this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
454 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2748 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Moody’s Analytics has found 21 million “red flags” associated with shell companies that could be used to enable financial crimes, from ancient directors to dubious addresses.

For instance, more than 2,200 companies have directors aged 123 years and above, despite the fact that the oldest known human lived to 122, said Richard Graham, a director at Moody’s Analytics, in research published Monday. One listed director — at 942 years old — would have been born in the 11th century.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eczpurt@lemmy.world 112 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So do these shell companies get investigated once they see an anomaly? Or is it a case of "whoops we forgot to update our current CEO. Thanks for the reminder."

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 60 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A small fine and a finger wag will be the result of extensive investigation into these errors.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was thinking a strongly worded e-mail. Possibly a letter, but let's not go crazy.

[–] pelerinli@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nothing written, just verbal warning is "given".

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Unlike the 'verbal' warnings at my company. Which are written, and submitted to HR.

[–] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Probably nothing happens at all.

[–] justdoitlater@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

Those pieces of shit dodge taxes while the rabble pays them like shit. Thiefs

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

what are the chances that it's the default MS Excel date of 01/01/1900 in most cases?

the 942 year old guy could be a mangled date format? maybe someone whose date was to have been recorded as October 1981 and the 10 and 81 got stored as the year?

yeah I'd rule out MS Excel date errors before really buying the conclusions in thia article.

[–] NucleusAdumbens@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Though that wouldn't explain the other odd things mentioned like the thousands of companies listing their address as the Egyptian pyramids, 1 guy holding thousands of roles at thousands of companies, companies listing only 1 employee that have billions in revenue, etc

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

it wouldnt, sure. and im not referring to those inconsistencies at all.

when it comes the dates specifically observed in the article though, as anyone who's worked with Excel will attest, date calculation errors cannot be ruled out until they are explicitly, well, ruled out.

it very much is in the realm of possibility that all other data is accurate and date errors still manifest themselves.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago

So this is how immortals have been getting away with things.

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Moodys? You mean the pay-to-win rating company that nobody regulates?

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It may be the same Moody's, I can't tell, but they have a different domain name and have a long list of departments including investments and portfolio management, compliance/KYC, supplier risk management, and many others. They are a large financial services company. https://www.moodysanalytics.com/

Regardless, this is a very interesting investigation.

[–] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Moody’s Analytics is a subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation. The Moody’s Investor Services is all part of the overall Moody’s.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 15 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Moody’s Analytics has found 21 million “red flags” associated with shell companies that could be used to enable financial crimes, from ancient directors to dubious addresses.

Atypical directorship is just one of seven key behaviors highlighted in the research, including mass registration, dormancy and circular ownership.

While new regulations across the world are looking to improve transparency at shell companies, there is still some way to go, with $1.6 trillion laundered annually, according to data from Moody’s Analytics.

“Organizations today face mounting complexity in understanding true ownership structures and detecting risky corporate relationships,” said Ted Datta, head of the financial crime compliance practice for Europe, Africa and Americas at Moody’s Analytics.

While shell companies might have legitimate purposes, their opaqueness is often use to hide criminal financial activity, Moody’s Analytics said.

Other red governance flags included jurisdictional risk, outlier ultimate beneficial ownership and financial anomalies, it said.


The original article contains 342 words, the summary contains 147 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] SeismicNote@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or maybe just sloppy vampires?

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

Hanlon's razor tells us we should just assume stupid vampires :D