this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
289 points (93.4% liked)

News

23397 readers
3651 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

He also called on Israel to take immediate steps “to address civilian harm, humanitarian suffering, and the safety of aid workers” and “made clear that U.S. policy with respect to Gaza will be determined by our assessment of Israel’s immediate action on these steps,” according to the White House statement.

archive.is link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Marafon@sh.itjust.works 65 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Finally.

I wonder if the recent news stories about "Lavender" and Israel's grotesquely high acceptable civilian casualty rates had any bearing on this seeming shift in policy.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 49 points 7 months ago (2 children)

no doubt the IDF indiscriminately blowing up aid workers has something to do with it

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 42 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Western aid workers, most importantly.

Over 100 aid workers have been killed since last October, but the others weren't nearly as newsworthy due to being of Arab descent.

In circumstances eerily similar to the recent drone strikes on WCK, aid workers and medical staff working with Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) were bombed and killed by Israeli forces even though they had notified the IDF of their location, and their convoy was fired upon as they tried to evacuate workers and their families from northern Gaza.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

but the others weren't nearly as newsworthy due to being of Arab descent.

You may want to add an “apparently” to that or I’m afraid it could be taken the wrong way…

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How fucked that indiscriminately blowing up children isn't sufficient, but I'll take whatever positive progress possible.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

Probably not as much as an American citizen being killed by Israel on Monday, unfortunately.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Probably more likely the recent WSJ polls showing him losing his ass across all swing states. He's a cipher. He'll just move with the numbers.

Its not like the absurdity of Israels ongoing genocide stopped him before; philosophically, Biden basically is a Zionist. He's one of the most pro-Israel Democrats there is.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/03/trump-biden-polls-2024-00150322

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This will be a bit of a tangent, but I can't believe people approved of Trump's time in office. Are people's memories that short? Every day was something else crazy. He basically caused this economic crisis by messing with the money in dumb ways, killed an Iranian general almost dragging us into a war, worsened this crisis in the Middle East, kids in concentration camps being separated from their families, unbelievable high amounts of corruption and turnover, impeached twice, botched Covid because they were mad at blue cities and didn't like governing, and it ended with an attempted coup. It just never ended. Every day was something new and stressful. 51% of people saying they approved of Trump's time in office from that article you posted just blows my mind. Just shows how dire straights America is in, how strong the propaganda is in Fox News and OAN.

And the sad part is that it doesn't matter what I think, it only matters what the people in those swing states they polled think.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

51% of people saying they approved of Trump’s time in office

I think its not that complicated for people. They look at their bank accounts, they look at their wallets, they look at their job prospects and world around them, and they can pretty easily conclude: their lives were better under Trump.

It doesn't matter that Trump had nothing to do with things going well then, and was likely making it worse, because peoples lived experience was that their lives were better. Biden inherited a shitwagon going off a shit cliff. He did turn things around, a bit. But a bit is not enough. People are still suffering. They look at the state of things and think "Well things were better then". Its not a complicated calculus, even if its wrong.

The majority of people aren't watching OAN or Fox news even. They arent watching anything really. Their calculations are very very simple.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You might have missed it, but Trump has already pivoted on Gaza. It happened at neck snapping speeds. He's pivoted to being highly critical of Bibi and is basically telling Israel they need to be done. He's basically trying to be to the left of Biden on Gaza at this point. Now if that would hold up once he's in office.. eh. But that's the rhetoric as of today/ a few hours ago.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I'm also going to speculate Iran's threats to retaliate for the consulate bombing has their attention. Biden doesn't want to start a war with Iran before the election, or at least I hope not

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 56 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think the title is accurate. I don't have access to the full text of the WSJ article, but according to the Guardian

He underscored that an immediate ceasefire is essential to stabilize and improve the humanitarian situation and protect innocent civilians, and he urged the prime minister to empower his negotiators to conclude a deal without delay to bring the hostages home.

Unless I'm missing something, Biden is not demanding a unilateral Israeli cease-fire. The cease-fire is still conditional on the release of the hostages.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 55 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Has anyone told Biden that israel is actively violating a binding UN ceasefire resolution?

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 32 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Haven’t you heard? He threatened them with even harsher threats if they don’t comply this time.

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 19 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I heard he might also get oven more outraged.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

theyre getting dangerously close to seeing him slam his fist on a table

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I hear tabloids might be able to use "stern" if they don't stop immediately.

They added it to the meeting notes right after selling the jets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

While still providing them with weapons the other day.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 7 months ago

That’s the point of my comment.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Several times 2000lb worth of hyprocrisy.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, that particular resolution was for a ceasefire during Ramadan, which is now over. Of course, there other UN resolutions it is violating, and it had violated that one, but to be fair it isn't currently violating it.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I thought there were a few days left.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I thought Biden just had a bunch of people over at the whitehouse for Eid, and some of them stormed out in protest. I thought Eid was the end of Ramadan?

Edit: Here it is. Ah, I thought the iftar meal was the one on Eid, not just a normal sun-down meal.

[–] boyi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 months ago

yeah, should still be binding until early nextly week, around Tuesday.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 27 points 7 months ago

Maybe Biden can write poems and sing songs about how much he wants to genocide to stop.

Words are irrelevant while he continues to send them the tools they use to carry out the genocide.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And if they DON'T then they'll only get a couple HUNDRED world ending Bombs instead of a couple THOUSAND!

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

World ending?

Are they sending nukes?

[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"you better stop using all of those guns and bombs I sold you, or else! Also the high-end fighter jets should be arriving this week, ttyl"

[–] FiniteBanjo 2 points 7 months ago

I know you were joking, and it's still bad, but the jets order is for 5 years from now. Which is longer than sometime this week.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

Strong words are nice, would have been better 6 months ago.

At this point, it’s time to stop sending them more bombs at a minimum. Biden gets on the phone and says this bullshit, then turns around and circumvents Congress to sends billions in bombs anyway. Bibi responds by going in Israeli news media and just dunks on him for being Israel’s lil removed, it’s pathetic.

At a certain point, and maybe we’ve already surpassed this - Biden will lose voters to Trump because Biden’s “Israel First” policy doesn’t sound as good as Trump’s “America First”

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Upon reading this headline, my initial question was “or what?”

Biden has previously signaled that he wouldn’t halt arms shipments to Israel and has said U.S. support for the country in its defense against Hamas is unflinching.

This week, the Biden administration authorized the transfer to Israel of over 1,000 500-pound bombs and over 1,000 small-diameter bombs, U.S. officials said.

Oh.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

NPR noted that even if the US stopped all shipments right now, Israel has enough weapons and munitions to continue on their own for several months.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago (7 children)

So... Why are we sending them weapons?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 10 points 7 months ago

It would still be a clear, powerful message.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

He's still trying to get away with just talkie-talkie (with a wink and a nod) to save his presidency in the upcoming election.

Anybody who is not a commited tribalist and has even the slightest wiff of skepticism is by now, having seen all that Biden has said and done in the last 3 months, well beyond believing mere words from this US Administration: only actual actions (not promises of actions, actually doing it) will even just begin to offset the months of actions in the very opposite direction (including the recent sending of 2000lb bombs to Israel, since those are well known for causing massive civilian casualties when used).

Sanctions on Israel would be a good start.

load more comments
view more: next ›