this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
651 points (98.4% liked)

News

30781 readers
2325 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago

Guy kinda sounds like a douchebag

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is just blatant corruption

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

System working as designed. You see, Russia and China are the real problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This won't cause the exodus of the wealthy. It will cause an exodus of the greedy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Tl;dr: New Yorkers should elect Zohran Mamdani as their mayor, and should re-elect him as long as he chooses to serve.

Got it. Locked in. Never been clearer.

Thanks Bill Ackman!

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

These are the ultra privileged who always get their candidates without any debate whatsoever.

This is the extremely rare exception where they show their faces.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Always follow the money. Why are GOP and billionaires afraid and against this man who pledges to help the poor and struggling working class? Because they obviously have an interest in keeping the poor and struggling in the status quo conditions in which they live.

If helping the poor didn't hurt their bottom line, they wouldn't pay to keep it from happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whenever I see anything like this I remember my days working for large American companies and how difficult it was, even as a senior engineer, to get spending approval for anything. Like, even a $20 replacement headset I had to keep resubmitting applications for for three weeks because the managers had a policy of rejecting every first request on the theory that if it was important enough to spend company money on, it was important enough to fill in the form twice.

The point being, these sorts of people do not hand out a single penny without running the numbers and realising that the cost of rigging an election multiplied by the probability of success, is still lower than what they'll financially gain from it going a certain way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Billionaires trying to buy elections

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 1 week ago

FOR SALE: NYC MAYOR

Price: Name your price.

Seller information: The putrid scum that a weeks worth of soaking in bleach wouldn't remove the stench from.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 week ago

by hollowing out its tax base

As if the wealthy pay taxes. GTFO with that BS.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Sounds like he is a frightened douche-canoe. Fuck that guy.

[–] Xande@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Someone should bankrupt Bill Ackman!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

at what point is it cheaper to just pay taxes than buying politicians? mindless greed from control freaks.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s such a mild change too. If you make $1.1 million then your NYC taxes go up $2000 under Mamdani’s plan.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I remember the last time it was run. It's why we got president Bloomberg. Oh wait. Why would he actually reference Bloomberg himself whilst suggesting this? Did he just forget exactly how badly this worked?

load more comments (1 replies)

Ackman wants more Luigi in his NYC I guess

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

I'm gravely concerned that billionaires are allowed to exist

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's really no excuse for this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Remember when Bloomberg tried running for president for like 2 weeks?

Somehow I expect similar effect, burning cash without budging almost anyone.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 16 points 1 week ago

Okay, but Cuomo spent triple what Zohran spent, and got his ass kicked.

Tell you what, just distribute all that money to your employees, and the result of the election will be the same as if you blew it all on a loser.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

And it's all because he's ~~a dirty democrat~~ ~~a dirty muslim~~ ~a dirty ~socialist~~ will let poor people be less poor and rich people be a little less rich

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

Damn, my hopes for Mamdani just got even higher. Low turnout under ordinary circumstances give high-enthusiasm candidates an advantage, by that enthusiastic base's relative size to the ordinarily voting electorate.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wow, I wonder if that's the same billionaire Bill Ackerman who's hedge fund owns forty percent of the New York property firm Seaport Entertainment Group?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bill-ackmans-strategic-acquisition-seaport-230404410.html

How many millions do you think a rent freeze would cost him personally?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who owns the voting machines? Is the software audited? Are there tabulation servers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

Who wants to suck our dicks? Get to the dick sucking now! The chance never has been greater. We need our dicks sucked and will pay handsomely! If we like it, we'll pass you around to suck even more dicks!

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

This mother fucker claiming that wealthy are paying their share of taxes is jokes lmao and implying that the money actually is applied properly is also

[–] snf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Gentlemen, this is plutocracy manifest!

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

The wealthy can leave… nobody cares… if they don’t want to live in a nice city they can easily afford to move.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›