As soon as I saw the right wing conspiracy theories about KC winning, I knew something was going to happen if they won. It's such a sad state we're in when a sporting event is politicized.
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
158 points (96.5% liked)
News
23267 readers
3055 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sounds like it was a dispute between a handful of teens. Why these dumbasses decided to bang it out with all those people and cops around is beyond me.
Nothing can be done, says only nation where this happens regularly.
If there are no sharks, there are no shark fatalities.
Well, it is the USA after all. It is no good American party without some gun action, it seems.
Republicans fought against gun control legislation, they did nothing after Sandy Hook Elementary.
Republicans did nothing after Sandy Hook Elementary.
Republicans did nothing after 20 children aged six to seven years old were gunned down with a Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle at Sandy Hook Elementary.
Republicans will continue to do nothing.
Just remember, if you’re ever caught in the crossfire, thank a Republican. If you survive.
You want to live? You want to let your children go to school without worrying about them being killed by a mass shooter? You want to go to the grocery store and come back home alive? STOP VOTING FOR REPUBLICANS!!!!!! It is literally that fucking easy.
Carry on.
Republicans didn't do "nothing" after Sandy Hook, they did the most republican thing they could do: advocate for arming school children and staff.
Very true, I forgot about that part.
In a Reddit thread about this, someone got so mad when I pointed out they were wrong about the Sandy Hook shooter owning his guns, even though that'a a critical piece to implementing saner gun control: checks on the purchaser would have accomplished nothing here, as his mother bought the guns. You'd need to take a different approach, like free public mental health care (or repealing the second amendment, but that's much harder). One of the first steps toward even attempting saner gun control laws here is working out what's going wrong. shaking my head
Anyway. You are right, but not right enough. We need people like Bernie Sanders in charge if you want to see meaningful change in gun control.
Bernie wasn't much of an anti-2A advocate until he ran for the Democratic bid in 2016. Align with party values or get out.
Our country is sick. Healthcare is inaccessible and right out unaffordable, the Bible belt vilifies science, education is both piss poor and stupid expensive, we're the richest country on the planet but a tiny handful of grubs are hoarding all the wealth, something something preaching to the choir.
People wouldn't commit politically motivated domestic terrorism if living here wasn't made intentionally shitty by the people in charge. I want our planet to stop burning, but they're only focused on revoking trans rights or whatever fabricated problem they're whining about this week. Americans need to wake the fuck up and stop being so complacent.
I think it's more fruitful to address why people go on killing sprees instead of trying to prohibit the tools that they use.
To this day, it doesn't make sense for someone living in rural America to be against gun ownership because they have to rely on themselves for their own protection.
That said, there are legitimate arguments to be made for allowing cities to ban gun ownership.
Yeah, not really news is it?
How many shootings now this year already?
Some 75 people have been killed and 140 have been injured in the 44 mass shootings from Jan. 1 to Feb. 12, according to the Gun Violence Archive, which considers a mass shooting an incident in which at least four people, not including the shooter, are injured or killed.
But don't worry. Mass shootings stans will go, "Well askually it's not a mass shooting because..." So the number depends on if the person
It's not a mass shooting, it's just sparkling homicide
The REAL Mass shootings come from Massachusetts.
it is darkly hilarious to me that shooting one person or two people just doesn't count as a shooting any more.
Of course those count as shootings, just not mass shootings. There have always been too many shootings to count - especially in the 90s, mainly due to the war on drugs. There has been an uptick in "mass shootings" in recent years, mainly because we didn't differentiate them from "shootings" until relatively recently...
I mean, "mass shooting" used to colloquially mean a random act against the public. I feel like people still think it means that when they see stats like this, but practically all the shootings in this stat are from gang violence and organized crime. A drive-by is a mass shooting.
Not to downplay the severity of it, but I hope people aren't thinking that there have been ~45 Kroger type shootings this year already. Solutions that address crime like this are different than addressing sick, politically motivated domestic terrorists. Not to say we don't need a lot of both, though.
Did the gilded age of America ever truly end?
We're in the leaded age. Golden age is far in thw future.
44?! How many days are we into 2024? FML.
Today is 46. So we are actually behind (or ahead?) for the year
Oh don't worry, we'll make it up, I'm sure.
Damn
Very sad to see.