this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
-46 points (4.0% liked)

politics

18863 readers
4004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He also thinks Trump shouldn’t be removed from any ballot under the 14th amendment, so why do we care about his insight?

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

If democrats had any intent of keeping him off the ballot they would have charged him with something by now. They need him as a viable villain to keep voters in line and scared.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

The guy who biden told, in an interview, "if you vote for Trump, you ain't black" or whatever it was biden said

Keep in mind, Biden has a long history of not being on the right side of progress as far as civil rights and equality is concerned. For example in the seventies, he voted against bussing to desegregate schools, and voted in support of segregation. Also, he voted against the right to gay marriage in the 90's and was anti-abortion until some one in his presidential campaign and explained how outdated his politics really are.

Oh. also, he chaired the comittee that "interviewed" Anita Hill when her accusations of sexual harassment against Clarence Thomas went public (and just before they went public- when he knew full well the contents of her interviews and affidavits with the FBI said something to the effect of "Nobody disagrees that Clarence THomas is a man of character"

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 8 months ago
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Charlamagne Tha God broke out in laughter after being asked if he agreed with First Lady Jill Biden - who boldy said that her 81-year-old husband has the vigor and energy to serve a second presidental term.

The first lady was asked if she had any concerns over Joe's health as he heads towards the 2024 election - giving the firm answer: 'He can do it.'

The Breakfast Club host has been a thorn in the side of the Biden administration, often criticizing the presidents comments and history on race in American.

While guest hosting the Daily Show in December, Charlamagne said the 'ultimate Christmas gift' would be President Joe Biden dropping out of the 2024 race and pleaded with him not to make the same mistake as Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

This comes as Biden's job approval rating has dropped to a low for any president in the past 15 years, according to a poll published Monday.

It makes him less popular that Donald Trump, his likely presidential election opponent, who hit 36 percent approval at the lowest ebb of his time in office.


The original article contains 796 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!