171
Google Photos Alternative (lemmy.brennoflavio.com.br)

What are you using as a Google photos alternative? Currently I'm using Nextcloud but I'm thinking of switching to a more dedicated solution.

I mainly need to upload photos from my device automatically, have an UI to see and classify them, albuns and sharing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] supersheep@lemmy.world 116 points 6 months ago
[-] controlphreak@lemmy.ml 40 points 6 months ago

Thread is over, because this is the only correct answer.

[-] stackPeek@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Interestingly only one or two years ago, people seems tp recommend PhotoPrism

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yep, until PhotoPrism revealed themselves to be the greedy cunts they are.

I sponsor my favourite tech projects annually, as I believe in supporting independent and responsible open-source development.

I became a paid Github sponsor for PhotoPrism because they promised features like multi-user were coming, and they indicated that paid sponsors would get access. After what seemed way too long a wait, they finally released the features many of us had been waiting for, only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users. 🤨

So, I switched to Immich about 6 months ago. I've found Alex and the rest of the team to be very active, and quite responsive to support requests, including on Discord. Additionally, the development is fast-paced and new features are coming all the time.

My money's going to Immich. PhotoPrism can go get fucked.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

Nah. The Premium model is kinda bullshit. As a free tier open source user you will always be a second class citizen.

Also everyone who wants to commit code has to sign away his rights for them.

tl;dr maintainer gets money from open source contribution over the premium tier, but hinders everyone else to do the same with the AGPL licence.(kinda)

That's not a good foundation to start off.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 6 months ago

Immich iirc has seen huge and rapid development in the past two years so no surprise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rootiest@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Definitely Immich.

There's a lot of these kinds of services, hosted or self-hosted that are labeled as a "Google Photos replacement"

But very few of said services have features like face matching and object recognition alongside automatic backups.

IMO it's not a legitimate replacement for Google Photos without those features and Immich really delivers on that without compromising your privacy.

[-] Alborlin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Hi is there a guide for Complete Newbie like me , right from how to download this software(I could not find link or anything resembling.exe for installation,) upptill how doninput it on my zorin os laptop and setup my and my familys phone to upload photos to our own laptops via immich. Like a a book idiots guide to xyz... Kind of thing

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] bazzawhite@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Looks interesting. Just wondering if anyone has tried Mylio which also looks promising and has many tools for de-duplication and tagging which I quite like in Google Photos.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 6 points 6 months ago

In this community anything that isn't open source is not going to be relevant to the majority. It sure does look like a competent product though but I question it as an alternative to Google since it's going to be tough to survive when one is pre-installed and automatic without any user intervention on pretty much every android phone and the other I hadn't even heard about until now and I've researched alternatives...

I think they'd be smart to make their free version open source to assuage the concerns about risking that the product dies and all tagging etc becoming useless / wasted effort. Even though I understand the reluctance because the primary motivators for going premium aren't really open source compatible (pay for more devices etc.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It is great, but the mobile app becomes slow AF when I import all my google photos which are thousands of them. Even after indexing has finished.

Edit: Scratch what I said! Just gave Immich another shot, and the slow mobile app was due to the initial background sync running.

[-] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

How many photos? It's a very good user experience for me, with 123GB library (23k+ photos, 1k+ videos). Fairly entry-level Samsung phone and iPhone 13, both work great.

Running on an Orange Pi 5 Plus.

Absolutely love Immich. Was previously running on an RPi 4 w/4GB RAM, but with the other services I had on there I needed to disable ML. Orange Pi 5 Plus (16GB RAM) and it's just a dream. Kicked off ML/facial recognition before bed and it was done in the morning. Migration from RPi to OPi was straightforward.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago

Holy shit, this is incredible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 3 points 6 months ago

Yep, Immich is tha bomb! Able to completely clear out google photos!

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I set up Immich a week or so back. It's been a dream so far. The object recognition is really way better than expected. The App works really well.

