this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
181 points (92.9% liked)

memes

10311 readers
1986 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] weariedfae@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Why would they sweat? You just input the amount of the check, stick it in the machine to get franked, and the till opens. It's not much more complicated than cash and way easier than damn WIC (great program, lousy execution).

Handing them a check isn't a problem. What sucks is when the customer pulls OUT the check book to slowly fill it out, AFTER you told them the total, while your line backs up and it fucks your metrics.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

When I worked as a cashier in a grocery store many years ago, someone gave me some checks to pay their bill. I didn't even look at the damn thing, just inputted the numbers it said and started running them through the check machine. It seemed to go through the machine correctly.

But just then the manager ran over and stopped the transaction. They were fake checks.

I guess silly me assumed things would just automatically not go through in the modern age, but I guess it showed me that I really have no idea how check machines like that work.

Still don't, but I don't work that job anymore so it doesn't matter.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How the machines work vary depending on the machine and POS setup. There are some that scan the check and ping the associated bank account to perform payment routing in an eCheck format, but the vast majority that I worked with just franked the check (which if you didn't know is a glorified stamp with the transaction and deposit information for the bank to indicate the check was a part of a retail transaction). With the lower end printer models, you could run a blank piece of paper through it and it wouldn't know the difference.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah I'll bet ours just stamped it or something! Surprised more people didn't try to pull one over on my dumb ass haha

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

We would have to write a debit card details on the back of each cheque, as the debit cards were also cheque guarantee cards up to a certain limit.

[–] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's always some granny that wants to get cheap therapy from captive audience too, have to know how all her relatives aren't talking to her for 'silly reasons' that she wont back down from. Plus Everythings Changed here, why would YOU do that, hurhuhruhurhuhruhur, add a few more 'jokes' at your/company expense like you are responsible and now it's been 15 minuets and somehow your boss takes it out on you. This is why.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I’ve been getting better at gently shutting down customers who want to talk my ear off. I got shit to do, and as nice as I am, I’m gonna get fired if I don’t get my shit done.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Metrics? What idiot measures the number of customers you serve as a cashier? That's ENTIRELY dependent on factors the cashier can't control

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago

People who benefit from having something they can point to as the Real Reason they fired you for not performing sexual favors

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Shitty, but you could easily tie the time-per-customer to the number of items, then standardize around item-time. Compare that to the number customers, and bob's your uncle.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I worked in the tech space for grocery during the period where a lot of states were converting from paper WIC checks to an eWIC or SmartWIC setup and jesus is that system just an obtuse mess for everyone involved. It was confusing for customers, it was confusing for employees, and it was confusing for the retailers. It was damn near impossible to support and troubleshoot issues.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's interesting how some govt programs literally fly, faster than sound, if the end result is a loud bang.

Meanwhile ones that are ostensibly meant to help people (SSA, VA, WIC) have the lowest quality programmers and program managers fucking it up for everyone.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I can't speak for the others that you mention, but truthfully the WIC programs were actually fairly well fleshed out and the transitions introduced a lot of much needed changes to make the program more efficient. There were just a lot of moving parts and every state handled things a little differently.

Most of the friction was coming from the fact that the changeover introduced a lot of validation and oversight that customers and retailers were not used to with the older systems.

[–] VonCesaw@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

In most places, WIC checks have actually been phased out! Which would have been nice 10 years ago

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You don't even really need to fill them out anymore. You just sign it and have them run it through the machine for the exact amount.

[–] tjhart85@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

When I was a cashier, I'd tell people that and they'd respond that it wouldn't fill out the carbon copy, so they'd just manually continuing to fill out the check anyways and hold up the line :-\

With the machine filling out the checks, it's no slower than running a credit/debit card.

[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have worked in retail on and off for a combined 25 months since 2016. Not once have I ever seen cheques being used. I'm not based in the US.

Why the fuck would people be using cheques in this day and age

[–] Dud@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

I had a friend who worked as a developer for a large bank. She said nearly all paper check transactions are scrutinized these days because they all trigger automated fraud flags.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Man, the USA truly is stuck in 1996...

[–] Faxing_Berlin@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think now a days it’s only a thing with older people. I was at Meijer the other day walking toward the self checkout and I walked past an elderly woman writing a check as she was waiting in a cashiered line.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah but that lady would have been told "Nope, come back with cash, credit or debit" over here. Heck, I had cashier jobs in the early 2000s and we didn't accept checks!

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The USA is stuck in 96 because an extreme minority of people still use checks? lol what?

You know what you’re right. I was using Apple Pay back in 96 to pay for groceries.

[–] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

I always thought it was kinda fun when I worked retail honestly lmao. People rarely paid with checks so I rarely got to use the machine that you stick it in and it goes KA-CHUNK.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

I worked retail for a decade and we would get checks time to time. Mostly always the elderly.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

An elderly lady paid for groceries with a check in front of me. I was honestly pretty mad.