42
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

No need for ideological and government ops (at least not yet), just a good misdirection of ideas from an unwitting person or grifter, that were decidedly purveyed around western liberal mass media, at face value or manipulated beyond originator's intent.

I don't wanna hear shit like "1984". Those were made with the intent to be blatantly anti-communist and pro-western

An example would include the Stanford prison experiments

It turns out that the cruelty exhibited by the guards was not spontaneous. On the contrary; the guards were coached beforehand by Zimbardo. And some of the prisoners have admitted that the distress they exhibited was faked.

(Note: lemme guess, someone gonna @ on how I'm ironically use pop culture to debunk pop culture. Yes, we do live in a society...)

Nonetheless, this study was one of many that solidified "human nature is inherently evil" sort of shticks...

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago
[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago
[-] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

my dad being responsible (and gay)

Does he tell you "good morning"?

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Now that I've thought of it, no. Just 'hey' or 'hello', just seems more casual that way, tbh...

[-] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 4 months ago

The saying "A Jack of all trades is a master of none." mostly because it implies that there isn't value in a diverse set of skills. My understanding is, however, that the whole saying is "A Jack of all trades is a master of none, but often times better than a master of one." It's unclear why this phrase was shortened, but you can't help but see how its usage in the media lends to the notion that one should specialize instead of generalize. Something that directly supports the higher education structure and track post primary school.

Personally, I've made a pretty successful go at generalizing within my field, so I definitely resonate with this one.


The concept of "Stockholm Syndrome". Britannica defines Stockholm Syndrome as follows:

Stockholm syndrome describes the psychological condition of a victim who identifies with and empathizes with their captor or abuser and their goals. Stockholm syndrome is rare; according to one FBI study, the condition occurs in about 8 percent of hostage victims

This concept is widely excepted as a kind of mental breaking, of someone doing something that would appear illogical or irrational. However, the coining of this notion stems from a bank robbery in Stockholm in 1973. I'll simply link to the backstory from Wikipedia, as it encapsulates the issue pretty well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome#Stockholm_bank_robbery

[-] blashork@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

You're wrong about the whole phrase/original phrase things. A lot of those are completely made with their only source being a random internet post. I gotta find the youtibe linguist video I saw debunking it, it was recommended to me from ian misali's tumblr. The jack of all trades was a particular one he made sure to note.

I think this onlymakes your point more interesting. Our society has shifted towards this specialization so much we've contorted old sayingd to have new meanings to fit the newer world, and then tried to pretend it was always the case.

[-] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 months ago

Damn I wasn't aware of that. If you find that video, let me know!

[-] blashork@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago
[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

I found YouTube links in your comment. Here are links to the same videos on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

Link 1:

Link 2:

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The movement towards CGI in film, while pioneered by studios such as LucasArts and Lightstorm, has mostly been driven by the ability to reduce movie insurance costs for actors and crew. When James Cameron especially pioneered CGI in film for Titanic, he saw CGI as a way to enhance physical props, models, and locations, bringing a physically shot scene alive with details. George Lucas, on the other-hand, saw a potential to create from whole-cloth entire worlds of imagination rendered entirely digitally. Insurance companies, on the other hand, saw the potential to completely reduce liability for physical shots. Why use a blank that can kill someone (cough Alec Baldwin cough) when you can use a digitally rendered blast. It's why a big part of Christmanism is looking for a comeback of squibs, to fight against the base of capitalism.

However, while it begins as a conscious move from the base it becomes an unconscious move because eventually this mentality begins to seep into everything, as people are trained with these new techniques, old ones are forgotten, which influences what stories are told and how they are told. And it's not always all bad. Suddenly everyone was obsessed with multiverse theory in film because we could use these now well understood and widely taught CGI techniques to create these different spaces more affordably and 'real' than actual physical spaces ever could, which also converged with everyone feeling like everything is getting shittier from the base and attempting to imagine a better world, this reflecting the sentiment of the base in the superstructure, using techniques created by the base that had seeped into the superstructure.

It's all very cool, very nerdy stuff.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

Props to you, man!

That being said, I guess we're going to meet an 18th Brumaire version of the CGI-usage issue, through A.I.... sadness-abysmal

(I should read that work I mentioned...)

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

Is insurance part of the base? Seems very close to law (it's fundamentally a contract about who pays out damages if there's an accident that could result in litigation), or in its broadest sense finance (insuring against an unlikely-but-costly scenario).

I think you're right that CGI is a good example, though, it's just that the base part is the actual technological advancements that underpin the field.

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Generally speaking I think it is, because a level of insurance, which is just risk calculation, except under this system it is risk calculation with the profit motive, will likely exist under any system. It doesn't particularly matter to me, the tech comes first, but the particular application of the tech is driven by the assessment based in profit motive, not further development of the tech in concert with other technology and aesthetic.

[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Flat earthers becoming a thing and the book 'The World Is Flat' by Tom Friedman published in 2005.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_Is_Flat

marx-joker

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

Wait, how did the flat-earthers turn right-libertarian et crazy in vibes.... usually, they'd be more neolib-brained (more cold et calculating, yet respected by most capitalists)

Guess pop culture turns them into people like that...

[-] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The idea that handcrafted goods are superior to factory-made ones. In our society this perception is primarily driven by two things: that cheap goods are always factory made (because it simply isn't economical to handcraft IKEA-tier furniture), and that hand-crafted goods often have to justify their increased price by being luxury items (since luxury items' prices are a lot less tied to their inputs than other classes of commodities). Something made by hand isn't necessarily better than something made by a machine, but there's certainly a recurring idea that it is in pop culture.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

You figure that's the origins of DIY? Seems like it'd make a good explanation of that trend...

[-] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

I think DIY is something that's always been with us. Heinlein was right about exactly one thing: specialization is for insects.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

The division of labor has been a disaster for the human race - Karl Kaczynski... (lmao)

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22586 readers
473 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS