this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
648 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4549 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A little over a week after a prosecutor in Georgia indicted former President Donald Trump for trying to overturn the results of the state’s 2020 presidential election, Republicans said they will use a new law to remove her from office.

In May, Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signed the law that created a new commission of political appointees with the power to remove and discipline elected prosecutors over decisions or policies not to prosecute certain offenses. The law seeks to limit or restrict reform-minded prosecutors. In the case of Fulton County — which includes Atlanta — though, District Attorney Fani Willis is not even known as much of a reformer. Instead, Republican lawmakers set their sights on Willis for another reason: prosecuting the wrong person.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 387 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sounds like obstruction of justice.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 305 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like the continuation of a coup.

[–] matchphoenix@feddit.uk 150 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like more individuals to indict with RICO charges

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is it RICO if these are all separate people committing crimes of their own accord?

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not a lawyer, but from the way the indictment was written it sounded like it was the mission that included you in the group, not the main person.

[–] BillTheTailor@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's how RICO works: you don't have to have committed the actual crime, but if your actions materially contributed to the commission of the crime, that's considered pretty much the same thing.

[–] TechnoBabble@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Georgia GOP is going to get itself caught up in federal RICO charges at this rate.

I wonder how that would work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

If it's done to perpetuate a conspiracy, maybe

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InisSieferI@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

It's never stopped after all.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Retaliation is a crime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] donut4ever@lemm.ee 239 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lol. Bruh. She didn't just indict him because she wanted to and for no reason, she had evidence of crimes committed by the dude and his monkeys. He was indicted by a grand jury. The "wrong person"? We are playing Mafia now? Wtf

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes they are. Kemp seems to have had all sorts of tricks up his sleeve to suppress voters. This "no you can't prosecute our people" committee is no great surprise to me.

The GOP will stop at nothing to ensure they can do whatever the fuck they want. Across the board in every way they can imagine they threaten to further degrade and eventually destroy democracy. For them, Russia is a model of what they're going for.

[–] Damionsipher@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

When does the whole second amendment kick in and people start using it to defend against authoritarian governments?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 180 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We already know from Pudding Rob's actions in Florida that these kind of laws are going to be used to:

  • Allow the executive or legislative branches to override the judiciary, thereby functionally eliminating the separation of powers

  • Override democracy by removing duly elected officials at the sole discretion of one person (Florida), or by another unelected body (Georgia)

  • Create a legal fiefdom where the executive or legislative branches can determine the outcome of judicial matters through sheer fiat by removing prosecutors who do not align with their intended outcomes, and then hand selecting those who do

Party of "Law and Order" my fucking ass.....

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 127 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's because "law and order" always meant "arrest black people".

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That’s completely unfair.

They’re happy to indiscriminately arrest brown people too.

[–] Kofu@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

They arrest Brown, murder Black.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

As well as LGBTQ people, and anyone else in the "out group".

[–] StarServal@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Law and order is, and was always, just another tool in their arsenal to be used against their opponents. It has never been about fairness or justice to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

And that governor is responsible for that law. Kemp fucked us.

They will remove her probably try get her charged and then work to have someone who will make this case go away.

If this happens and the people of Georgia or hell all of us to rise up and put stop to it.

Then might as well hand the country over to the fascist because that would have won.

This must not be allowed. But I knew the GOP would find away to protect Trump.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 130 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no honor- none whatsoever- in the Republican party.

They want power, and they will destroy any good person who stands in their way.

Disgusting.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

There hasn't been for a very, very long time.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago (2 children)

GOP - All obstruction, all the time

[–] Skwerls@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Oh, I'm pretty sure the P stands for projection, because they do plenty of that as well.

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 84 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They can't even start accepting complaints under this new law until next July, then it's a complicated process with two different panels of former prosecutors/judges, a number of whom are appointed by the not-particuarly-pro-Trump governor. It'll definitely be used to punish prosecutors for not prosecuting drug/abortion/etc crimes the way they want them to, but it's going to be too slow + indifferent + late to affect Willis.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure the GOP will find a way to make this one happen faster. Long before Trump can be tried.

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well not under this law, anyway - if they "find a way" it would be through some totally different method.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] newtraditionalists@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Thank you for pointing out this context.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you give me some sources for this it's not that I don't believe you but want to read about it because it has me worried

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's the actual bill text:

No complaint shall be filed before July 1, 2024.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 55 points 1 year ago

Expected outcome from the minute the law was passed. We'll see how far it gets...

[–] donnager@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course they are. I love how Trump and the GOP claim to be innoncent….yet they try and stop the prosecution. If you are innocent, just present the evidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theodewere@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

criminals cover up for one another every chance they get

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know that they have the votes to actually do this, even if one guy on a Facebook post said he wanted to.

If they did do it, the real question is how this duly elected official gets replaced. If it's a special election I'd disagree with them doing it but at least the voters get representation. If it's an appointment by the GovernornI think there are actual constitutional issues with the law since it denies the constituents the ability to elect their own DA...but that would also put a Republican in charge of the case so it seems plausible they would write it that way.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Ron Desantis is running like a bulldozer over Florida, I hope the federal government would step in. They seem to be trying to take a hands off approach and letting it sort out. I'm not sure that's a great approach as we watch our states get taken over by fascists. This happened after the civil war so I guess there's a chance we can get it back? That took a long time though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Obstruction of Justice

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Thats right Georgia. Republicans have told you who to vote for if you want your independence and freedom. Michigan just recently realized this.

[–] JoJoGAH@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

GOP is grasping at straws in Tennessee too, for all to see. Justin Pearson, previously censured, posts reels of every nefarious act they try. It bears watching and supporting.

[–] _bug0ut@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This doesn't mean that the trial can be shitcanned, does it?

If Fani Willis can't escape this and it means she burned her career to do the right thing, somebody oughtta crowdfund a bunch of money for her so she has some cushioning.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If she's replaced by the governor, yeah they could drop the case. I just doubt they'd be able to replace her without a court case all on it's own. For one it sounds like an unconstitutional bill of attainder.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›