this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
103 points (94.8% liked)

Marvel Studios

3991 readers
20 users here now

Lemmy


Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios.

This community is a place to discuss, share and generally have fun with all things Marvel Studios.


Upcoming TV/Film:


MCU TV/Film Discussion:


Non-MCU Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Community Guidelines

  1. Be constructive. As a community this is place for discussion, things you liked, things you didn't like, any everything in between. Low effort comments don't add to the discussion.
  2. Be civil. Disagreements happen. Don't attack others. Take a moment and reconsider before you post an inflammatory comment in all caps.
  3. No spam. Please don't post spam, trolling or other low effort content. If you're a human and you saw something interesting or had an interesting thought, you're probably fine.
  4. Memes are allowed. We're a small community, feel free to post memes or similar content. Funny things are good. If it becomes a problem we can discuss changing the rules.

In addition like any community we follow the Lemmy.World content policy rules. In short, don't attack people or groups.


Spoiler Guidelines

When should something no longer be considered a spoiler? In general use your best judgement. If want something more specific,


Related Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 79 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The world is on fire, and the home country of these IPs is falling into a dictatorship. No one is stress watching movies, its not fun. Also, we're broke and we're about to sink into another recession.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 62 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This is, IMHO, why Superman is doing so well. It's the type of unapologetically wholesome shit I didn't know my soul was so desperate for.

EDIT: My wife just called it "hope porn" and I think it fits.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've been burnt out on superhero stuff for a bit, and had zero interest in checking out Superman as the DC stuff has been of no interest to me since the Nolan Batman movies.

I put it on the other night for background noise, but it got my attention right from the start, and I really enjoyed it.

The biggest thing for me was when he saved that squirrel mid-fight. The guy has everyone trying to kill him and the city, and he loves everything about Earth so much he can't see any living thing suffer.

There is so much unspoken collateral damage in all these action movies, and Superman wouldn't even let a squirrel suffer for actions linked to him.

I want someone to look out for me, dang it. Where's our Superman?

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They tried to cut the squirrel scene after it tested badly but James kept it in because it’s so Superman

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just went back and watched the scene. The squirrel part is so quick compared to the other rescues like the dog in that same scene.

The dog got a lot more direct attention, and that makes sense since a lot of people have or really like dogs. But I've never seen anything where the hero stops to save an animal nobody would ever even put in a scene.

It wasn't played up like a bit like the dog, and that made it feel like a more natural thing this Superman would do. It turned a throwaway gag into a bit of character development that in 3 seconds showed us this Superman would put himself on the line to save any life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 days ago

Loved the detail of the squirrel going confused, wide stance alert mode after drop off

[–] Newsteinleo@midwest.social 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is a little hard to watch a movie where the hero saves the day from evil when you have a villain in the white house.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, they might do good making a new punisher who saves the Whitehouse violently. Everyone loves an underdog revenge movie.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Fantastic Four have never been a very profitable property

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 18 points 4 days ago

20th Century Fox kinda destroyed any hype for new Fantastic Four movies.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

This is true. Sure they’re Marvel’s “First Family” but even before the MCU or any of the fox movies they were less popular than The Avengers, who were less popular than the X-men.

Also, putting the movie up against Superman, who is DC’s #1 or #2 character, was a bad call.

I thought the movie was great though.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

MCU used to be able to turn B- and C-list heroes into the biggest stars. I'm pretty sure Fantastic Four was more well known than Guardians of the Galaxy when that came out.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

But in a bad way, in this case FFs reputation works against it. Pretty much all the previous movies were panned.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I’d like to see it but not enough to drop $20 for a ticket and being forced to watch an hour of ads

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cannot get my head around this complaint. They don't lock the doors at show time, so roll in 20-minutes late. That's what we did for Superman. Caught a couple of trailers then the movie started.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because calling it the “start time” is a lie.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fine, be offended by the lie! No problem. But my point was that no one is forcing you to watch the ads and trailers.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It also means that I don’t know when the movie ends because the run time doesn’t matter anymore.

But it’s mostly the lying.

And the ads.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Meh. You're smart enough to figure the actual run time. Hating the lie is good enough! I just won't ban theaters over it. Rare enough that we go anyway. Once a year at most? And even then, only for something that excites me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sgtmoustache@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I've always been a huge MCU fan. I was always day 1 in cinema to see the next movie. But with what is happening in the US, and all the threat the US have been making to my country (and the world), I don't feel like buying and consumming any american product right now.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 days ago

You're not missing much.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

1000%. There are quiet discussions on taxation of digital services here atm, I think adding a 20% import on movies parented by companis in America would bring the EU closer as our movies would be comparatively cheaper and the new revenues could go to grants for our own industry.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Another thing not explored in this article is the 100 days to streaming rollout that we've seen.

A film comes out, ~60 days later it hits Premium VOD, ~30 days later a physical release, shortly after it hits Disney+.

