this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
17 points (87.0% liked)

Politics

10506 readers
209 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I really feel for the reporter on this one. Having to try to make incoherent nonsense that has almost no chance of passage make sense is a thankless job.

Donald Trump unveiled a federal program Monday providing $1,000 government-funded investment accounts for American babies, getting backing from top business leaders who said they plan to contribute billions more to an initiative tied to “the big beautiful bill”.

At a White House roundtable with over a dozen CEOs, including from Uber, Goldman Sachs and Dell Technologies, Trump relayed the details of “Trump accounts” – tax-deferred investment accounts tracking stock market performance for children born between 2025 and 2029.

“For every US citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock market,” Trump said.

The accounts will be controlled by guardians and allow additional private contributions up to $5,000 annually. Trump called it “a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation”.

So ... tax credits that go straight to the oligarchs. And a shit sandwich if line goes down.

I keep thinking it can't get more absurd (I'm generally expecting things to get worse), and then stuff like this comes down the pike.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Wow, one thousand dollars?! Life changing stuff.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

It costs $15000 to have the baby in US. I guess now parents only owe $14000 here.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Other countries are giving parents months of support. Baby boxes, free checkups, free medical care, discounts/free supplies, community programming and training.

With my insurance, a natural birth/ C-section cost me $3k.

That $1000 ain't doing shit.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago

"We'll give you a grand to bring a child into this hellscape."

Covid relief checks were bigger.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really feel for the reporter on this one. Having to try to make incoherent nonsense that has almost no chance of passage make sense is a thankless job.

On the other hand, this is sane-washing.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago

Reporters can only push back so hard against individual assignments. It's inarguably news, so you don't have the trump card. This is, then, important information that needs to come out.

Time was, when something was absolutely egregious, the copy desk would stop it from running. Guess what doesn't exist anymore?

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everyday it becomes more and more apparent that money isn't real.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At one point, a shave and a haircut was two bits.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Well I'll be...

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago

This will fuel a whole new generation of sovereign citizens trying to use their strawman to pay for things via the US Treasury