this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
33 points (73.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29876 readers
568 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Was thinking about this in terms of AI. As we create it we are probably going to put fail safes on it. So it would be reasonable then to assume if we were created the same thing would be programmed in us.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gregorech@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But we can that's what DNA is and we are learning how to rewrite it.

[–] ghostfrog@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true, I wonder where consciousnesses falls into that?

[–] Gregorech@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

C.S. Lewis once said you are a soul, you have a body.

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

now we need to protest against god to open source humans or make a libre alternative

[–] jesterraiin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hard to say. It depends on what kind of programs/robots we were. It might be that certain percentage of us are our creaters, it might be that we got rid of our creators, it might be that there's only one creator...

Too many possibilities.

[–] SPOOSER 2 points 1 year ago

Does not compute error error error cheezoid hates self

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nah, they'd allow self modifying code to see what we do with it.

[–] kaktus@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But we might be able to reverse engineer it. Isn't that what we are doing, kinda?

[–] ghostfrog@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

If only they left an instruction manual

[–] Thoth19@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And you think they did it correctly? Every large SW project has bugs. I assume this one would as well.