this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
129 points (100.0% liked)

News

30639 readers
3088 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An Atlanta family whose home was wrongly raided by the FBI will get a new day in court, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Thursday.

The opinion comes after a predawn 2017 raid in which an armed FBI SWAT team smashed in a front door and set off a flashbang grenade, pointing guns at a couple and terrifying a 7-year-old boy before realizing they were in the wrong house.

The FBI team quickly apologized and left for the right place, with the team leader later saying that his personal GPS device had led him to the wrong address. But Trina Martin and her then-boyfriend, Toi Cliatt, and her son were left with trauma and a damaged home.

Martin and Cliatt filed a lawsuit against the federal government accusing the agents of assault and battery, false arrest and other violations. But lower courts tossed out the case. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found they couldn’t sue over what amounted to an honest mistake.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

with the team leader later saying that his personal GPS device had led him to the wrong address.

Personal devices for an FBI SWAT operation ? Why do they have a tech budget if they want to use personal toys ? That is not an honest mistake that is a near fatal error from a "professional" using personal devices on an armed federal raid ?

Either way at this point I assume the court is going to charge the family with treason and deport them but require the 7 year old to fend for himself homeless in Atlanta.

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Announcement from the Institute for Justice, which took up this case:
https://ij.org/press-release/u-s-supreme-court-sides-with-atlanta-family-in-wrong-house-raid-case/

A deeper dive on the case here:
https://ij.org/case/martin-v-united-states/

Body camera footage is also included lower on the page under the "Video" section.

Definitely a great nonprofit firm that does a lot of good work bringing cases before the Supreme Court. Especially for those that can't afford to do so.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Anybody with an inside track on this story that can explain this? A unanimous decision by this SCOTUS is rare, particularly one that would benefit a minority family terrorized by government goons. I would think Thomas and Alito would be positively salivating at the idea.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A federal judge in Atlanta dismissed the suit in 2022 and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision last year. The Supreme Court agreed in January to take up the matter.

The key issue before the justices is under what circumstances people can sue the federal government in an effort to hold law enforcement accountable. Martin’s attorneys say Congress clearly allowed for those lawsuits in 1974, after a pair of law enforcement raids on wrong houses made headlines, and blocking them would leave little recourse for families like her.

In dismissing Martin’s case, the 11th Circuit largely agreed with that argument, saying courts can’t second-guess police officers who make “honest mistakes” in searches. The agent who led the raid said his personal GPS led him to the wrong place. The FBI was looking for a suspected gang member a few houses away.

https://apnews.com/article/georgia-fbi-raid-supreme-court-lawsuit-9cb55aa6f45bbf02c29d84363c7c9e6f

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not seeing how this explains why Alito and Thomas would vote for it? Seems like they'd love the idea for the FBI to be able to make "honest mistakes." Perhaps they're going to leverage this to put Biden's dessicated husk in jail or something idfk?

Edit: I'm trying to say this makes no sense for these two ghouls to be on this side of the effort, so I'm cynically asking what's the shadow agenda.

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

About half of SCOTUS decisions are unanimous. The just don't make the news.

The 6/3 splits usually do but they're actually much more rare.