this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
269 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18968 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to conclude that the state can lawfully bar former President Donald Trump from the Republican primary ballot because of his actions in 2020 that culminated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The case concerns, among other things, whether Trump "engaged in insurrection" under Section 3 of the Constitution's 14th Amendment and is therefore prohibited from serving as president.

Griswold, a Democrat who is the top election official in the state, filed a brief ahead of Supreme Court arguments next week that defended Colorado's process for determining whether candidates are eligible.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 46 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If trump is kicked off the ballot (rightfully so in my opinion) republicans will continue kicking and screaming and will most likely start kicking off non republicans from ballots in their states for made up reasons.

I don’t care. We shouldn’t break the rules just because republicans are threatening to break even more rules.

I find it hard to believe that republicans are even taken seriously in the media. And unquestioned even…

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I find it hard to believe that republicans are even taken seriously in the media. And unquestioned even

That's because the mainstream media outlets that take up 90% of the proverbial oxygen are all owned by billionaires and billionaires don't give a shit about democracy or people who aren't at least hectomillionaires. Plus responsible journalism doesn't pay enough for mega-yachts and fleets of private jets.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For what it’s worth, I also urge the Supreme Court to keep Trump off the ballot.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Somehow, I suspect your opinion is worth the exact same as Colorado's SoS's to SCOTUS.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

This SCROTUS makes me go nuts!

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Well, yeah. Now, Maine's SoS's stance would be relevant, since in her state, it's a SoS decision to remove him from the ballot. And the core of this case isn't Trump being removed - that's already been litigated. The core is ultimately whether or not Colorado (and by implication Maine and every other state) has the authority to kick someone off the ballot for being an invalid candidate.

If Scotus rules against Colorado, minors and immigrants will be allowed to get on the ballot. Schwarzenegger should run.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to conclude that the state can lawfully bar former President Donald Trump from the Republican primary ballot because of his actions in 2020 that culminated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The case concerns, among other things, whether Trump "engaged in insurrection" under Section 3 of the Constitution's 14th Amendment and is therefore prohibited from serving as president.

Griswold, a Democrat who is the top election official in the state, filed a brief ahead of Supreme Court arguments next week that defended Colorado's process for determining whether candidates are eligible.

The same state process is used to determine whether candidates for president are barred from serving for other reasons, such as whether they are the required minimum age of 35, the lawyers added.

The state, they said, "should not be forced to include a candidate found by its courts to have violated his oath to support the Constitution by engaging in insurrection."

The case will be closely watched, as other states could follow suit if Trump is kicked off the ballot in Colorado.


The original article contains 241 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 22%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!