I used this script to import my Google Photos dump. https://github.com/simulot/immich-go

I can't say I used every possible feature of Google Photos but I haven't missed anything yet!

[-] dracs@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

Set Immich up a couple weeks ago and I'm surprised how good it is. Their docs included a simple cli tool to bulk import all my Google photos. Mobile app is working great. I'm really impressed with the search too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Discover5164@lemm.ee 31 points 6 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] antsu@lemmy.wtf 20 points 6 months ago

+1 for Immich. It's the most complete and competent Google Photos replacement yet.

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 6 months ago

I will get downvoted for this but a Synology Nas is simple and does 90% of what google will do. They also have their own DDNS or you can use whatever you like.

Downside is tou have to buy their hardware. Unless you do the Xpenology route.

[-] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

Been using a Synology NAS for the past year for automatic photo backups. Take a photo, it gets copied to my drive at home so long as there's internet access available. No issues so far. Turned off my backups to Google.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homegrowntechie@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

If you already run NextCloud, then NextCloud Memories (not photos) is very good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kia@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

Proton Drive just recently came out with their photos feature, but it's still a relatively new product.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

Apparently Lemmy needs a better faq search.

[-] Rolando@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Not OP, but FWIW I didn't realize until reading your comment that the "awesome-selfhosted software" under Resources was actually an FAQ/List. I thought it was a repo of maybe just a couple relevant apps.

I know that doesn't make a lot of sense now that I think about it, but I think it's easy to miss.

[-] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Synology Photos. I've heard Immich is quite good too.

[-] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I'm using Autosync on Android for backing up my stuff, but have no gallery service on my NAS yet. I'm thinking about Piwigo, can anyone share some thoughts on it?

[-] AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

If you need a UI to have albums and share them then yes, the previously mentioned Immich. I host it as well, and it is truly awesome.

One caveat though: it is still pretty early in development, there might be breaking changes. For example a few weeks ago you needed to update the docker compose file because they changed dependencies.

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 7 points 6 months ago

100% this. I recommend also setting up SyncThing to keep a completely separate backup of your photos (if you have the means). They even state that on their GH repo that, due to the highly active development, you shouldn't rely on Immich as the sole solution to backup photos and videos.

[-] AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Ohh, I havent thought about backing it up with Syncthing! Thank you!

[-] rambos@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

a few weeks ago you needed to update the docker compose file because they changed dependencies.

You are right, but they warned us about that few releases before in the mobile app and on the web. They reduced the number of containers again woop 🎇

Photostructure is a strong starter, but development is slow and it's still missing important features like sharing. Also, it's not ooen source.

Immich seems great but doesn't (yet) support digikam tags ( and since my 100,000 assets are tagged/organized via digikam, I don't want to move to immich yet and have to start over).

PhotoPrism seemed pretty good, though it also doesn't (yet) support digikam tags. Also, their self-hosted version doesn't have all the features of their paid versions.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago

My need for online photo galleries is just to direct friends and family to see them, I don't store photos in the cloud.

I used to put up my photos on deviantart, I have had a gallery there for almost two decades, but lately dA has become very slow to navigate, so I built my own site, I didn't need much, an index page linking to HTML galleries I export from digiKam.

After a few weeks of learning, designing and testing HTML and CSS, I have a nice index page that is responsive and easy to update and customize (in limited capacity).

This runs on a normal webhost, and is lightning quick to navigate, the galleries support browsing with the arrow keys, and just works.

There are three annoying things about it though...

  1. To update a gallery, I need to recreate it in digiKam and upload it manually to the host.

  2. I can't include notes with the photos.

  3. I have to edit a link in every gallery to make it be able to go back to the index page and not 404...

[-] kzhe@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not self hosted but Ente photos works perfectly for me. Paid but cheap.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
171 points (97.8% liked)

Selfhosted

37741 readers
427 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS