this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
26 points (84.2% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3619 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Welcome to a WEIRD week in Politics!

Thursday, 2/8 - Now with 54% reporting in the Nevada Caucus, Trump was declared the winner after just the first percent was in:

1% results:
Donald Trump - 97.6% - 362 votes
Ryan Binkley - 2.4% - 9 votes

54% results:
Donald Trump - 99.3% - 32,527 votes
Ryan Binkley - 0.7% - 235 votes

Tuesday, 2/6, marks the Nevada Primary where Nikki Haley is running primarily (!) against "None of the Above".

AP Results Page here, 88% counted:

https://apnews.com/ap-nevada-election-2024-results

On the Republican side, the AP has called "None of These Candidates" the winner.

None of These Candidates - 43,893 - 63.2%
Nikki Haley - 21,199 - 30.5%
Mike Pence - 2,752 - 4.0%
Tim Scott - 950 - 1.4%
John Castro - 235 - 0.3%

On the Democratic side, it's Biden all the way:

Joe Biden - 98,358 - 89.3%
None of These Candidates - 6,398 - 5.8%
Marianne Williamson - 3,173 - 2.9%
Gabriel Cornejo - 630 - 0.6%
Jason Palmer - 385 - 0.3%

Which, in the end, doesn't really matter because the delegates which determine who the party nominee are, are not apportioned by the state PRIMARY, they are determined in the state CAUCUS on Thursday, 2/8.

Trump is running largely unopposed in the Caucus.

We'll leave the megapost up long enough to cover both events.

Please keep all comments and posts related to the Primary and Caucus in this Megapost.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What's the point of the primary if it doesn't determine the party nominee?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

here is a WaPo article explaining the situation:

After decades of holding sparsely attended caucuses, which sometimes got messy and chaotic, Nevada legislators passed a law in 2021 requiring primary elections whenever more than one candidate was on the ballot. After more than a dozen candidates launched campaigns for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, Nevada officials scheduled a Republican primary for Tuesday.


But that 2021 law contained a big loophole.


“There has to be a primary, but the law doesn’t say how the party allocates their delegates” that who will count toward determining the winner of the Republican presidential nomination, said Rebecca Gill, a political science professor at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas.


That omission, combined with the intense lobbying of Nevada GOP leaders by former president Donald Trump, has led to a unique, and perhaps bewildering, scenario: Nevada this week will hold a state-run primary and party-run caucuses.

TL;DR: Nevada made a law to make the it easier for citizens to participate in the “select your party’s nominee” process, but it was written kinda poorly and has a huge loophole clearly contrary to the intent of the law, which the GOP is of course exploiting.

[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But why isn't Nikki Haley running in the caucus?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The Caucus was pushed specifically by Trump and Trump affiliated officials in Nevada.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

These are some elementary school level maneuvers...

[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did they block her from the caucus, or did she choose not to enter the caucus? If the former, how, and if the latter, why?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

From everything I read, the state sanctioned the Primary, then the party went behind everyones back to specifically set up the Caucus for Trump.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's not a lot to do in Nevada beyond gambling and hookers.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Someone should combine that and make bank...

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Trump already did and guess what? It was one of his many losses.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago

Call the establishment "slot machine" but have the top of the o broken so it flickers to a u.

[–] kat@pawb.social 2 points 7 months ago

Fascinating stuff

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

1% reporting in the Caucus and Trump is the winner. LOL.

Donald Trump - 97.6% - 362 votes
Ryan Binkley - 2.4% - 9 votes