this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024

150 points (95.7% liked)

Interesting Global News

2633 readers

354 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.

Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
!technology@lemmy.zip - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Interesting articles, projects, and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.
!europe@feddit.org - News and information from Europe.

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

150

California sheriff releases bodycam video of killing of boy, 15, holding gardening tool (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 8 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Outrage over killing of Ryan Gainer, shot three times on Saturday, as sheriff denounced for defending deputies’ use of lethal force

Archived version: https://archive.ph/50wkz

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 49 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I think shooting someone trying to attack you with a hoe generally counts as self-defense, but I don't understand why

“The use of a Taser in this situation with the amount of time or the use of pepper-spray would not have been something we would have been able to react to quick enough. Ultimately we have to stop this problem … law enforcement officers are not required to be hit over the head with something. What happens when they get incapacitated? … The deputies followed through with what their training protocols are.”

This seems like exactly the situation tasers are meant for. Even if attempting to use a taser would have been riskier for the deputies, IMO accepting a reasonable amount of risk is part of their job. "Take the risk of confronting an aggressive teenager, but not the further risk of attempting to subdue him non-lethally" isn't where I would have the line drawn.

[–] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago

That statement also admits that this is in line with protocol, Idk who in their right mind would call a protocol acceptable where 3 guys show up to a distress call with guns and can’t manage to deescalate one kid with a hoe without loss of life.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

The question I'm asking is:

Why is there no time for a taser or pepper spray? Those should release just as quickly and easily as a firearm. Moreover, I'm rather confident I could take someone coming at me with a gardening tool, and I'm no police officer. Sure, don't risk a physical altercation, though at what point did that situation warrant the use of a firearm?

And a taser holds little real risk for the officer firing it. Hell, even a gun can have issues.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

But in your first sentence you clarified this is okay. No change will happen until you, and every other American, change that thinking.

You don’t understand why a cop killed a kid in a country that will do backflips in order to find justification for said violence?

It’s only one small step from advocacy of a taser to advocacy of a gun.

[+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Tasers are not as effective as a gun. If you are fighting for your life you take no chances.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And if this were a story about some random person defending themselves I might agree, but it's not. It's about a police officer who supposedly has the physical fitness and training to take the extra risk of using less than lethal options.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They say that tasers are not reliable. Plus police also have guns, so if a person with a hoe knocks you out (because taser failed), it can get possession of the gun and can start killing others.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They say that tasers are not reliable.

That says they shouldn't have tasers.

it can

"It"?

get possession of the gun and can start killing others.

That says they shouldn't have guns.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago

“It” is obviously a typo.

The police should have tasers for the case when a person is aggressive but does not have a weapon, like a haw.

In places like UK it is indeed makes sense for police not to have guns on police . But in US, population has lots of guns, so, it is not realistic.

[–] 520@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A taser would have been enough. That 15 year old kid wouldn't be able to shrug off a taser.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago

Tasers can fail to go off, miss, not attach, or even be dodged besides some people not being affected. If somebody has what is effevely a knife on a pole and they're that close it's one and done. The most effective force to use is a gun.

[–] ParetoOptimalDev 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pull out both and position taser like flashlight?

Pull taser out immediately to reduce time drawing it if their is slight indication of violence.

I'm not sure someone running at you with a gardening tool counts as fighting for your life.

Police around the world manage not to shoot people in these situations.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago

It was basically a knife of a pole. It's a long reach weapon and most gun instructors will tell you even at 21 feet a hand to hand weapon may have the advantage over a gun. Best not to have potential weapons at the ready when confronting police. This is all armchair quarterbacking at this point anyway. It was a heat of the moment reaction.

[–] johnlobo@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

american cop is such a wuss, southeastasian cop handle crazy machete guy without even touching their gun.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is a tragic story and I'm against police brutality as much as anyone, but it feels a little sensationalist to word a news article title this way. "Holding a gardening tool" makes me picture someone who was just minding his own business and planting flowers, but a quick google search shows him trying to attack the officers with a garden hoe.

Shame on The Guardian for muddying the waters to try to farm clicks from a terrible situation.

[–] blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yet almost every other police force in the world would've handled this without shooting him...

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. It's a serious problem, but the discussion gets so muddied by websites with low integrity running headlines that are intentionally dishonest, just for clicks. They know they'll get more outrage and $$ by wording it this way, and it's gross behavior.

How many people across the web do you think saw this headline and assumed, like I did before looking into it, that this was another case of police mistaking some harmless object for a gun? Probably lots.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Glad to see TPM’s got reasonable takes :)

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks. It's rare that I even comment on stuff that I know is going to be a divisive topic, because people get so worked up and it's hard to have a human conversation.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It was a hula hoe - basically a stick. It was not the kind of hoe with a blade. They killed a kid that they knew was in a mental health crisis for running at them with a stick.

They could have tackled him. They could have tased him. They could have pepper sprayed him. They could have tried entering the home more gently and used de-escalation practices like most medical professionals use. If a patient in crisis picks up an IV pole and threatens hospital workers with it, their response is not to shoot the patient three times.

This is an American cop problem, period.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bodycam Footage: 17 seconds

Piped Mirror

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This sucks, y’all

[–] ParetoOptimalDev 4 points 8 months ago

1st frame should be back up and get ready to taze.

[+] tygerprints@kbin.social -15 points 8 months ago (5 children)

It is not possible to know when you are confronted with coming at you holding a tool in a threatening manner whether or not he's autistic or "having a mental health crisis." An officer cannot afford to sit and wait to see if the attacker strikes him in the skull first.

I'm not saying this couldn't have been handled better and it should have been - but I can understand how it happens. Taking a reasonable amount of risk has to be balanced with instantaneous assessment of whether this person who's on a rampage is about to strike you or a family member in a lethal way. This may not be the happiest outcome, but people need to stop instantly criticizing every move the police make.

If YOU were the officer standing there having to make a snap judgment, you very likely would do the same thing, even if you think you wouldn't.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

Why were the officers even there?

A nation whose only recourse to it citizenry having mental health crises is sending men to shoot them is a damned one.

Take some that change you're clanging 'round to buy local sheriffs F-18s and equip nurses and counselors with bearsuits and a living wage.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Then why is the US the only country where this kind of thing happens so regularly that every time a story like this comes out, I have to wonder if it’s about a new one or the last one? Cops shot a guy in his backyard for holding a cell phone.

American police are on a literal hair trigger for lethal violence, especially against minorities, and most especially against African Americans. They are taught that their lives are in constant danger, and their use of force regulations are ridiculously loose. There’s even an entire training course for law enforcement called “killology.”

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

It's a good thing they have like 4 different "less lethal" methods to handle that sort of thing. Oh wait they just shoot you dead and get a paid vacation until everyone forgets. Great system.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

standing there having to make a snap judgment, you very likely would do the same thing

If a police officer is as likely as me to freak out and fuck up in an emergency, they don't have the required training or character to do their job.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, I would not do the same thing if I were an officer. I just feel like this needs to be said. Not everyone is seeking to preserve their own life at the expense of others.

I'm sick of cops acting like they are supposed to do this. It's in direct opposition to the reason we pay them hazard pay.