this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
531 points (90.5% liked)

Technology

70916 readers
3581 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 28 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Has anyone considered funding NASA?

They made rockets that didn't explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 minutes ago

They didn't, because someone got paid to write this article!

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

Starlink should not just be nationalized but internationalized.
It is internet for everyone on earth, not everyone in the USA.

Every larger nation deploying their own constellation would be a pointless waste of resources, and every smaller nation having to find reliable partner-nations to tap into for that internet access would inevitably lead to people ending up without access due to political games.

Low orbit satellite constellations are the perfect candidate for sharing, they would literally sit unused over most of their orbits otherwise.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 45 seconds ago

I think every larger nation deploying their own constellation would reduce people losing access due to political games.

If there's only one network with the same topology as Starlink, then the USA, China, or Russia will end up making a bunch of rules on everyone else just like Elon does today. Look how the USA abuses centralized internet infrastructure already. Multiple overlapping systems would be wastefully redundant, but reduces the risk of censorship.

We can't get along and can't have nice things.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

We? No. USA can if it wants that shit.

[–] Salamand 2 points 4 minutes ago

Agreed. But also commies believe that when the state takes something, "we" will get it (and they fail to see why states sponsor their useful idiocy)

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 9 points 54 minutes ago

American exceptionalism is so fucking annoying. Their country is failing to a point hopefully this first person shit rightfully corrects to third person.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 minutes ago

Yeah, let's give the trump administration the power to seize companies it doesn't like, that is a great idea that def won't be abused all the time

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 41 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Lets reach a compromise. Impeach Trump (successfully) and then take away SpaceX from Elon. That way things would be fair.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 hour ago

Trump has been impeached successfully. Twice. What I assume you mean is that he hasn't been removed from office. That could be the consequence of an impeachment, but not necessarily.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

I honestly don't care about Elon, just get Trump out.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gemappliedfax@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago

Pedo-nation

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Just having such wealth and thus power in hands of singular humans is risk to all of humanity. With musk you are but big enough drug fueled temper tantrum away from pretty important infrastructure coming crashing down.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 30 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Has US nationalized anything this millenia? I really don't see that ever happening

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 31 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Tax burdens for billionaires

Also losses. Gotta get that sweet, sweet too-big-to-fail bailout money.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Airport security was nationalized as the TSA. Aside from that no.

Technically the auto industry in 2008.

[–] Elkot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

This is what happens when you meddle in politics

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Yeah. Let’s give Trump that power.

[–] reivilo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Quite ironic from people constantly accusing their political adversaries to be communists...

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Errr... am I mistaken? This is the first time I'm hearing about nationalizing SpaceX and it's from Jacobin....

Does Jacobin make a habit of calling people communists? Pretty sure they advocate for socialist positions usually....

big spiderman pointing at spiderman vibes if true

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well that's not really the case. Conservatives will accuse progressive of being communists, and claim any social services are examples of communism. But it's mostly those progressives here on Lemmy suggesting communist ideas.

So it's not really ironic, just unsurprising I guess.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 88 points 6 hours ago (8 children)

You could always just fund the space agency you already have, instead of funneling money to a foreign billionaire.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 36 points 6 hours ago (20 children)

No this the one time I’m with the commies. Nationalize that shit. Like you said it’s all taxpayer money anyway. A little bit of Wall Street speculation, but who gives a fuck about those people

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›