857
submitted 10 months ago by Conowelle@lemmy.ca to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 121 points 10 months ago

SUV, Truck, SUV, SUV, SUV, SUV, sedan, SUV, SUV, SUV, SUV.

The culture problem around big vehicles we've created with bad regulation and aggressive marketing is depressing.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It isn't just a culture problem, it's a tragedy of the commons.

When you're surrounded by giant vehicles, the only way to ~~be~~ feel safe and see the road is to have a giant vehicle.

[-] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The only way to feel safe. The really big ego-support vehicles are no safer than a subcompact to be inside of, but they are far more likely to kill your own family.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Frank@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago

That's not the tragedy of the commons, and that's not why everyone drives turboencabulators.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax

It is, I shit you not, a cold war tariff on fucking chickens. There's some other shit that's glommed on over the centuries, but the mad-science breeding program to create a pickup truck big enough to swallow the sun started with a stupid trade dispute over chickens between the krauts, the frogs, and the yanks.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sadakos_left_nut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 98 points 10 months ago

So glad they put that thick protective white line there so I know I won’t be hit 🥰

[-] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 36 points 10 months ago

It’ll be super protective when it snows!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 60 points 10 months ago

What in the stupid is this?

[-] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 36 points 10 months ago

Cheaper than a sidewalk, apparently.

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 21 points 10 months ago

The cost being the life of pedestrians? This is insane.

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

That doesn't show up on the balance sheet 😬

[-] brillekake@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

What do you mean? The white line keeps the cars out..

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FleetingTit@feddit.de 46 points 10 months ago

If you are walking you're either poor or up to no good, in both cases we don't want you around these parts. Oh, your kids need to walk? Don't be lazy and DRIVE them where they need to go!

[-] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago

Don’t be lazy and DRIVE

For the briefest of moments I felt a spark of blinding hot rage in my heart. Now I am left with the lingering feeling of wanting to smash my head against a rock.

Thank you for that experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fuckass@hexbear.net 41 points 10 months ago

Sometimes I’m driving in the night and I just see old women in work uniforms and a lunch bag walking by themselves on a tiny dirt path on the side of the road to a bus stop, with no lights except my headlights. Shits terrifying and depressing. Conservatives are constantly virtue signaling with child trafficking, but they don’t even want to fix the basic infrastructure that allows people to be preyed on

[-] rem26_art@kbin.social 39 points 10 months ago

Why even allow people in this neighborhood? Just have cars and no people

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mereo@lemmy.ca 35 points 10 months ago

This what I hate about North America. Non walkable neighbourhoods.

[-] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

Weirdly enough it is a walkable neighborhood legit this is the entire street in the picture, for some reason they decided to paint these people lanes instead of just leaving it.

[-] drekly@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

There is no pavement/sidewalk...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] max@feddit.nl 9 points 10 months ago

Can you believe it that some see walkable neighbourhoods as a conspiracy? I just can’t wrap my head around why…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LynneOfFlowers@midwest.social 34 points 10 months ago

Next they'll eliminate the stripe and put up share-the-road signs with the stick figure

[-] mustardman@hexbear.net 13 points 10 months ago

And the carbrains get mad about it because they don't want to share the road because that's communism

[-] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 33 points 10 months ago

Is that a pedestrian symbol or the chalk outline of a pedestrian who got hit?

load more comments (2 replies)

The presence of the paint makes this nightmare area more walkable than plenty of places in the Failed States of America. I once had the misfortune of living in a place where the presence (or much more often, absence) of sidewalk was completely up to the owner of the property the stretch of road in question abutted. The rare property owner who chose to add sidewalk created a completely useless, disconnected decoration.

[-] NotErisma@hexbear.net 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's a storage unit near my neighborhood built on a stroad without a sidewalk, they built a sidewalk that stretches only within the bounds of the storage property.

On that regard: Storage units and hotels are so weird because if they get built in the suburbs no one will bat an eye (despite their density). But if its an apartment complex people lose their minds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Wow it’s like you guys are trying as hard as possible to not put in sidewalks.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 23 points 10 months ago

Soooo...a sidewalk without the extra pavement?

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 35 points 10 months ago

And not an inch of lawn was sacrificed sicko-wholesome

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hagels_Bagels@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 10 months ago

Wow, I sure am glad that the kerb is there to protect those blades of grass!

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I'm just wondering why that corpse was wearing such an unhealthy corset.

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.de 8 points 10 months ago

Unrealistic beauty standards. The corset is the reason they died.

[-] biddy@feddit.nl 19 points 10 months ago

Who would use this? Wouldn't you either walk on the grass or clearly in the middle of the street?

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is an American suburban. The petite burgerosie living in those houses would shoot your or call the cops to shoot you for walking on their lawns, or run you over with a Ford F 69,000 turbo jumbulator hepta-cab ultra-pickup if you walked in the street.

(this might not be an American suburb. It's hard to tell. All suburbs exist in a discrete liminal hell dimension)

[-] uralsolo@hexbear.net 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I thought of this too, and then I realized that wheelchair users are completely fucked by this decision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago

What dystopian fuckery is this?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Melonius@hexbear.net 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Where I live people will park their ~~tanks~~ trucks in the driveway and block the sidewalk. At least they won't be able to do that here, but I wouldn't be surprised if people just start parallel parking on the people gutter

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago

Imagine seeing this when house hunting and still buying the house. You'd have to have worms in your brain to want one of these ugly McMansions with no sidewalk

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

Who the hell designed this? I want to see the person who made this burn in hell

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] herrwoland@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

More like it was a guy who got flattened by a car and got painted over, because that's exactly what's going to happen if you try and walk there

[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I keep seeing joggers in my area choosing the bike lane over the sidewalk, presumably because asphalt is softer than concrete sidewalks. If paving a ped lane next to the bike lane is what it takes to isolate these wrong-way bike-lane-jogging scufflaws, then let's just do it and be done with it. We can cannibalize a car lane to make it happen. >:-)

[-] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Sidewalks in car-brained areas are super dangerous to jog on. People backing out of their driveway or turning across the road at 10-20km/h without looking. Trip hazards. Ankle destroying driveway cutouts or curved surfsces. Uneven grading.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

And of course every car there is a suburban assault vehicle too.

[-] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

You've heard of bike gutters

No I haven't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] gargantuanprism@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 10 months ago

Yo that's unreal

[-] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 10 months ago

Poor Polish village style infrastrucutre, now in your nearest city! (Authentic hole ridden roads not included)

What hell would this be to walk in, jesus christ...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
857 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9481 readers
596 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS