this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
236 points (99.2% liked)

News

23387 readers
3409 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 65 points 10 months ago (3 children)

People who are dumb enough to try taking a loaded gun onto an airplane are lacking the mental capacity to own a gun without endangering other people. In civilized countries, this usually will lead to a revocation of your firearms licence.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If the person is charged and convicted it is effectively the same result in the US, as it constitutes a felony and convicted felons are barred from firearms purchase and possession.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't that be being reactive rather than proactive?

Edit: you can downvote me but the truth will still be the same

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

well yeah, but you don't actually know if they're that dumb until they do something that dumb.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

If only there was a way to administer some kind of test to prove that they aren't that dumb before allowing them to purchase a gun.

Too bad there isn't. Oh well, what can you do!

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

License? Some states just kind of give you access to firearms for being able to breathe, right?

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I’d argue driving might be more than they could handle.

[–] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

I have no idea how anyone can "forget" they are carrying. I carried fairly regularly for years before letting my CCW expire during COVID. And I was always VERY aware that I was carrying, checked regularly to make sure I wasn't printing, and what places allowed and didn't allow carrying.

To me, forgetting you are carrying a gun and going to the airport is a negligent as leaving your gun in a bathroom. It shows you are not treating it with the respect and caution that should be required in order to own a gun.

EDIT: Clarified that I carried for years and made sure I wasn't printing.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's just complacence. Doing the same thing every day. It's just a habit. People probably forget. That's not an excuse at all , in fact, I'd say that becoming complacent with a firearm is extremely bad in any circumstance.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It seems insane that people take a gun with them so often that it becomes a habit. Impossible to comprehend from a country without an unhinged gun culture.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

They carry their crippling fear and inadequacy with them everywhere. Why not the gun too?

[–] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I agree that it is insane. But considering that I live in a country with an unhinged gun culture, it is part of life.

And weirdly, you have to strike a balance. You don't want to be complacent and forget you're carrying a gun or treat it like it isn't the deadly weapon that it is. But you have to be comfortable and familiar enough with it to be able to go about your day and be able to reliably draw and fire accurately if a situation occurs where the gun is necessary. Otherwise, there is no point in carrying at all.

Maybe a good comparison is driving or operating heavy machinery? You need to be aware at all times that you are operating something that could kill you and others in an instant at all times. You need to know where you are, where others are, etc. But you also need to be comfortable and familar enough with your vehicle or equipment that you can operate it smoothly and react to unforseen events.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

I've had issues with pocket knives I forgot I couldn't take through security. I assume it's that same with any object a person carries habitually.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

checked regularly to make sure I was printing,

Either this is a spell correct or I simply don't understand the sentence...

[–] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I believe it means that the gun is making an "imprint" in your shirt. Like someone could see your gun under your clothes. I would think if someone were concealed carrying, this would be undesirable.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like they wanted it to show. They're part of the problem.

[–] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, just autocorrect fail. Meant I made sure regularly that I wasn't printing. I didn't want it to show. That would break the whole point of conceal carry. And I live in a state where open carry w/o a license is legal so I could if I wanted. But I didn't want to.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

That makes more sense.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

I see, thanks!

[–] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, autocorrect fail. Meant that I wasn't printing. Which means I made sure that there wasn't an obvious gun bulge or something visible.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago

/u/electric trombone pointed that out, yeah.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago

I don't know about forgetting weapons.

But forgetting you have something on you on general pretty easy. I mean it doesn't necessarily be on you I am gonna expect the truly forget ones probably was on a bag or similar that they didn't remember they put something there the other day.

[–] AmberPrince@kbin.social 36 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Maybe they’re still just as bad, they just had a lot more chances

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Now just think of all the loaded guns that they didn't catch

[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Well, that is an entirely different point. TSA is 99% security theater to make people feel safe. If they found a record number of weapons, but on the other hand miss most of them anyway, did they miss a record number of weapons, too?

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We shouldn’t need to issue PSAs about not bringing your gun in your carry on, but here we are.

[–] echutaa@programming.dev 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No need for a psa just enact law that makes someone this reckless and absent minded ineligible to own firearms. The problem will stop real quick with that.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

It's because TSA calls the cops and cops decide if they charge.

If the TSA brought federal charges everytime, people would stop "forgetting"

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Should be ineligible to own after that AND get a big fucking fine and/or jail time.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You have to think most of these guns were brought by accident and were pistols. Most people keep their pistols loaded because they have them to kill other people if necessary. An unloaded gun is less lethal. People who carry all the time seem to get careless after a while. Inb4 stories of people with pistols just for snakes or bears or whatever, that is definitely not the most common use case. I know someone who had a gun in his bag and they charged him like $500ish dollars to mail it back to himself and threatened him with fines up to $2000 but there were no additional fines levied.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 42 points 10 months ago

You have to think most of these guns were brought by accident and were pistols.

While that is certainly true, it doesn't make it much better. It means that a bunch of people are forgetting what they've done with their loaded firearms when they go to the airport. Seems to me that if you are a responsible gun owner, you'd damned well better know where your gun is at all times, especially if it's loaded.

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It depends on the culture within each state.

I worked with a guy from Florida who was telling us that legit everyone in Florida carried a gun, and that it was so common to keep one on you that when he left for work one day and realized that he’d left his gun at home, he did a u-turn and went all the way back home to get his gun before heading on to work.

I don’t feel like that is necessary for me, but then I’ve never lived in Florida either.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

To think that this guy almost died that day. Crazy. 🙄

[–] ShadyGrove@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

As someone who used to live in Florida, I don't know anyone that owned a gun. I'm gonna assume that guy was probably just crazy.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 10 months ago

Well that's most definitely quite normal... /S

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

At least TSA has something to do now lol

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 months ago

They fine $15k for every violation. They're making bank

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago

People are so god damned stupid

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

One time I had a giant Costco-sized thing of Tums in my bag and they brought out the drug sniffing dog and the science kit to take one - from the still unopened bottle - and test it.

It was a minor annoyance, but I couldn’t imagine packing to go to the airport and not making sure I don’t have a loaded gun on me first. That would be the first step, before ID or whatever.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

TSA does not own any drug sniffing dogs. All of their dogs are trained solely for the detection of explosives. The TSA is very open about the fact they are not looking drugs.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Huh….well I assumed drugs. Interesting!

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 10 months ago

7000 guns. With those numbers they should simply accommodate the customers. Simply provide gun locks at each checkpoint.

  • "It looks like you have a gun on you, sir. Please place this gun lock on it. It will be unlocked by an agent at your destination"
  • "Yes officer, I forgot I had a gun in my sock, sorry. Thank you for the lock. Bye."

Problem solved.