this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
1023 points (97.1% liked)

Atheist Memes

5626 readers
3 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 140 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I've been to the Grand Canyon three times, even hiked it once. While it is a sight to behold, it never once made me start believing in a deity.

Edit: The other part goes without saying.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 61 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's because, as it's often the case, the jump from "The Grand Canyon is beautiful -> An higher intelligence must have created it" is not a logical conclusion, but rather the rationalization of a preconceived belief.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It reminds me of the first time I went to the US. Of course I got to be seated in the plane next to some religious nutjob. So he looks through the window at some clouds below us and turning to me "isn't god's creation amazing?".

As I had little experience with his kind, I didn't comment (which, luckily, was the right answer).

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You avoided the bait. I wouldn't have been that wise.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He mostly took me by surprise. It's something nobody sane would ever say in Europe.

Later during that trip, I had another surreal exchange in a little nowhere place. We were stopped in the centre of a little village, wondering where we could find some kind of restaurant, but the place was utterly empty. Presumably there might have been some kind of mall or something in the area, but we hadn't spotted it.
Anyway a local helpfully came and told us that he had no idea where a restaurant was, but maybe there was one at some other village 30 km away. And also were we Christians?

Um, what?

For then we shall meet again in heaven.

So I mumbled something along the lines that the whole Christian thing wasn't really all that hot in Europe any longer, and wished him luck with his heavenly endeavours, and we got the fuck out of there.

I met a few of those guys, but that one was the weirdest.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

He mostly took me by surprise. It's something nobody sane would ever say in Europe.

There was this guy in my commute train once. Before he got out he was like "God loves you all!" in utter bliss. Everyone was silent and after a few seconds of processing i got a "good for you" out.

[–] FiniteBanjo 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Wouldn't the existence of anything which formed over 80 million years directly contradict every creationist theory from established religious texts? I can't imagine seeing the layer of 270 Million year old Limestone and thinking "How wild that God made this 5,000 years ago with such sophistication" like that's just asinine.

[–] xpinchx@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Lol my thoughts exactly... I've also been, it's literally a testament to geological change over time and rich in archeological significance from the natives that once lived there.

Also having been to many national parks it's not even the most impressive imo, even in the area. I thought Bryce Canyon was cooler 🤷‍♂️

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

They think it was carved from the earth by sky daddy and his flying elves and just made to look like it was millions of years old because they like to confuse people and self-sabotage apparently.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 130 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Nature can be beautiful without attributing it to God. Everyone must have seen beautiful mountains, lakes, rivers, canyons, etc.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 100 points 9 months ago (3 children)

That's what I don't get.. seeing all the earth's wonders and knowing it took millions of years and all these geological processes to create impresses me much more than "some guy" zapping it into existence.

[–] DillyDaily@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The fact that all of this is beauty was formed through completely random powers of haplenstance is far more impressive to me than someone's imaginary friend creating it.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I find it funny when Christians say that everything is far too complex to have happened at random and it must have been designed by a deity. Bitch, God doesn't know Math.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

what you don't like the dino-bone-forgeries that ~~god~~ satan must have planted to deceive people into thinking the earth is older than it really is?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 39 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's also incredibly human centric even though it borrows from humility, like look at this awesome sight this thing that is bigger than me, that was put here for me to experience!

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's also incredibly harmful to see the world as a possession made for you. We are not masters of the earth, we're stewards. It is our home, and we treat it like our slave because we believe it was made for us. We were made by it. We are sustained by it. The same natural processes that have created all the wonders we can behold have cradled our development and nurtured our growth. And like a petulant, entitled child, we demand more.

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Skill issue. Learn how to terraform and make weather controlling satellites.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 95 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That maxim, "There are no atheists in foxholes," it's not an argument against atheism — it's an argument against foxholes.

- James Morrow

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"If it can be said that there are no atheists in foxholes, then it can certainly be said there are no theists at funerals."

One of the most brutal lines spoken by Mr.Deity lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] capital@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Weird then that theists are typically not the ones concerned with preserving that natural beauty.

For them, god put that oil down there for us to extract and burn. Nature be damned.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Tbh I think this one's on the Bible. It does say that we are the Shepherd of God's creation or something, and I guess a shepherd is technically allowed to exploit the fuck out of their flock 🤷

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

that they choose to interpret this as "give a fuck about nothing at all" is one of the biggest problems people have with christians.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Grand Canyon is proof that the world isn't 5000 years old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 32 points 9 months ago (6 children)

It bothers me that they didn't angle the text to the wall, have pride in your work memers

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Well. now it bothers me. jerk.

(lol. I didn't notice it until I read your comment. now i can't not notice it.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My mom is a strong believer in God, and claims that she and I surviving my birth is proof enough. Her body rejected me at 28 weeks because our blood has different rh factors. She went into eclamptic seizures and I had to be surgically removed. We both almost died. I was an incredibly sickly child. At one point, my mom was as looking into signing me up for Make a Wish, because so many people, my mom included, thought I was just going to die. I was that unhealthy. My left lung has permanent scar tissue from having pneumonia so much when I was younger. You can still see it clearly on x-rays. My lungs weren't fully developed until I was 19. Doctors were tracking their development to make sure I wouldn't need any extra care as an adult.

