this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
71 points (90.8% liked)

Nintendo

18501 readers
13 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think we all know that patents don't usually mean anything and aren't an indicator of a product actually coming to launch, but what do you all think of a potentially smaller, more portable Switch?

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echo64@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

the thought of even smaller switch controls makes me hands cramp just thinking about it.

You can get slightly smaller - but same size controls - by making the joycons be permanently attached, but not a lot. if you shrink the display the controls gotta come in with it

Don't have a massive amount of confidence in nintendo hardware design for controllers these days unfortunately

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Semi related but for my switch and switch oled I have this grip thing that attaches to it in handheld making it shaped like a wide traditional controller. Makes playing in handheld for more than a half hour so much more enjoyable

If that’s not built in to this I can already feel my hands being extremely sore

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd just like a wider grip for the joy-cons when detached and playing docked than the one provided, to make it as wide as a pro controller or other traditional controller, but I haven't found any. Don't count too much on any Switch 2 controller grip being any wider, though, in Nintendo's eyes they're still mainly a children's toy company and will design their hardware primarily sized for children. I get cramps using even the DS and 3DS.

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I got crams when I was younger even on my 3ds when I was in middle school

My timing might be off with these events but yeah they’re not comfortable deceives

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I fucking hate the switch controllers. I loved the wii, and I think Nintendo sucks now. The wii controllers are better in every way, including their actual ability to track motion.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Worked fine for the 3DS, not everyone has large hands.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not saying your experience is invalid, but the 3DS was well known for being uncomfortable to use

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Fair, I do think it does show that there might be a market for it though.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 10 points 11 months ago

Hmm… the issue with a smaller Switch invariably means a smaller battery. Also, the Joycons are quite small as it is.

It’ll probably sell, as Switches are wont to do, but I wouldn’t see myself in the market for one, were I in the market for a new Switch,

[–] CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I can see them diverging again with a beefy next get one (aka switch 2), but then also introducing a nano switch. The only issue I think is if they are both introduced at the same time and only the switch 2 can play switch 2 games (and is backwards compatible) and the nano could only play switch 1 games, then consumers will be confused.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Will that be confusing? Nintendo released the Game Boy Micro (only plays Game Boy Advance cartridges) after the DS (DS and GBA cartridges). I don't think too many people were confused.

To avoid confusion, Nintendo should name their next system something other than Switch 2, Switch Next, or something else with Switch in the name. Then again, I cannot understand the Xbox naming convention is a bit nonsense but no one is out rioting in the streets.

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The New Switch U XL

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’ve never really cared about Xbox, and tbh I don’t even understand what the newest one is supposed to be called anymore. They really “Wii U’d” hard with the last few names.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Took me a while to understand the difference between all the recent Xboxes. I hate their naming scheme!

Xbox One = base unit, released in 2013. Equivalent to PS4.

Xbox One X = mid-gen upgrade, released in 2017. Equivalent to PS4 Pro.

Xbox Series S = lower-tier current-gen console, released in 2020. No PS equivalent.

Xbox Series X = higher-tier current-gen console, released in 2020 alongside the Series S. Equivalent to PS5.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even people that have one of these can't tell me which it is

[–] CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Switch 2 is a clear sign to consumers that it's not a Switch, which is the issue they had with the WiiU. I think Nintendo will be too scared to risk a repeat of that honestly. I could see a Nano getting a name like Switch Pocket or something similar. But Switch Next is a bigger risk

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, please no. They should stick with just one. They don't have enough output to split into two consoles.

[–] CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Sorry, the best they can do is a New Super Switch U Nano 2/3DS

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Take it the other way. Bigger form factor, better display and processor, make it play a wider platform of games... oh wait that's my Steam Deck.

Switch Nano. Size of a pack of gum and I will hang it from my keychain.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Switch Nano. Size of a pack of gum and I will hang it from my keychain.

NGL, the Gameboy Micro is an absolutely amazing piece of hardware.

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I loved my micro. I especially liked all the faceplates you could swap out and customize with.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Man, even though you didn't actually mention it, reading your comment and seeing all the words so close together, I really want a Steam Deck Nano.

Remote play first device with a focus on portability and first party support from Valve. I feel like the market for that is probably too small for Valve to bother, but I'm so down for that.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I think the steam deck is as nano as I’d ever want it. It’s perfect for my (rather large) paws and it’s still light and portable. My Switch makes my hands hurt after an hour so I mostly use it docked.

[–] Tetra@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

So an even worse Switch? How about no.

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

A pocket sized Switch, supporting the current library of Switch games, would be a must buy, for me. Especially if it folds to protect it's own screen.

If it comes out and doesn't leverage my existing game library, I'll probably just keep buying games for my HyoerMegaTech Pocket, instead.

[–] JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Having a pocketable game console again would be nice. I'd probably get a switch nano if it's the size of like a PSP, 3dsxl, or something.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Switch DS let's goooo

[–] bomanicious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

An official Nintendo version of the Retroid pocket flip would actually be pretty sweet.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 1 points 11 months ago

I just want to find out what this Super Switch that's ostensibly coming out next year is all about

[–] olmec@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I would love a portable that fits in my pocket again. I know people argue the Switch is pocketable, but it comes with a bunch of compromises. Sure it can fit in a pocket, but it isn't comfortable. Plus the screen is exposed makes me hesitant to put it in there (Give us GameBoy Micro style faceplates, and I'm fine with the exposed screen). The worst part though is the vents on the system. Those are begging to eat lint up. A potential Switch Micro would need to address all of these. It might need a significantly more power efficient chip, which would reduce batter size constraints, and allow it to run cooler, removing the need for a fan and vents.