this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
112 points (95.9% liked)

Selfhosted

39386 readers
183 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it one that you just use and works just fine? Or one that has proven to be reliable and responsible if they do a mistake and only want to satisfy you as a customer?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mosfar@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m using PorkBun and I’m happy with them

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I second this. They're upfront about pricing and don't have many different products so the interface isn't overwhelming.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Porkbun's competitively priced, easy to use, and the name is a great reference for Sleeping Dogs to me. What's not to like?

[–] WingedObsidian@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago

This is who I use as well. I’m happy w them

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
CGNAT Carrier-Grade NAT
DNS Domain Name Service/System
IP Internet Protocol
NAS Network-Attached Storage
NAT Network Address Translation
SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption

6 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 7 acronyms.

[Thread #108 for this sub, first seen 5th Sep 2023, 14:05] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] Skyline@lemmy.cafe 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cloudflare works really well and has a good UI. Namecheap also works well, but it takes more clicks to adjust DNS records.

[–] DetachablePianist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

+1 for Cloudflare.

That said, there are a number of folks rightfully concerned about the sheer mass of information Cliudflare has access to through their Content Delivery Network (their primary service). This raises potential privacy concerns, especially for self-hosters, who tend to prefer not to rely too heavily on any one large company. However, you don't actually have to use their CDN service to make use of their minimally-priced Registrar functionality, and personally I really appreciate the services they offer. Their free tier is really impressive, and incredibly useful.

[–] Inktvip@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

For some reason every registrars dns panel has its own weird restrictions, bugs and interface quirks. Pointing the nameservers to Cloudflare at least makes for a consistent experience.

[–] Moc@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

For the frugal sysadmin, Free DNS!

[–] viperex@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Looks like consensus is NameCheap or PorkBun

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been with namecheap.com for over a decade and I have no complaints

[–] CetaceanNeeded@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm with namecheap, they are considerably better than my last registrar.

[–] ngoomie@pawb.social 8 points 1 year ago

I recently switched to Porkbun from Namecheap specifically because I found Namecheap's "advanced DNS" settings to be somewhat excruciating to use, plus I also (finally, after doing it manually for a good few years) got around to setting up Certbot autorenewal, and there's not really a good way to do DNS challenges for autorenewal with Namecheap. Just generally I find Porkbun's UI to be very simple and streamlined without actually hiding anything from me. I also found that my domain renewal prices went down with the switch, something I didn't even consider when switching.

That being said, Porkbun and Namecheap are literally the only domain registrars I've used. For all I know there could be something out there I'd prefer way more.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Switched to Cloudflare since they had spots, never been unhappy.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

gandi.net , didn't haven't to pay for any privacy bullshit like whois masking, and all that stuff is enabled by default. I like them as a company.

[–] dyc3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I currently renew my domains on namecheap and manage the records on cloudflare. Namecheap's web interface is trash (doesn't work in Firefox for no reason) and I dread every time I have to touch it. I'm currently considering just moving the registrations to cloudflare too.

[–] Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same. Their API is now too slow for LetsEncrypt DNS challenges. :(

Cloudflare is great though.

[–] alphapuggle@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I just moved my registrar from namecheap to cloudflare since they started supporting .dev domains and it's infinitely better. Was already using them for the dns challenges cuz I'm not paying for SSL certs.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Leave the registration with NC and move the DNS to cloudflare. You should separate the two functions anyway so you have fallback ability for both. If the DNS is borked, you can go back to the registrar and change name servers, and if the registrar is down, it doesn't affect your DNS.

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I the only one using iWantMyName.com?

Like some of the others described here, I like that their ui is dead simple and easy to navigate, once a year when I have to renew. And their prices seem to be middle tier.

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use them right now, but I’ve been disappointed lately and I’m considering moving away. They’re more expensive than other options and you have to contact customer service for some things, but their response times are pretty slow. E.g., they don’t have an interface to add glue records, so you have to ask them to do it… when I did this it took them a couple days to get back to me, and they forgot to add the IPv6 records too. My other domains are registered elsewhere (for cheaper) and they just had an interface to do this and it happened instantly. I keep running into problems like this with iwantmyname and it’s been kind of frustrating. I had problems with their name servers dying for a bit recently too… I was happy with them for years, but they’ve caused enough problems for me lately that I’m wondering why I’m paying extra for them.

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny you posting on this older comment of mine today - I am in the midst of a support case with them. We'll see how it turns out!

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They usually get it sorted out pretty well, but their response times can be a little slow. It’s potentially not a huge deal for you, and overall they’ve been okay… this is sort of understandable because they’re in New Zealand and seem to want to make sure their support staff are paid well (though they were bought by a larger company recently, so I'm not sure if this still holds, seems like it did as of 2019, though):

This makes them seem like a cool company, and I'd like to support them... But despite that I do feel a little disappointed paying more for a worse service, and I think they really need to invest in providing interfaces for some of the more advanced DNS settings, particularly if their customer support is going to be limited by their own admission.

