this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
-26 points (24.0% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2330 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Jeremy Varon, a history professor at the the New School for Social Research in New York, said: “Part of me thinks that Biden has basically given up on reassembling on the Obama coalition and decided that the number that they lose among progressives and the young they will make up with [Nikki] Haley Republicans, moderates and independents.

“Since there’s no meaningful primary, he doesn’t have to appeal to the base. All of that makes for a campaign where he’s going to run to the centre and progressives are going to feel very much in the wilderness.”

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Biden was an establishment politician when Black Sabbath was performing War Pigs. He is still a better option than the competition. Nobody is going to step to the incumbent within his own party.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I'm about 95% positive OP (and a few other accounts that post very similarly toned content) are some kind of trolls operating to demotivate democratic voters. They never propose anything constructive, specific policies, or alternative candidates. They just dredge up any and every article that makes Biden look bad and cherry pick quotes to fit their narrative.

If they just don't like Biden, that's one thing; you can certainly dislike a politician. But OP et al don't seem to have any other agenda besides shitting on the presumed democratic candidate while saying "I'm not a Trump supporter" (paraphrased). Otherwise, they'd be drumming up support for (or at least mentioning) other candidates, asking people to contact their representatives and senators to support/oppose specific policies, etc.

Rather than anything constructive or proposing any kind of viable alternative, it's all "Biden bad", cherry-picked quotes, and childish name calling.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, OP's post history is pretty monotonously anti-Biden.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I'd block them, but then I'd miss out on reporting and down voting all their posts

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

Their post history mentions Newsom and how Democrats need another candidate. They also posted an article about air quality getting worse due to climate change.

I think it's a leftist who hasn't figured out the score yet.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

There are no other viable candidates when it's sitting President vs. former President.

The only thing that will stop either Biden or Trump is a major medical event or imprisonment. That's it.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

Sounds about right. Israel is going to usher in a Trump win.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 0 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


He came under scrutiny for a cosy relationship with the banking sector, his role in drawing up a 1994 crime bill that ushered in an era of mass incarceration and his failure to protect witness Anita Hill during Clarence Thomas’s supreme court confirmation hearing.

The Inflation Reduction Act directs $394bn to clean energy, the biggest such investment in history, and just last month the president ordered a pause on exports of liquefied natural gas, hailed as “a watershed moment” by activist and author Bill McKibben.

Meanwhile the president threw his weight behind a bipartisan Senate bill to tighten border security – and send military aid to Israel and Ukraine – which would severely curtail migration and limit asylum in a way that broke a campaign promise.

Activists in Dearborn, Michigan, for example, are urging people to cast an “Uncommitted” vote in the Democratic primary election on 27 February to demand that Biden support a ceasefire and end to funding the war in Gaza.

The backlash threatens Biden’s chances of re-election, not because progressives will switch from him to likely opponent Trump in decisive numbers, but because a sliver might choose to sit out the election or turn to a third party candidate such as Cornel West – potentially enough to make all the difference in Michigan and other swing states in the electoral college.

Jeremy Varon, a history professor at the the New School for Social Research in New York, said: “Part of me thinks that Biden has basically given up on reassembling on the Obama coalition and decided that the number that they lose among progressives and the young they will make up with [Nikki] Haley Republicans, moderates and independents.


The original article contains 2,046 words, the summary contains 281 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!