261
submitted 5 months ago by Hooverx@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 87 points 5 months ago

that's some load-bearing "after"

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

I don't even think victory is possible for Russia in Ukraine, never mind taking on NATO after.

By that I don't mean they cant win the war in Ukraine, there is a possibility of Trump winning and pulling US backing, the EU not making up the difference and Russia winning a slow grinding victory over the Ukrainian military. But can that really be called a win? All they will have achieved is trashing their own post soviet surplus, their military, their economy and their largest export market just to be able to spend the next 20 years locked into counter insurgency in Ukraine and expanding and strengthening NATO. I don't see that as a win for Russia just to gain a buffer state to ward off an invasion that would never happen thanks to nuclear weapons.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 15 points 5 months ago

let’s play word association! okay

… Russia … Pyrrhic

[-] Tujio@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Hey, a pyrrhic victory is still a victory, right?

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

As long as the enemy is more decimated than you. /S

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure Poland wishes they’d try something. They’d love payback for Stalin parking his army while the Nazis razed Warsaw.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Eh, that's a bit of a stretch. Poland is one of the stronger militaries in Eastern Europe. If somehow Russia got out of their war in Ukraine with anything resembling a semi-intact military, they'd probably be trying to roll into either Georgia or Moldova next. I mean, more than they already are in those countries. I think if they were really going to test NATO's mutual defense treaty (like if Trump was elected, who has repeatedly refused to affirm he would support article 5), they'd probably start with attacking a Baltic state after some heavy interference and hybrid warfare first, maybe trying to carve a land bridge to kaliningrad or "protecting russian speaking peoples" or something as an excuse.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Some of talking heads already said it about them but also about Kazakhstan and Finland. These news are for internal consumption, to look big and still kicking for the average TV consumer.

Some NATO countries recently did a first in many years coordinated strike at Ansar Allah, Yemeni rebels, to show their might for free. I think it can be an answer to that.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

ORLY? Poland? A NATO ally, who fought with the US in Iraq? Please try it.

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Blowhard blows hard to State run media. While I don't doubt that there are people within Russia that want to see a further invasion of Europe, I strongly suspect that many of the major power players in Russia understand exactly how far fetched such an invasion would be. No matter how rosy of a picture his generals are likely painting for him, Putin can't help but notice that Kyiv is not currently under Russian control. And the Russian military structure likely knows that they are really not ready to take on all of NATO at once. At the same time, it's always possible that Putin will face internal pressures to escalate. So, NATO needs to be ready, which sadly means yet more wealth thrown away in keeping humanity hanging on a cross of iron.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

That's a fucking dumb ally. The thing that made early Hitler appeasement so fucking insidious is that Hitler kept coming to the table saying "this is the last thing, guys" in a believable enough manner that people scarred by wwi accepted it - you never want to be seen as a crazed war monger.

[-] Risk@feddit.uk 20 points 5 months ago

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-messenger-bias-and-credibility/

Has it at 'mixed credibility'.

Is this story for any reason significantly different from Russian State TV sabre-rattling designed to placate and enthuse a Russian audience?

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 15 points 5 months ago

well there will be a bit of formilization of the russian control of belarus but yeah then on to poland. I keep saying how its just like ww2 except germany is russian and checkosylvokia is ukraine and poland is poland.

[-] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I can assure you, many polish people REALLY want ruzzians to try this shit. They have been preparing to kick some ruzzian ass for decades

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 11 points 5 months ago

"After these guys finish kicking the shit out of us, you guys can take a turn, if you like!"

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That is straight up delusional. No other way to put it.

There would literally be a Polish flag flying in Moscow in 3 weeks.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

These blyats don’t get that 1991 actually happened.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

This is starting to look like a "get a second term by bombing the shit out of something" preparation. I'm almost behind it if it means we don't see a Trump win, but it's certainly predictable as fuck.

[-] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

bet the Poles dont cheer the next time Russia invades....

[-] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 5 months ago

It will be the time to denazify Poland..

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca -3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, sure Russia keeps attacking other countries. But that’s still no reason for NATO, right?

[-] Fudoshin@feddit.uk -4 points 5 months ago

With Sweden and NATO banging on about "inevitable war" I can't help feeling like they're all engineering consent for a new World War.

Jokes on them cos I'd welcome nuclear Armageddon and give zero fucks if we have a new world war cos I'll run my face into the nearest explosion.

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
261 points (94.5% liked)

World News

37368 readers
2754 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS