this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
278 points (92.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2176 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"It's almost a cruel joke on the electorate that the longest presidential election potentially ever might also be the one that they're least excited about," said one Democratic pollster, speaking anonymously to candidly discuss the race.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 113 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Biden has advanced a lot of helpful policies for millions of people in his first term, really progressive civil rights policies and good economic and foreign policies.

trump rapes people, lies about it, and repeatedly commits election fraud.

The only way you can pretend these two are remotely similar is if you ignore the real world because you're too cynical to learn anything.

Lazy article, lazy thesis.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The only thing similar about them is that the electorate doesn't want them. Oh, and they're both older than former president Bill Clinton, who has been out of office for 25 years now.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I want Biden. And he won The New Hampshire primary without even being on the ballot.

I think this "the electorate doesn't want him" shit is made up or refers only to people who don't understand or know about the positive consequences of Biden administration policies, repeating vapid, empty headlines

It's repeated too often with zero evidence outside of ludicrous polls to be given any merit.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The anti Biden noise is basically leftist idealists who would rather spend their time fighting other leftists than the alt right, and Russian bots.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Come on, are we really going to pretend that being in your 80s is ideal for a president? At age 81 the probability of dying in any given year is more than 7 percent, reaching more than 10 percent at the end of his presidency at age 85. Let’s not even mention the risk of mental decline. What do we do exactly, if Biden goes the way of Feinstein (incapacitated but unwilling to leave office)?

He’s miles better than the alternative, but it remains a very risky choice. I fear what will happen if Dems need to use the 14th amendment to remove him from office.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

These are good points. Problem is that he's basically the only other choice and arguing about whether or not to vote for him only helps Trump right now. I would absolutely vote for someone other than Biden if I thought it would do any good, but it won't. Like it or not we have a two party system in the US so it's Biden or Trump right now.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

This is why the primary shouldn't have been rigged for him to be the nominee, and one reason he should have stepped aside. Biden currently polls worse than Trump, but do you know who polls higher than Trump? Undeclared Democrat. Biden filled his role and did his job well, but it's time for him to move on. It's a lot like how RBG should have retired and moved on when the timing was right instead of letting her legacy get completely undone.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Agree, and conservative trolls who want to spread whatever dissent they can since they have no leg to stand on and no viable candidate

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 60 points 10 months ago (20 children)

Well, here's your problem.

Republicans, by and large, want Trump.

Democratic voters, by and large, want to make sure that Trump loses (much like the person he is), and would like any candidate that can offer a high probability of that happening. Biden has already beat Trump once, and has, overall, been a pretty decent president. (Yes, the Israel thing is a mess, I know. From the river to the sea, etc.) Dems might prefer a younger candidate that's better at ramming legislation through--which no Dem could do right now, not with Republicans controlling the House--but preventing a Republican victory is more important.

So that's how we've arrived here.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Bernie would be better. But we already know what the old establishment dems think of him.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sanders, while I love the guy, is a more polarizing figure than Biden.

Biden was pretty much always going to be the nominee in 2020 for that reason: he was never anybody's favorite, but he was the one face in that field with the important distinction that while nobody really super liked him, nobody really hated him either. Cast a wide net, big tent, and all that.

While the people who like Sanders really like him, there are also a lot of people who would vote Biden to block Trump for whom being asked to vote for Sanders would be a bridge too far. Not that they'd vote for Trump instead...but they just wouldn't cast a vote for either main party candidate.

...which of course also segues neatly to the fact that Sanders isn't a Democrat, and asking the DNC to nominate someone who's not even a party member is a big ask anyway.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

If Sanders is a polarizing figure, it's because democrats (and republicans, obviously) paint him that way because his policies diaagree with their donors. In reality, Sanders' policies align with the vast majority of Americans, but there's no way that'll be allowed through our bought-out election system.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

This election started in November 2022, because the media wants to milk as much money as possible from both rage bait and fear mongering.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And yet, democracy itself is on the ballot. I don’t want Joe Biden to be my nominee, but I also realize that Trump is the absolute collapse of America. It’s letting our basest instincts and lesser demons overcome the promise of what we could be.

