this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
139 points (87.6% liked)

World News

38500 readers
3546 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 104 points 7 months ago (7 children)

A random employee of a financial institution is not a "finance bro"

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 37 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

journalism is falling apart before our eyes but don’t worry i’m sure some prominent figures will SLAM each other along the way

edit: everyone saying that gizmodo isn’t journalism— that’s exactly my point. this article shouldn’t be given space on a “world news” community. hosting this is bad journalism.

[–] dave@feddit.uk 11 points 7 months ago

But what the bank did next will shock you.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

They may slap and spank each other too. Both of which I have seen in headlines recently.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 5 points 7 months ago

Whelp, it's Gizmodo. Calling it "journalism" is a stretch.

[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Maybe be more specific in what you label “journalism”, because Gizmodo ain’t dat.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

If my middle school history courses taught me anything, it's that journalism has always been garbage and biased.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

“CashKin”

[–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Where did this "bro" thing come from anyway? I know it's a signal telling me to hate someone but what particular hivemind is spreading this?

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Bros were dudes who liked to party.

That became Frat Bros who were obnoxious and loud guys who like to get drunk and party.

Eventually becoming Gym/Tech/Crypto Bros, which referenced the toxic masculinity and obnoxious nature of those two groups whose entire identity is the thing they bro’d.

Which in turn became a catch all suffix for groups/industries that are toxic/harmful.

No “hivemind” is spreading it, it’s just the evolution of slang and language in action.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Wolf of wall street movie and wall street bets subreddit probably.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] dipbeneaththelasers@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

No. And in this case it was probably an accountant or other operations worker in the company's treasury management department. Almost certainly not a finance bro.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 7 months ago

I tough it'll be some crypto influencer or someone like that, not just guy who works in finance.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Then what's a finance bro if not that? Lol

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Traders. M&A sharks. Crypto geeks. Balls out types.

Not a back office accounting drone.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Maybe if people hadn't made fun of me wanting to use pgp for all communications in the late 90s we could have avoided this. The fact that everything we do isn't subject to digital signature verification is nuts.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm still going to make fun of you. Nerd.

Plz fix things tho :(

[–] norbert@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Cypherpunk is still an ideology though obviously it never kept pace with the explosion of internet access. It's needed now more than ever.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

It should be as mainstream as a lock on your front door or presenting ID when warranted (and as easy).

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Fr pgp is so fucking useful I cannot stress it enough

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I will be your pgp pen pal if u want.

It also makes me sad all my emails to family / friends / services aren't encrypted.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The "-bro" suffix is rapidly heading into terminal overuse phase where it ceases to have any actual meaning any more.

And I for one am glad to see it go.

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

BroGate

Sorry, I agree completely but I couldn't resist. I hate the "-Gate" suffix too since it's equally asinine.

[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago

Abrogate brogate

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

What do you mean kbinbro

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 20 points 7 months ago

I like to think the whole story was made up and the employee stole the money for themselves.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

stealing money from rich people? OH NOES!

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Global oligarchs: these scammers are taking our jobs!!!

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A finance worker in Hong Kong hopped on a video call with, what appeared to be, multiple coworkers and his company’s Chief Financial Officer.

“(In the) multi-person video conference, it turns out that everyone [he saw] was fake,” Hong Kong Police official Baron Chan Shun-ching told media outlets on Friday.

Hong Kong’s police department did not publicly identify the company or the worker in this case, but it’s one of the largest financial scams with deepfake technology to date.

The meeting’s participants were digitally recreated using publicly available footage of the individuals, according to the South China Morning Post.

The Hong Kong police department noted this was one of many recent cases involving deepfake technology scams.

AI-generated, pornographic images of Taylor Swift went viral in January, while a deepfake President Biden told New Hampshire voters not to vote.


The original article contains 350 words, the summary contains 138 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Scamming scammers seems like good praxis. People need guides on how to do this