this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
258 points (92.7% liked)

World News

32283 readers
736 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 57 points 10 months ago (23 children)

China's EV revolution showcases the power that state actors have when an industry is a matter of national security.

China has marginal domestic O&G reserves, so moving off of O&G is incredibly important for Chinese interests.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And since the oil and gas companies in China are nationalized, they will follow along with the government's plans rather than obstruct or bribe their way as with for-profit private oil and gas companies in many western countries.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Woah hold the phone, you're telling me there's a way to build society OTHER than by explicitly rewarding greed and exploitation‽

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)

It is a similar story in Saudi Arabia and many Arab countries. The oil and gas is nationally owned, and the revenues are being used to finance a massive welfare state as well as the transition away from fossil fuels.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They also don’t seem to have many standards either. Specs and reviews I’ve seen seem to jump generations within a few months. I think my favorite ridiculous spec was the ability to use two fast chargers (one on either side of the car since it has two plugs) to pump some 300 miles in 5-10 minutes. It’s wild to read about the stuff they’re doing.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is there any safety reason to not be able to have two plugs? I could see that being something we could do to renovate western gas stations for EVs in order to facilitate the transition. Just have two plugs side by side so Jim-bob could get his 300 miles in 10 minutes with electric just lol he does with his diesel now

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 3 points 10 months ago

Definitely heat, and a design to handle it. Ford has an issue with some Mach-E’s that the power junction would weld itself shut if you used the DC fast charger and floored the car shortly after. Once that happened it bricks the car and you gotta replace the part.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] doylio@lemmy.ca 38 points 10 months ago (6 children)

It's worth noting that this is not being done for environmental reasons (more half of all coal pollution comes from China), but for strategic reasons as China has limited access to oil near it's borders.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 63 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I mean, that's a pretty good reason. I'm not too concerned why they do a good thing, as long as it's done.

[–] realitista@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention that they are the world's biggest manufacturing power, so whatever they make for themselves will likely also benefit the rest of the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 21 points 10 months ago (6 children)

An EV running on a coal fired grid still has less emissions that a prius. Facts dont care about your feelings.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Could you please run us through your maths? I'm legit curious.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago (5 children)

An ICE is only, at most, 35% efficient. In contrast to lithium batteries and electric motors, which is more like 90% efficient. Electricity produced from the dirtiest coal plants that exist, used in an EV, is more efficient and, thus, more environmentally conscious, than burning gasoline in an ICE.

[–] labsin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Coal power plant efficiency is less than 40%. You'd also not get 90% of the outlet on the wheels. There is also a lot of loss on the grid, but there is also on the production of fuel. The two pollute almost the same.

Burning coal however is a lot worse for the air quality.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's the put the pollution somewhere else policy so that cities are more liveable. It was hurting China's reputation and too many rich Chinese were going overseas and siphoning away the economy (and still are).

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'd like to prefix this all by pointing out that coal is absolutely terrible to use in several ways.

However: most thermal plants get about 45% efficiency, based on using very high steam temperatures. We all know that the theoretical max efficiency for a thermal process is limited by the Carnot cycle, which explicitly depends on the difference in temperature between the working fluid and the surroundings.

I'd also like to point out an important point: carbon plants are not constricted by the need to keep the engine lightweight, we can capture most fly ash and other process exhaust.

I again, do not care to bring such an arcane tech back online, it's terrible to mine, process and use. Just remember there's a bit more to all of this that engineers have indeed thought of.

E: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196890415007657

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zhunk@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

I don't know if their statement is universally true, but the EPA's fuel economy / total emissions calculator seems to show it for what I've put in. You can put in a Prius or random EV and see how they compare.

https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/electric-vehicle-myths#Myth1

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=bt2

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Is it worth mentioning? Why?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 10 months ago

What a ridiculous distinction. Do you really think this narrative difference in motivation is noteworthy? What is scarcity if not an environmental consideration? What is lack of sustainability if not an environmental consideration?

It's being done because it leads to a sustainable equilibrium of their social system. Whether that meets your standards of rhetorical "intentionality" to meet the criteria for "environmentalism" is meaningless.

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Car engines are immensely inefficient and car charging is a load that's easy to load-balance for renewables (dynamic pricing see: Tesla)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 16 points 10 months ago

Now do coal

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago

Also worth mentioning that it's not just cars, but public transit and city planning.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

As a Saudi I'm happy with this development. The future of cars is electric.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

But at what cost?

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Where are the batteries coming from?

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 12 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Maybe it's crazy idea but... China?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“Every car you start driving with electricity, you’re not driving with oil,” said Robert Brecha, a professor of sustainability at the University of Dayton in Ohio

The journalist has to have a personal grudge against him. That d'oh quotation makes him seem dumber than my dog.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

And it's not even necessarily true: it takes a certain mileage to offset the extra CO2 that an electric vehicle requires for its manufacturing (mostly batteries), which directly depends on the grid's carbon intensity. If you recharge your EV from a coal or oil plant, you are still burning coal and oil.

load more comments
view more: next ›