A lot of people are willing to wait for a number of different reasons, economic, hype, quality, etc

[–] ThunderComplex 5 points 3 days ago

For me it’s health related reasons. Even if I wanted to, I can’t go to a cinema to watch a movie.
That’s why I don’t mind paying for premium VODs (that’s the closest I can get to real cinema) but it’s just cruel that in this COVID-era of ours films are still released cinema first with a huge delay until the digital release.
Just let me watch it at home same day it releases for everyone else, I’m willing to pay for it.

Bit off topic but I wanted to watch a YT video about James Bond and like 30 seconds in the guy launches into spoilers for the new Mission Impossible movie. Had to close that tab real fast like; shit like this could be prevented.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I mean I really wanted to see it but I wanted to see Superman a lot more

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Haven't seen Four yet but really enjoyed Superman.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

I watched both and liked both as lot. Fantastic Four is probably the better movie. It's more polished, more visually impressive, better story, etc. But I enjoyed Superman more.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I do think they should have delayed Fantastic Four until at least mid August if not later. Maybe even save it for 2026.

2023 had three MCU films, 2024 had just one MCU film, 2025 was back to three, 2026 will have just two. There was plenty of space for this film, to put it right after Superman was probably a mistake.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just saw FF tonight and I thought it was great. But I suspected interest must be off- I was in a cinema with only 12 other people.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I sqw Superman at 8 pm on the Friday it opened snd the theater was only about half full.

[–] 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

This drop-off tracks with the brand. I say this as someone who likes the F4, they just don't have a broad appeal with general audiences that other comic brands have. They're a property that only comic nerds care about and always have been.

Edit: They also had to complete with Superman. The F4 have never been able to compete with Superman.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm already two movies behind and yeah, I opted for Superman as well with zero regrets.

I know I'll see Fantastic Four on Disney+ eventually, and that's Disney's main problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This honestly is also how I feel. For decades I hear comic books fans rave about how great F4 is, but me being a tangential fan (only read DC growing up) I can name many of Marvel’s storylines from the comic books, but I can’t really name a storyline from the the Fantastic Four books. I know there’s something about a future foundation, but I never knew what it was.

[–] 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Future Foundation is pretty much the definitive modern F4 story. Hickmens run as a whole is peak.

A problem with the F4 is that their golden age of stories was back in the Silver Age of Comic Books. They were a cornerstone a lot of the early world-building of the Marvel Universe. Their lasting legacy has been the characters and ideas these stories introduced to the Marvel universe: Dr Doom, Galactus, The Silver Surfer, Black Panther, The Negative Zone, ect. Marvel has long struggled to adapt the team to the modern era.

I haven't seen the movie yet, but IMO the best F4 stories are ones where they aren't so much a team of super heroes, but rather a team of scientist and explorers with super powers. They are better suited to telling sci-fi stories rather then traditional superhero stories.

[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I won’t say more as to not spoil it for you, but I think the movie does touch a lot on your last paragraph. I think general audiences are just not connecting to it for a number of reasons.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Interesting article. I'd say one fact it misses the importance of is that Fantastic Four is the 37th film in the MCU in 17 years. The MCU a huge sprawling and bloated mess, and it's not surprising mainstream cinema goers have disengaged from it. That actually could hold a movie back - it's not see as a "fantastic four" reboot, it's seen as MCU installment 37 even if it tries not to be that.

Add to that, 17 years is a long time. Frankly a lot of the original audience have "grown out" of watching these movies, and younger cinema goers are not watching MCU movies so they're not replacing their audience. Plus streaming took off in that time and people who are now in their 30s and 40s are not going to the cinema anywhere near as much.

For me, none of fhis is surprising. If anything I'm impressed they stayed at the top for as long as they did. But it had to end eventually - tastes change, people grow up and move on. Super Hero movies aren't gone, but they're not automatic mega hits anymore - things are just going back to "normal". There isn't anything much wrong with the MCU to fix, audiences just aren't as interested in what it offers now.

Marvel/Disney will keep making them just as they do with Star Wars because they're in the business of franchises, but it's beyond it's peak and that's pretty normal in entertainment. Nothing dominates forever.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just don't enjoy going to a movie theater that much. I'll watch it on Disney+ soon enough.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yup, digital releases are within 3 months, high seas within the next few hours. Nothing enticing about a movie theater anymore.

[–] Kurious84@lemmings.world 2 points 3 days ago

Fantastic four is better suited for cartoons and comics. It never was popular.

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Basically, yeah, but with everything.

Regurgitated rehashes of rehashes of rehashes. Ai slop has been our reality since before Ai slop. The only time I even get remotely surprised, it's usually an indie thriller or horror film.

It's no wonder Invincible is popular. It's no wonder Severance is popular. Yeah, they're good, but they're also fresh to the general public. They're innately interesting and new.

Marvel doesn't do "interesting and new". They're a nostalgia factory.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My favourite part of the movie was when Thing got home and announced "Daddy needs to get his rocks off!"

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes. Then he yelled, “it’s sandblasting time!” The camera cut to a wall where a stream of sand was hitting it and it pooling on the floor.

Of fucking course that wasn’t said. 🤦‍♂️

load more comments
view more: next ›