this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
49 points (76.3% liked)

News

23300 readers
3423 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Quick summary: Muhammad married his wife Aisha when she was 6 and consummated the marriage when she was 9.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm always interested in how religious texts are explained away.

Like with abortion, the Bible clearly states that life begins at the first breath. It's actually a bit extreme in that causing a miscarriage is explicitly a loss of property and NOT murder. And everyone knows about how they give guidance for am abortion in case of infidelity.

But it's always explained that the Bible uses some vague identifier for an unborn, and the rest is just kind of ignored.

So, what's the explanation for the pedophilia in the Quran? Just different times? She wasn't actually that young? They didn't actually have sex? Or just how "dare you ask about that"?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Just different times? She wasn’t actually that young?

Yes and yes depending on who you ask.

They didn’t actually have sex?

No, they had kids.

Or just how “dare you ask about that”?

Definitely.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

A lot of times people who grow up with a given religious culture don't realize how fucked up it actually is.

Like, let's be real - the belief that a 12 year old girl gets knocked up by her unborn child's alter ego as God in order for that child to get tortured and killed in order to appease his own blood lust in place of your ass is whack as shit.

Even at the time there's a record of Romans being weirded out by the tradition of the Eucharist and the notion of eating the body and drinking the blood of an incarnated god.

Being raised or indoctrinated into a thing goes a long way towards normalization.

[–] CassavaKing@lemmy.ml 22 points 10 months ago

Well, he's not wrong. Even their own early Islamic sources say this 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Later, Mehta apologized for calling fire hot and ice cold.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Religion is fucked. People causing acts of violence over religion is fucked. All religion should be shamed out of existence, but that's not going to happen.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 5 points 10 months ago

Not with that attitude.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Mohammed was a pedo

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

This is what happens when people view their texts as infallible. They either bend to the old texts or they pretend that the texts match their personal beliefs.

[–] Yamainwitch@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kiddie diddling is an abrahamic tradition, because MyStErIoUs ways.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well.... christian priests are child diddlers too... so its a religious thing in general.

[–] Yamainwitch@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

The abrahamic religions are any that worship the god of abraham which would be: judaism, christianity and islam. I'm an equal opportunity western religious critic.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Christianity is abrahamic

[–] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Pedos gonna pedo..

As far as I can remember there is a "fake" text what says Virgin Marie married Joseph when she was like 12 and got pregnant of Jesus when she was 13.

It is a "fake" text cos the Religion Institution conveniently says so.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What about his first wife?

[–] Lath@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Rich merchant widow older than him.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And subsequent marriages were for alliances and such, following traditions of the time?

[–] Lath@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

I could say yes, but honestly I don't remember. Because let's face it, rich first wife and last child bride are kinda hard to beat when it comes to being memorable.

I will say instead that his daughters were given to allies and such of his age, one of whom was a brother-in-law if I recall the relations right.