I don’t care that he’s old and moderate and held dumbass positions in the past. Biden is what is standing between order and chaos. Stability and collapse.

One candidate openly supports lawlessness and fascism for his own personal gain. The other is an old yellow dog Democrat who governs from the center right. It sucks, but the right thing is showing up for Biden IF you vote in a swing state.

If you don’t vote in a swing state, vote hard down ballot, then do whatever for president. It doesn’t really matter.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Biden has not governed from the center right, at least during his presidency.

He's advanced concrete LGBTQ rights more than probably any other president.

People talk about him like they have not been paying any attention to the three years of policy and legislation he's pushed through that advancing civil rights, and it's probably because they aren't paying attention and it's easier to complain then comprehensively analyze the candidates.

trump is a rapist who doesn't care about hurting people for his own gain, so it's pretty easy to analyze him, but these two candidates couldn't be farther apart. In terms of domestic and foreign policy, civil rights, economic policy, it's just they're nothing like at all.

Lazy equivocative articles like this are useless or worse because they're spreading misinformation that Biden, who has actively helped tens of millions of people with his policies, is as bad as Trump, who has actively hurt untold millions with his policies.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Biden is an establishment Democrat, and the Democratic party has been a center right party since Bill Clinton.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The trick is to make up your mind on him before he gets sworn in, then it's easy to dismiss any progress as "not far enough" or "just doing it to get re-elected"

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Got no horse in this race, but wouldn't "doing it to get re-elected" be a good thing? Isn't that how democracies are supposed to work?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm gonna be honest, this shit is too noisy. I am exhausted by all of this. On top of it all, these fucks make more money in 5 minutes than I will slaving my life away. I hate politics. I hate bribery codified into law. I know it would be worse for everyone if this whole thing imploded but sometimes it feels like that would be a win. Because then maybe some of these fucks that don't realize or care we all have to share the same pie would be forced to take what has been alloted to me all these years. Am I saying I'd rather us all be in the dregs like rats? Probably not, but I think a healthy thing for a society to do is to not allow people to indirectly harm others by claiming a far bigger piece of the global pie than them and their ilk could ever remotely finish.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The problem with implosion is that it’s people like you and I that get hurt, and implosion doesn’t guarantee a sane outcome. To the contrary, countries that have major upheavals generally end up with authoritarians and dictators in power rather than easing into a stable democracy. The rich guys that remain take even more power and wealth. They’re even more untouchable.

The only kind of major upset that would effect real change would literally be to kill off the rich and powerful, especially the extremists. Otherwise it’s a long, difficult slog to possibly, if you’re lucky, change the system via democratic means.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So an oligarchicide? That has a nice ring to it 🍴

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spider@lemmy.nz 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They also want a cease-fire in Gaza, but once again, The Big Club doesn't care.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The lack of a good candidate not named those two.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Nikki Haley is still running. Good grief people... There are 48 primaries left to go. If Republicans want someone else they can still choose Haley.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but they won't and you know it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

She is not going to win a single state. Her shot was NH. She is getting buried in the state where she won the governor's race; after she loses there, I can't imagine she'll keep getting funded.

The republican party will split before they abandon Trump.

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (13 children)

Because Democrats are assholes and refuse to see how fucking good Biden has been. Perfect is the enemy of good and they keep pushing left and don't have the numbers.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)

Do you have a list? Aside from trying student loan forgiveness, empowering unions (after kicking the rail union in the dick), and pushing Ukraine aid, I haven't seen anything spectacular, though I may have missed it.

Abortion still needs addressed federally, corps are killing us with prices and blaming inflation or covid, congress is still insider trading, and right now they're all collectively sucking Israel's dick.

I'll still vote biden but I'm gonna fucking complain about it.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a list?

Why yes, I do:

What has Biden done?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] snownyte@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

Maybe it's because we're tired of old as fuck candidates. I just want more capable and sharp-minded candidates. But we're not going to get that because old farts love other old farts so they keep getting on the ballot.

[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Regardless of the outcome, I fear this election will kill me.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I dunno. These articles strike me as right wing misinfo. I'm VERY excited that Trump NOT get elected again. That wouldn't matter even if he were running against Homer Simpson.

load more comments
view more: next ›