this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
404 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19170 readers
5592 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A former CIA officer explains how a vast, pro-Putin corruption network uncovered in Europe is a warning sign for the U.S.

Democrats for years have warned about Russian influence in the Republican Party under Donald Trump. But now even some prominent GOP members of Congress are sounding the alarm.

“I think Russian propaganda has made its way into the United States, unfortunately, and it’s infected a good chunk of my party’s base,” Representative Michael McCaul, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told Puck’s Julia Ioffe last week. Representative Mike Turner, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, went further, telling CNN’s Jake Tapper a few days later, “We see directly coming from Russia attempts to mask communications that are anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia messages, some of which we even hear being uttered on the House floor.”

Which Republicans might they be referring to? Representative Ken Buck didn’t hesitate to point a finger at Representative Marjorie Taylor Greenesaying on Monday, “Moscow Marjorie is focused now on this Ukraine issue and getting her talking points from the Kremlin and making sure that she is popular and she is getting a lot of coverage.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 121 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It IS HAPPENING! Been obvious to anyone who pays the slightest attention. Ever since that orange shit stain announced he was running a decade ago, it has been PAINFULLY obvious.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately, there are people who pay excessive and exclusive attention to right-wing media, and repeat the Hitler call of “fake news” (Lügenpresse) at all remaining media.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

McCarthy: There are two people I think Putin pays: Rorabacher and Trump!

Ryan: Shhhhh! We're all family here, right guys? Ha ha. ha ha ha. Ha.

-TWENTY FUCKING SIXTEEN

Yeah "is it happening here" WTF

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 72 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Anyone remember this from almost a decade ago?:

"There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, according to a recording of the June 15, 2016, exchange, which was listened to and verified by The Washington Post. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher is a Californian Republican known in Congress as a fervent defender of Putin and Russia.

This is not at all a new thing.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And that was before others did random trips to Russia

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

On the 4th of July, no less. If it was a book people would hammer that shit for being too unbelievable.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago

Trite as fuck but depressingly real.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 16 points 6 months ago

Specifically: From an article on July 5, 2018, "On Tuesday afternoon, the bipartisan leadership of the Senate Intelligence Committee issued some important findings, concluding that the U.S. intelligence community was correct in its assessment: Russia attacked the U.S. elections in 2016 and did so in the hopes of putting Donald Trump in the White House." And, "In addition to Shelby, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee and has limited foreign policy responsibilities, the official congressional delegation featured Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), and Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas)."

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/seven-gop-lawmakers-make-misguided-trip-russia-msna1119676

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 66 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You know who hasn’t been sounding the alarm?

That’s right, media. You.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Huh, no Fox, Newsmax, OAN or PostMedia on that list.

I wonder why?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I did, thank you for the link

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It would be weird if Republicans did the shit they did and WEREN'T being paid by Russia...

Remember Devin Nunes?

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/intel-revelations-raise-difficult-questions-several-republicans-n1261400

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Oh, the douchebag traitor who got fake dirt on Biden from a russian agent, and now the CEO of the trump media and technology group? Yeah, I remember that filthy traitor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devin_Nunes

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Its agonizing how obvious it is and we just have to sit here like they're honest Americans. Sick of this backwards ass world.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Never heard abut this. Very interesting.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is it happening here too?

Really? Did they ask this question with a straight face?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's actually really shocking for me as a non-American who grew up during the cold war and remembers the shadow of nuclear annihilation hanging over my head, then watching the fall of the Berlin wall then the comparative peace of the latter part of the 90's where the future looked so bright that there is a real chance of senior American politicians being under the thumb of Russia.

It still kinda blows my mind that it might be true.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Might want to remove that, might be true. It is happening and has been happening. The entire GOP is a Russian asset.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 26 points 6 months ago

Gee, that’s a tough one.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Very nearly the entire republican party consists of worthless traitor filth who are wholly owned by one of our two greatest geopolitical adversaries, hell-bent on reversing the outcome of the Cold War. The fuck do you think?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 15 points 6 months ago

hell-bent on reversing the outcome of the Cold War

And the Civil War for that matter.

[–] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

It's been open and blatantly happening for decades. They used to hand out fucking envelopes of cash from the Russian controlled NRA on the fucking floor.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Money is speech now, why shouldn't we be surprised when politicians listen to the ~~highest bidder~~ loudest voices?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Sup regulatory capture and monopolies leading to preventable crises

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago

Obviously. And, since the FBI and CIA don’t seem to care, I assume they are bought too.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s a little late for this realization. They already own most of the Republican Party and the rest is owned by the oligarchs.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I've been saying this for a while, and hoping the CIA / FBI are on top of this.

[–] BoxerDevil@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't buy what you have already bought

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Why wouldn't they, we're for sale

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

It has been happening here since 2012. 2016 election was the result of that program and not the beginning.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Already has. You have only to watch and read the jaded media to see it

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

“Bought” would be correct for us. Already happened.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I don't know, but this article from 6 years ago says "no fucking shit Sherlock, fucking duh"

[–] zik@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

You mean aside from the ex-president?

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Most of the GOP

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Isn’t it ok for there to be foreign influence in Congress? I mean, no one seems to bat an eye that Israel openly supports so many politicians, why should it be bad for Russia to support politicians as well? /s

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Generally it is bad if it is an adversary. However modern Russia is unfortunately a matched pair for the Republican party, christian ethno-nationalists with dictator leadership.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They already bought the GOP. If they are still shopping for politicians, maybe Moscow can create stable politics in the US...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, it's buying presidents

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Don't cut them short, they've openly owned segments of the republican party for over 6 years.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 5 points 6 months ago

No, of course no, yours are leased and subleased --sarcasm

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why is there a photo of Ron Perlman?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

And the picture is of Marge the uber-Karen.

load more comments
view more: next ›