this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
38 points (83.9% liked)

politics

19016 readers
4368 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What a miserable state republican party is in. Front runner doesn’t even acknowledge these “debates” and yet everyone in the room has a singular goal - out-Nazi the Nazi.

[–] pingveno@kbin.social 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Haley and Christie are bad but survivable. I usually try to keep my claims measured, but Desantis and Ramaswamy are every bit as fascist as Trump. I would genuinely fear for the country under the last three.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Christie became a GOP darling in 2009 by torpedoing a major building project that Dem and GOP Governors had been working for for decades. He probably hates the average voter worse than Trump.

[–] FailBait@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Used to live in NJ, he was also despised by his fellow GOP for welcoming Obama with a handshake after we got fucked up by Sandy.

He definitely hates the common people because he knows the common person hates him.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

The stupidest timeline.

Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter despised each other, but when it was time to open the Carter Library Carter welcomed the sitting President, and Reagan gave Carter a great speech. No one thought they'd changed their minds about each other, but everyone applauded the show of unity.

The current crop of GOPs make Reagan look god the way Charles Manson makes Al Capone look good.

[–] loxo@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

What a fucking joke. Fuck the republican party.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Who’s In

Ron Desantis, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, Chris Christie

Who Decided Not To Participate (Again)

Donald Trump

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nikki Haley is nearly every bit as garbage as the rest of them, but her clear stance on aiding Ukraine makes me hopeful she trounces the competition.

She would be an unmitigated disaster for us, but she doesn't seem to be in Putin's pocket like the rest of them.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I mean, since he's going to be the Republican cult's nominee, would it change anything if he showed up?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Christie is the most reasonable one there.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

As a native New Jersoneyite, this true statement horrifies me.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

I'm glad the RNC is wasting all this money on a foregone conclusion.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Aren't they all out, since it's pretty much going to Trump anyways (assuming he's not incarcerated before the Primaries, which somehow still may not even stop him)?

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

The Republican Party can reject Trump if they want, maybe that fractures MAGA and the form the MAGA Party. Lots can happen.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Losers pretend they're relevant once again.

[–] pingveno@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In September, Christie looked directly into the camera and declared that if Trump keeps skipping debates, he would deserve a new nickname: “Donald Duck.”

I remember the Clinton campaign had something about "Donald Duck" because of his refusal to publish his tax returns. Maybe it was sending someone in a Donald Duck costume to his rallies? I don't know, the joke always kinda fell flat. It made sense when you explained it, but then it's not funny, is it?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Four hopefuls will participate in Wednesday night’s debate at the Moody Music Hall at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, according to the Republican National Committee.

Initially seen as the top rival for Donald Trump, DeSantis has been locked in a battle for a distant second place to the front-runner, as well as wading through challenges within his operation.

That’s been particularly true in Iowa, where DeSantis shifted some of his Florida-based campaign staff and where he recently completed a goal of holding events in all 99 counties.

Benefiting from increased attention — as well as the campaign’s shift toward foreign policy after Hamas’ surprise Oct. 7 attack on Israel — Haley is angling to keep that trend going with the fourth debate.

In September, Christie looked directly into the camera and declared that if Trump keeps skipping debates, he would deserve a new nickname: “Donald Duck.”

That didn’t happen, but Hutchinson has said there should not be a rush for candidates to drop out, arguing that voters should have plenty of choices when votes start in Iowa.


The original article contains 734 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago

They're trying to move Christie out.