119
submitted 4 months ago by Tukma@lemmy.cafe to c/news@lemmy.world
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] qooqie@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago

Yeah that’s too long unfortunately. Hunger and lack of medical care are going to kill so many that maybe it was part of the plan all along to make it easier to deny

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

This was a bad idea along with the airdrops. All because Biden is unwilling to pressure Netanyahu publicly or set any red lines. So now he’s trying to scramble to give aid to one and bombs to another rather than do the simpler move of reigning one side in and allowing them to send in aid. International law says that Israel is required to allow this aid in or help, and they are doing neither.

[-] BothsidesistFraud@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah this seems crazy. We should just require Israel to set forth and protect a humanitarian corridor. We have a ton of leverage against Israel.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Because they are Muslim and brown. The US doesn't have a stellar reputation of being kind to brown people. So no wonder we are quicker providing bombs for Israel then we are on giving aid to Gaza.

If not voting Biden didn't give us Trump (who be 1000% worse) then I would do anything I could to make sure Biden loses in November. But nope I live here and have to hold my nose and vote Biden even though he a terrible human and fucking bad president.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Didn't take 2 months and 1000 troops to sell weapons to Netanyahu.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Probably less

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

That's still pretty quick if it's capable of supporting large trucks and long enough to allow cargo ships to dock next to it. It's probably a week or so to get the materials to construct it on site.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Can’t they like put the cargo on smaller boats and take it to shore?

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Well for one Israel won't let Americans put boots on the ground so that's makes it very difficult already.

But even if they could, their best option would be to get an amphibious assault ship in the area and use that to transfer small trucks but that would probably tske just as long or longer to tranfer to the area and even working as fast as possible 24/7 they would really struggle to get a decent amount of aid into gaza and would probably be less than they could airdrop.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

They could, it just slows delivery for every transfer.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Could those 1000 troops not just use the Rafah crossing to bring things directly in? Israel would be fucking daft to fire on US troops distributing aid.

[-] juicy 4 points 3 months ago

Daddy Netanyahu told Biden no

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 5 points 3 months ago

Too bad we’re not at war with them or it could get done in 48 hours.

[-] reddithalation@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 months ago

2 months seems like a reasonable timeline for a large infrastructure project halfway across the earth from the us. ofc its a horrible situation and they could save a lot more lives if they could just truck aid in.

[-] juicy -1 points 3 months ago

They can just truck aid in, but they won't because Biden either is spineless or he just doesn't care about the babies dying of hunger.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago

2 months? There HAS to be a better and faster way to build this. Seriously, just interlinking floating pre-made shit. It's like Lego.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
119 points (96.9% liked)

News

21752 readers
3300 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS