this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
88 points (98.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6962 readers
285 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
88
Democrats retreat on climate: ‘It’s one of the more disappointing turnabouts’ | A changing political climate has California Democrats recalibrating on climate policies. (www.politico.com)
submitted 1 week ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not my favorite source, but not a lot of other coverage.

It's going to take two things to change this:

  • Communication to make sure that elected officials hear from us. That means calling, writing, turning up in person, trying to have private conversations with staff, etc.
  • Active intervention in primaries, so that it's much harder to get elected if you don't support decarbonization
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stung by the party’s sweeping losses in November and desperate to win back working-class voters, the Democratic Party is in retreat on climate change.

That’s not how you- . . . ahhhh fuck.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

Thing we are up against is a media machine which favors racism and all the pathologies which to with that

[–] theLetterJ@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

I agree, Democrats arent my favorite source either.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

once-popular climate policies are exacting a political price by pushing up energy and housing costs

Disturbing narrative to claim as fact. Oil prices were high because of war on Russia, and usual OPEC conspiracy to cut output during Democrat terms. CA electricity prices are high because Utility monopolies are powerful lobbyists, with the biggest factor, raising prices in whole of CA to get out of forest fire related liability bankruptcies. Rate payers instead of shareholders had to pay. Restrictive home solar policies is also Utility supremacism.

There is little in the article that is directly climate related, but the more fuel you are "forced to use", the more expensive it will be. The housing cost reference doesn't have any climate related points in article, but solar mandate for new construction was heavily botched. Extremely crappy solar in small amount is usually installed, without regard to production efficiency/orientation.

If California politicians were paid to make energy cheaper for CA residents (they weren't and aren't), they haven't been doing their job, but its not renewable energy options that are to blame. It's control to limited access.