this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
118 points (98.4% liked)

News

23376 readers
1860 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
118
Armies of bots battled on Twitter over Chinese spy balloon incident (www.newscientist.com)
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Large proportions of users posting on Twitter – now X – about the Chinese balloon that drifted over the US and Canada in 2023 were bots attempting to shape the debate

Tens of thousands of bots tussled on Twitter to try to shape the debate as a Chinese spy balloon flew over the US and Canada last year, according to an analysis of social media posts.

Kathleen Carley and Lynnette Hui Xian Ng at Carnegie Mellon University in Pennsylvania tracked nearly 1.2 million tweets posted by more than 120,000 users on Twitter – which has since been renamed X – between 31 January and 22 February 2023. All tweets contained the hashtags #chineseballoon and #weatherballoon, discussing the controversial airborne object that the US claimed China had used for spying.

The tweets were then geolocated using Twitter’s location feature, and checked with an algorithm called BotHunter, which looks for signs that an account isn’t controlled by a human.

“There are lots of different things [identifying a bot] is based off, but examples are whether your messages are being sent out so fast that a human literally can’t type that fast, or if you’re geotagged in London one minute, then in New Zealand when it’s physically impossible for a person to do so,” says Carley.

The researchers found that around 35 per cent of users geotagged as located in the US exhibited bot-like behaviour, while 65 per cent were believed to be human. In China, the proportions were reversed: 64 per cent were bots and 36 per cent were humans.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wow the dead internet theory gets more real by the day

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe it's true overall, but I think Twitter, where there are a lot of notable names and very little moderation, is the perfect place for that to foster.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Reddit too, tbh. One of the main reasons I left.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What defenses does Lemmy have?

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Even less its dangerously easy

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't the geotagging thing just be a VPN?

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Usually with a VPN you choose a location and stay there, you don't hop. You can of course, but the question then would be why are you doing so?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yep. And if Canada is monitoring my VPN's IP, they must think some Canadian is pirating a whole shitload of TV shows and movies.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I remember there being almost 4 incidents in the span of a week but they only talk about one weather balloon. What about the object over Alaska?

[–] Suspiciousbrowsing@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

I wonder how they geotagged China when twitter is blocked there