this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
546 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

5228 readers
1438 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 176 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I like that the reflections largely indicate that the text is sitting right on top of the water surface. And then you have this weird, non-euclidean, lowercase 'g' that completely demolishes the perspective.

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 82 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The lower half of the g is actually folded in a 90 degree angle and lying flat on the surface of the water, which also explains why it has no reflection. Truly a photo manipulation worthy of a first place.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 43 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

It really showcases that it's almost impossible to find the spot where that g is located.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

You ask me, I think that spot's mythical

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 2 points 9 months ago

Am I fucking bonkers or does the g not have a clear reflection on the lower half that totally breaks this take.

[–] Restaldt@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

No no the bottom half of the g is underwater and the light is being refracted

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What are you talking about; this image is legitimately quite a good effect for early-days photoshopping. It's not perfect, but it's perfectly fine for a student project with an enjoyable result.

The pure audacity of the "g", which in honesty couldn't have had anything else done with it without becoming even more jarring and interfering with the readability, only adds to the impact. 10/10

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Depending on when this was, that could have been pretty sophisticated. We wouldn’t think much of it now, but there was a time where I purchased expensive books on step by step instructions for wild text effects. We’d laugh at them now, but they were cutting edge in the 90s.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Removing backgrounds used to be a highly specialized skill that took hours, or plugins that cost hundreds of dollars. Same with eye and teeth touch-up. It's crazy how automated Photoshop stuff is these days.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Cutting things out of an even mildly noisy background was a pain in PS when j went to college

6 months ago I cut out a game character from a really noisy background using a free web based PS knockoff and it took like 5 minutes

I cried a little for the lost time past me had

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I just cut the background out using a free website two days ago! All I had to do was upload it, and some AI system recognized the people and knew how to cut them out. Oh, and it's built right into the Apple photo app now. They can just drag the people and they pop right off the background. It's amazing! I used to have to use the extraction tool, the pen tool, and hours worth of time to get hair cropped out looking realistic. We're living in the fuuuutuurre!

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 13 points 9 months ago

The drop shadow is so close but also somewhat distorted, it kind of adds to the comedic effect.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

won by not using comic sans

"seems right"

[–] infreq@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Me neither. Especially with that g

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Me neither. Maybe if you post the entire image instead of cutting off the bottom inch, there might be a clue.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

if you look at the corners, they probably did post the entire image. It's the screenshot that crops