTHING WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU WERE DEPORTED TO A BLACK SITE.

FUCK YOU, ELMO

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nobody is going to Mars in our lifetimes

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Eh, depending how old you are. I can believe somebody is going to Mars in ~50 years.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do I feel like the entire government is based off a 2yo building a house of cards with his bully from school.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 20 points 6 days ago

Because you have a firm grasp of reality?

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago

Is he promising to leave the former US?

load more comments
view more: next ›