They also have some blog posts about customer service that give me some weird vibes...

Definitely in support of their customer service team in this example, and don't want them to be treated poorly or sworn at or anything... But it's a little weird to put this on blast like this and I think it'd be a better look to just leave it at "these are the things that would help us help you, we need to make sure accounts are secure so we can't just ignore passwords, etc etc"

And it's also a little weird that they have this post complaining about some web-hosts poor interface and customer service too:

Neither of these are particularly bad, but I guess it makes me a bit disappointed that I've run into similar problems with them, and I'm not sure they're doing enough to address things on their end.

I don't think I'd tell anybody not to use them because they have been good for the most part, but they're not as fully featured as other registrars in my experience, and they're more expensive.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use porkbun because i can and do pay with crypto to renew my domain.

[–] Arrayrepairman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does porkbun support dynamic DNS and subdomain? Looking to move from Google and that's a requirement for me.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly, i am not sure

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not Gandi. They were very reliable since the beginning of the internet but they sold the company and went downhill since.

[–] jawsua@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Aw man, I had no idea they sold

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hitagi@ani.social 4 points 1 year ago

I really want to say Gandi but they charge too much now and removed the free mailboxes.

Anyway, I'll vouch for Netim. Their prices are similar to (old) Gandi and they have a mailbox too. I'm looking into Spaceship for some other domains because they're really cheap.

[–] t0m5k1@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I purchase from the cheapest and use he.net for my nameservers.

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was wondering if somebody was going to mention the he nameservers :). I couldn’t figure out how to get them working, but it seems like a good option! I want to figure out if I can use them as backup nameservers in addition to my own at some point…

[–] t0m5k1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not all domain providers will allow you to change the nameservers of a domain they sold to you as they want to sell you the rest of what you need for extra $$$

You can only have 2 name servers on a domain and it is not advisable to make them point to different DNS providers as they will both need to be authoritative and by having 2 different providers will mean you get 2 different SOA which will break fundamental DNS.

to change the nameservers will either be simple or hard, depending on the domain name provider it might take 24 hours for them to change the name servers or they may allow you to change them via web UI which could be just a 2 hour wait.

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s pretty common to be able to use your own nameservers. The only registrar that doesn’t allow this afaik is cloudflare. I’m sure there’s probably others that don’t allow this, but most that I have seen seem to allow you to use your own nameservers.

Why do you say you can only have 2 nameservers? I’m sure not all registrars / TLDs will support it, but you can certainly have more than that. I’ve personally had 5 before, but I’m pretty sure you can have even more.

I believe Hurricane Electric allows you to do zone transfers to their nameservers, so I think in theory you can use their nameservers as additional backups. The SOA records will match too because of this, but even if you did something crazy like manage RRs on different nameserver providers without zone transfers I don’t think this would be a problem (well, aside from it getting out of sync unless you’re really careful). The SOA records are mostly used for zone transfers afaik and resolvers won’t really care about them, so even if they don’t match everything should work, no?

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 4 points 1 year ago

I've always used OVH. They are reputable, always been responsive to my questions and have an API to handle many things, including domain names, which is handy for DNS-01 challenges with Caddy and libdns.

[–] ClemaX@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Currently namecheap, but I was pretty mad to see that API access (for ACME DNS record auth, which I need to prevent downtime) was not available due to my yearly plan being too cheap (?!). You need to spend at least 50$ per months or have at least 20 domains for no good reason.

The best solution seems to acquire the domain using namecheap and then transfer name servers to a better service.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I usually pick whoever has the best deal when I want to register a domain.

[–] bmck@lemmy.bmck.au 3 points 1 year ago

AWS Route53. Lets me keep all my domains in one place. If Cloudflare did .au I’d switch to that.

[–] hodgepodgehomonculus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dnsimple for me. Swapped from GoDaddy like 10 years ago and haven't really felt the need to explore elsewhere, the costs are pretty good and never had any issues.

[–] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AWS (Route53 specifically). Not common but my personal lab runs on AWS so it's nice to have a place for everything.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

ClouDNS.net... I mean, it works.

[–] dipshit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

name.com usually because I’m too dumb to remember any other domain name.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1984.hosting, because it's the only one I know that does not require you to run any propietary software.

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a domain name and vps are two different things?

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

They have domains too, but very little choice. Still looking for proper domain registar in this style.

https://www.inwx.com

Feature rich and never had an issue with them. Prices are fine imho.

load more comments
view more: next ›