this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
146 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

10012 readers
179 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When faced with the prospects of actually paying workers a far wage, these companies are doing everything they can to prevent it. Says a lot about their priorities.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"How are we supposed to pay slave wages if you force us to treat our ~~employees~~ independent contractors with a minimum level of decency? Think of the venture capital that could be lost if we don't become profitable!"

Glad to see these companies are flailing. If you can't afford to pay a minimum wage that keeps up with inflation then your company shouldn't exist.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

They’ll just do what they did in Cali and change the NY constitution to redefine “employee”

[–] MercuryUprising@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

So many tech companies use the independent contractor thing to get around having to pay taxes and provide benefits. It's pretty fucking gross

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, fuck those companies. Though I did love back when Grubhub was constantly cranking out these ridiculous offers to lure customers in. That was kinda nice...

[–] kostel_thecreed@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Same with skip, I remember there being 40-60% off coupons when they first started in my city.

[–] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I mean, it makes complete sense that they're fighting this hard once you realize their business models are only remotely viable because they exploit the fuck out of their workers.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The linked WaPo article has a little more detail. Here's the core of it:

DoorDash and Grubhub argue in a joint lawsuit that the rule is based on “inherently biased and unreliable survey data” and would hurt delivery drivers rather than help them.

If the rule goes through, the companies say, the increased costs would be passed on to consumers, which would result in fewer customers for delivery workers to deliver to and “injure its goodwill within the industry,” according to court filings.

In a separate lawsuit, Uber said the increased minimum wage would hurt local restaurants because the higher costs could dissuade customers from ordering.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Oh how I want to see this completely fail. And more importantly to see the steam coming out of their ears when it does.

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I can’t even imagine being that fucking evil.