Now I'm an adult who is relatively healthy considering all of the debilitating ailments I have, most likely a direct result of being born early. My mom says it's a miracle and a blessing from God that I survived and am as successful as I am. I don't think it's any of that shit. I think it's modern medicine and my desire to succeed to spite people who've wronged me. God ain't got shit on antibiotics and spite.

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

If god did miracles and all that jazz to make you survive, couldn't he just... Not make you premature?

Oh wait. I remember. God works in mysterious ways

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

To be fair, it's hard to be a Christian or someone who presumes a benign creator when looking at children's wards or the overrepresentation of children and youth in disaster, plague and famine mortality.

As a player and occasional programmer of sims and models, the degree of suffering in the universe is compatible with a creator when the well being of the individual units (or even species) are not a goal.

If the objective is drama and entertainment, creation as Reality TV, where Anyone Can Die™ then mountains of dead babies is all part of the show.

No, what makes it hard to be a theist is how everything is procedural. None of the life around us looks like a pocket-watch made by an artisan. It looks like a pocket-watch made by generative AI, itself programmed by generative AI, itself programmed by generative AI. We aren't the Sims, we're the dead drunken cats in taverns who got alcohol poisoning from spillage on the floors ingested when cleaning ourselves.

This doesn't entirely disprove intelligence creating the universe, of course. The simulation hypothesis is still valid, but we can expect God to be more like Azathoth ( Long may be slumber ) than Adonai. And we are microbes in the tree bark of a single Sequoia Redwood in central California, rather that God's chosen. Heck, if there is a divine purpose to the universe ( ꜰᴏʀᴛy ᴛᴡᴏ ) then we are just as likely incidental to its function, or even an emergent antagonistic side effect thanks to the chaos of complexity, than we are a critical element of its function.

But then, You are a redundant functionary in God's great machine to prepare Its morning breakfast does not sell people into your organized money-driven religious ministry.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Alan Watts basically argued reality was a play one put on for themselves.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When you look at a sunset you are having an emotional reaction to what you are seeing.

Emotions are not real. They do not Exist outside of your head. And therefore cannot be evidence of anything except that you can imagine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] 520@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Does it mean 'no worries for the rest of your days?'

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why are people floored into faith by the scale of the Grand Canyon, when they can just look up at the sky, and see a gigantic rock that has been falling towards us for millions of years, and feel the heat from the nearby (in cosmic terms) star which is an accumulation of hydrogen so massive that it's gravity alone has enough force to sustain a fusion reaction? But a trough in the ground caused by flowing water, that gotta be the work of god.

Not to downplay the Grand Canyon. It sure does look amazing!

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree with rhe sentiment but small correction, the moon is falling away from earth.

[–] reinei@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Well that might depend?

Because as far as orbital mechanics are concerned it's falling toward us (because that's what orbiting usually involves) but because the orbit is slowly getting larger it's falling is slowed, maybe? Well can't really be that because the speed should be pretty constant?

Huh, that's kinda a hard thing to answer comprehensively for someone who didn't take that astrophysics course everyone else took...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Skanky@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I can't remember who said it, but it's a great thought...

Looking at all the beauty of the Earth, the ocean, the forests, mountains and every living creature, then looking to the moon, the sun, all the planets, the stars, galaxies, with a seemingly endless amount of space and possibilities...

With all this, why do religious people feel like that's not enough? Is that not grand enough for you already? Why does there have to be something greater?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago

E...ro...sion??? Must be God!

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Those children have all sinned and god is vengeful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It should also be said, "It's hard to be a Theist when you're taking a stroll through a cemetery with 100+ year old tomb stones where every other one is a dead child."

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago

In a pre-modern science era, religion really makes sense for these people.

I couldn’t imagine losing a child. Let alone more than one. And then having absolutely no understanding of why? I consider myself and atheist and a cynic, but in the shoes of a pre-industrial revolution parent…I may not be able to accept “god has a reason”, but I could absolutely accept “they are in heaven”.

Nowadays it’s inexcusable. Childhood mortality is incredibly low, especially from non-accidental causes like disease. MCs are less frequent due to improved societal factors (diet, stress, exercise, prenatal care, etc), and we can identify the causes a shockingly high percentage of the time.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago

Yeah I do not get it.

Like this bridge collapse in Baltimore this morning. All over facebook, praying hands and people claiming they're going to pray for the victims. If you thought that worked, why wouldn't you pray that no one would be on the bridge at that moment? Why wouldn't you pray that no ships hit the pier of the bridge? Surely those two things would be within God's power.

I used to see an SUV near work that had a vinyl cut on the rear window that said something like, "so-and-so, 1978-1998 - God cured his pain and called him to heaven". In other words, no matter what, God comes out on top - either he's cured and look how great God is for curing him! Or he dies and look how great God is for ending his suffering!

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Adding "fucking" to the retort makes it funnier

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

B-b-but b-but they are closer to heaven than any of us! /S

load more comments
view more: next ›