this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
550 points (97.7% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2599 readers
229 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 210 points 9 months ago (4 children)

WHY ARE YOU POSTING THIS ON MY FEED I DO NOT UNDERSTAND YOUR INTENT I DO NOT HAVE AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY WITH YOU

[–] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

WITH PREJUDICE

[–] black_rain@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are my eyes being detained or are they free to read on? Are my eyes being detained or are they free to read on? Are my eyes being detained or are they free to read on?

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

This comment made me break your car window on reflex.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andrewth09@lemmy.world 111 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 86 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They even titled it "word magic" lol.

[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's appropriate since they believe that words are magic and as long as they say the right words, the "spell" will be cast and they will become immune to laws.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I do not ~~understand~~ stand under!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 9 months ago (8 children)

That’s probably the most sane part about It.

I think they are saying that those Words where chosen specifically because they can subconsciously affect the words users perceptions.

Not magic nor a conspiracy but there is psychological truth that different words with identical meaning can effect us differently.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 73 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Or you know, from the old (and current) French "Parent", which itself came from the Latin "Parentem". But I guess making a quick search isn't as fun as making shit up.

[–] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Nah man, that doesn't sound right. See "pair rent" is much more believable. Everyone knows that these conspiracy things always need to rhyme or sound similar or have the same letters but rearranged. Not be the same word in another language, that's just bunk.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 71 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Just in case anyone is curious-

parent (n.)

early 15c. (late 12c. as a surname), "a mother or father; a forebear, ancestor," from Old French parent "father, parent, relative, kin" (11c.) and directly from Latin parentem (nominative parens) "father or mother, ancestor," noun use of present participle of parire "bring forth, give birth to, produce," from PIE root *pere- (1) "to produce, bring forth." Began to replace native elder after c. 1500. also from early 15c.

BIG GOVERNMENT has apparently been planning this since feudalism.

[–] pacology@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

OH MY GISH !!! parent comes from the Latin for to produce??? Like produce that can be shipped in ships, therefore when you are Berne’s you become produce that can be shipped on a ship, turning you in a product of the US government corp (unincorporated), which means that when you are driving you are actually being shipped as freight in your car, which means that only maritime law applies and that the cop that is stopping you doesn’t have jurisdiction because you are actually a shipped good and he isn’t the coast guard or a customs officer.

That also means that you can’t physically be charged for stuff because the shipping company (i.e. the US government) is actually responsible for all the costs incurred during shipping (i.e. you driving) under the imperial maritime charter or 1753 and the amended treaty of Orville of 1772.

That makes sense now. Thank you!!!

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

The Magna Carta is unconstitutional!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.world 65 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Fake etymology conspiracy theories (aka "word magic") are one of my biggest pet peeves.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I refuse to believe that whoever put this to print did so earnestly. Surely they at least must've known this was bullshit they were peddling to make a quick buck off some gullible rubes.

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (7 children)

I've known a couple schizophrenic dudes that got into numerology while they were struggling. This text sounds exactly like that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

There's no information on the Internet about the author, Pao Chung. Probably just a scammer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You know it’s funny. I keep trying to wrap my head around their beliefs; and then I hit the crazy wall and realize that there is nothing sane anywhere in there.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I invite you to enjoy Munecats documentary on the movement across the world.

The absolute best person reviewing the work of the absolute worst people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 36 points 9 months ago (9 children)

This made me think about when you hear about someone who has a really high genius level IQ in the 180s or whatever; statistically, there must be someone somewhere who has an IQ as far below the average of 100 than the genius IQ is over it.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That's not necessarily how averages work. 80, 80, 80, 80, 100, 180.

The average is 100, but there is no "counterpart" to the 180 at the end.

EDIT: note that my sample size is way to small to perfectly describe the human population, and ~~variance~~ distribution is also impossible to represent with a sample size of 6. Obviously there ARE people way below 80 IQ; I'm just saying you can't say for sure that there must be a person around 20IQ just because one with 180 exists.

[–] sus@programming.dev 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

technically, IQ is by definition normally distributed with 100 as the center. But by the definition there would only be about 500 people in the world with an IQ of 20 or lower, so it breaks down because of the amount of people in an unrecoverable coma and such

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also I'm pretty sure an IQ of at little as 20 would probably be impossible to measure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TheCheddarCheese@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (4 children)

yes because the us government would OBVIOUSLY put in a hint in their wording if they really wanted to do that. just a little easter egg for us to discover

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] falsem@kbin.social 28 points 9 months ago

I'm pretty sure this author is a paranoid schizophrenic or something. Most of these guys are just dumb and gullible - this one is just kind of sad.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

#IAmEightAndThisIsDeep at most

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 22 points 9 months ago

"birth/berth"

They call it that as a trick to subject babies to the regulatory structures that govern ships, which essentially says that the government can commandeer you whenever they deem necessary. Oh you think you have rights? Well in the eyes of the law, you're just another skiff with a bad attitude.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 21 points 9 months ago

Sovcit means sovereign citizen for anyone else who is confused

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

It's possible you circled the *least *bonkers part of the page.

[–] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They have printed literature?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

God, I should just trip balls, write a book while I'm doing it, and sell it to these whackjobs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (4 children)
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

Wow. A lot of talk about magic in there. Way more wiccan hippy than right wing sovcit but I guess you go far enough down the rabbit hole and they converge.

Pdf also seemed to make my CPU spike like crazy, wonder what else is embedded in there... Probably not magic

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I never understand why they say the US is a corporation? It isn't and can't be

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Have none of these people ever heard of etymology?

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 44 points 9 months ago

Have you ever wondered why they like to use the word etymology to describe the study of words and their origins? The word etymology sound similar to the words "A tamale, gee!," which means "A tamale you're excited about." When your pair rents signed your birth certificate, they agreed that you're a tamale.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No thanks, I don't like ants

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The most sensible thing in that book is the legal disclaimer at the front.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] palitu@aussie.zone 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Holy shit....

Just started to read it...

Holy shit

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Barometer3689@feddit.nl 11 points 9 months ago

Part of me wants to buy this book just to see how crazy it gets. But I don’t want to give the grifters money…

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

This mofo never had any “loco parentis” at school then

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

DELETE ALL PICTURES OF RON!

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Laugh all you want - I'm now worth $700 million as the majority shareholder in my birth certificate.

load more comments
view more: next ›