this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
16 points (57.1% liked)

politics

18968 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TheGuardian.com

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 121 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The Guardian legit just made me LOL:

"At 70, West is seven years younger than the most likely Republican candidate, the former president, 91-time criminal indictee and adjudicated rapist Donald Trump."

[–] Darkncoldbard@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a boxer being announced

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

#Aaaaand now!
#Theeeee most likely Republican candidate!
The former president
NINETY-ONE-time criminal indictee... annnnd
#ADJUDICATED RAPIST!
#Dooooonald Trump!"

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

walks out to "Fat Bottom Girls" doing his patented double-jackoff dance move

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago

West, despite being younger than Biden, is apparently having a stroke.

[–] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Put "Cornel West says" at the start of the sentence so we can all ignore what follows.

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think he's wrong on this, but he's still Cornel West.

[–] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 31 points 9 months ago (4 children)

This won't happen unless it looks assured that Trump won't win. That's basically the only reason Ole Joe has stuck around.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That’s basically the only reason Ole Joe has stuck around.

He basically straight-up said that:

If Trump wasn’t running, I’m not sure I’d be running

  • Joe Biden
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but he also said in that same interaction that "at least 50" other Dems can beat him.

So its not that he thinks he's the only one that can beat trump and that's why he's running.

It's either a pride thing, or similar to Hillary he thinks trump is the easiest possible opponent and he's will to risk it so he can be president

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you’re misunderstanding those two phrases.

“I think I can beat trump” and “50 democrats at beat me” does not mean that “50 democrats can beat trump”.

Primaries are different than general elections.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

...

In what world would the "him" Joe Biden is saying 50 other Dems can beat referring to anyone besides trump?

And why are you talking about primaries?

The party won't support a primary against Bide as an incumbent. So there just flat out isn't going to even be a primary.

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I think it's spite.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That actually wouldn't be a bad scenario:

Trump gets convicted, sent to jail, is no longer the nominee, DeSantis or Haley gets the nod at the RNC in July.

Biden goes "thanks but no thanks" and either Harris or Newsom gets the nod at the DNC in August.

There is a full month between the Republican and Democratic nominations.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ew. The democrats are creepy. Just ew….

[–] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Both parties are just as bad -- look at me posture! Notice me senpai. Dude there is no comparison in american politics right now. One is not left enough and the other is proto fascist. Fuck out here with that rhetoric.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just an fyi you are blindly repeating corporate media talking points without reading what you are responding to or reading what you are saying. It doesn’t make any sense.

No one said the things you are saying they said.

[–] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

That's rich coming from somebody who's repeating conservative propaganda that "both sides are bad". Even if there are things you don't like about the Democrats it's not even a fucking choice at the moment.

Also I attacked you for your both sides attitude. If this attitude becomes prevalent in the United States the election goes to Trump which would be very very very bad indeed, and frankly it's just doesn't align with reality. Where exactly did the corporate propaganda touch you?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised in the least if he resigns within the first year.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No… that’s the only ~~reason~~excuse Biden is giving.

Probably because he can’t say the real reasons. Which, if you take it at face value… it’s a joke because if he stepped aside for someone else, all the “vote for Biden or else” crowd would happily switch to thst someone else.

[–] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Hahaha your very idealistic.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

How high is this dude…wtf. Dude, you’re all over the map and need to take a long weekend away from microphones.

Make it a month. Make it six.

I used to have a ton of respect for this guy, but lately, a lot of the stuff he’s been saying has not made any sense. I don’t know what’s going on with this guy. 

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He took money from Harlan Crow so that says plenty enough about what he says.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

he gave that back. i think he should take money from every rich sucker who will give it to him.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

While I understand your point, it often creates issues beyond optics.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I had a poster of him on my wall at one point.

I’m just so disappointed. Like Jill Stein is aware, running for president as a third party candidate is a grift. He’s not getting the word out there any more as candidate West than as Dr. West, who could basically just walk onto any news show and get an interview. I can’t imagine he doesn’t know that.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well it sounds better than, "I'm getting paid to split the Democratic vote."

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

He might attract a segment of antiestablishment Trump voters as well who no longer support Trump. Likely the Bernie/Trump supporters, or the 13% of Trump voters who supported Obama. Trump arguably won because of Obama-Trump voters.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 20 points 9 months ago

Well, Cornell is going to look like an idiot again when this also doesn't happen.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 13 points 9 months ago

You keep hope alive, dude....

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

West told Politico he might end up running against a “B team” of younger Democrats including Gavin Newsom, governor of California, and Gretchen Whitmer, governor of Michigan, because Biden was “running out of gas”.

So even if Biden dropped out, West would still run as a spoiler? The gall of this man...

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

West would still run as a spoiler

no. he's running as a candidate.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 6 points 9 months ago

He's going to have one hell of a moment if he winds up being wrong.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 5 points 9 months ago

April Fool's, three-plus months early

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Joe Biden will “have an LBJ moment” and decide not to run for re-election next year, the leftwing academic and independent presidential candidate Cornel West has predicted.

West was referring to the moment on 31 March 1968 when Lyndon B Johnson, in office since the assassination of John F Kennedy in November 1963, announced that he would not seek re-election.

At 70, West is seven years younger than the most likely Republican candidate, the former president, 91-time criminal indictee and adjudicated rapist Donald Trump.

Trump, West said, was a “bona fide gangster, neo-fascist Pied Piper leading the country for a second civil war”.

West does not perform as strongly in polling as another independent seen as a potential spoiler in favour of Trump, the attorney and campaigner Robert F Kennedy Jr.

“But if you’re looking at somebody who has a record that encompasses a whole host of things, politically, intellectually, over time and space, alongside my personal life then I might in fact, be somebody you consider very seriously.”


The original article contains 589 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!