this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
513 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

The Summer of enshittification continues apace.

[–] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow the internet really took a nosedive the last few months.

[–] z500@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like to think of it as a reset to early 2000s internet, which was basically the golden age.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

I hope you’re right. Everything was a lot more wild. You’d discover a blog through some link and feel like an adventurer explorer a blank part of the map. It was much more fun.

[–] Piers@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, it seems like people made the internet something valuable, a bunch of commercial businesses turned up to take the reins so they could harvest hat value for wealth for investors, it's reached a point where that juice is no longer worth the squeeze for them and we'll go back to a phase where the progress and generation of value will revert back to regular people again for a while. Likely that balance will then tip back towards profitability again and the cycle will start anew.

@Piers @z500 I remember in the early days of commercialization of the interwebs, the capitalists just could *not* wrap their heads around the idea of *sharing*. Legalities aside, putting music or art or whatever that you had spent money and time on, and then just... putting it out there for anyone was so foreign to them.

[–] sznio@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tech bubble is over.

Let's hope the old web returns.

[–] fades@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t believe that

[–] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You know, come to think of it, the internet has been oddly stable for the past decade. Prior to modern social media, sites used to come and go all the time. I had to switch forums twice because the ones I was using shut down. Same for my image hosting sites and flash game sites. We were honestly due for a major shake up.

[–] axibzllmbo@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

The link rot from this is going to be monstrous, RIP

[–] sagacity@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The money ran out, now we have to face cold hard decisions regarding what parts of the internet we are wiling to pay for.

[–] prole@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

It's better than ads

[–] azureeight@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am going to not be able to find obscure gifs i remember from the 2000's 😩

[–] AndrewZabar@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what you’re saying is nothing important is being lost.

[–] azureeight@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, if you don't convey emotions to friend via gifs I don't know what to tell ya!

[–] dax@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

it's our generation's Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra!

[–] Pepper@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm gonna take a wild guess and say the reason why gfycat integrated into basically everything was because they launched themselves at the tech giants and gave everything for basically nothing.

I thought it was pretty suss that they suddenly showed up on every platform.

[–] EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

They were purchased by Snapchat last year. So this is probably Snapchat seeing it as only a cost center with no return. Which tbh, it probably is.

[–] chloyster@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Woah, that sucks. More ruined links across the internet

[–] hybridhavoc@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I can't say I knew anything about how they operated to begin with. How did they pay their bills?

[–] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TIL that Snapchat bought it, any idea why they're now killing it? The usual reason would be that it contained/owned something they wanted (tech, IP, data, etc) and they didn't actually care about the service, reckon that's the case here?

[–] withersailor@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Saving money is my guess. Running it is costing more than it makes. Company shuts it down.

[–] MariaTacobellina@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stolen from another discussion thread: Interest rates are up and quantitative evening is over. For nearly 15 years money was basically free for tech companies. Banks don't pay anything, bonds don't pay anything, the stock market is overheated and investors are still looking for return. So if your tech company was already public you could borrow in the form of bank loans or bonds for dirt cheap and if it was still privately held you can get money from individual and corporate investors.

Now that the free money era is over a lot of companies have had to finally think about making a profit so that they can keep the lights on. This is why there have been tens of thousands laid off in the tech sector in the last year or so.

As far as Reddit goes I have no idea what they've been thinking. It seems like they've been spending money developing features nobody wants or needs: locally hosted images and video which have to cost a fortune, live chat, and NFTs, to name a few. They've got the ~20th most popular website in the world with millions of daily active users and they can't figure out how to make it profitable?

The API the third party applications used doesn't serve ads. All they had to do for a bump in revenue is to insert ads and require third party applications to display them or risk losing their API access. Users would grumble but it's a pretty reasonable ask. The fact that they didn't do this demonstrates to me that they don't think the money is in serving ads, they think it's in data mining and they can only get the data they want from the official app.

[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I never understood was why not tie API to Reddit premium. Such a simple thing and it would’ve converted a lot of users without all this fuss.

[–] can@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Because it was about control. They want you on their app where they decide what you see and track how long you see it.

[–] skycat@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I'm glad one of GIF platforms went down. GIF format is disgusting anyway. APNG is superior in every way and should replace ugly GIF garbage format.

[–] HumbleHobo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where is DataHoarders representation here on Lemmy?? Anyone know?

[–] AccountForStuff@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

!datahoarder@lemmy.ml I believe