This is from a European view and while not the US the political spectrum suffers from the same problem.
What some Canadians consider left is only relative.
So this is your 'liberal' party?:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/12/30/cypl-d30.html
And it's a simple verifiable fact that voters decide on the goverment, so maybe it's only in your mind that they're not right-wingers.
Maybe it's an uncomfortable truth?
https://www.president.pl/news/this-is-one-of-the-most-tragic-and-painful-pages-of-polish-history-during-world-war-ii,36759
So maybe you don’t seem to understand what the word means.
How did these monsters find the time while they were busy also trying to genocide jews and Russians. IDC that they die, doesn't mean I can't hate the fascist US supporting them or any other horrible side on the planet.
There is definitely something to criticise in Russia.
Very conservative and right-wing. But this is a case of the lesser evil.
Against the imperialist US mass murderers and a fascist-infested proxy there is no contest.
And the west is lucky Putin is in charge, he has some restraint and brains. Unlike that loose cannon Trump or some warmongering EU vazal screamers. I know plenty Russians criticise him for being too soft and if he gets replaced thing would get ugly fast.
Other politicians are more hardline and will not show mercy or fight with velvet gloves, as is the case now.
See, both sides of your uniparty can be equally nasty racists.
The discussion is about your banana republic and they decide it's time for some sinophobia for no reason.
They are better of than your washed up shithole, that's for sure.
I'm Belgian, Poles are good US fascist bootlickers now despite that they also were genocided by the ukrofascists.
And exactly, Musk satelites working for their proxy and Trump keeps arming the Banderites against Russia.
Those are indisputable facts, not the idiotic and debunked 'Russian asset' BS created for US political purpose by the fascist-lite party.
I am going to answer here since you are reasonable unlike the others and I got banned by the mods.
Anything that Trump doesn't like must be automatically good in their kneejerk binary reaction.
And they will defend it dogmatically with all means possible and without scepticism.
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/06/11/meet-wikipedias-ayn-rand-loving-founder-and-wikimedia-foundations-regime-change-operative-ceo/
https://www.dw.com/en/attempted-manipulation-on-wikipedia/video-16628135 https://wikipedia.fivefilters.org/agenda.html
And you wonder about cherrypicking?
That was literally the entirety of your reply.
You cherrypick citogenesis of ten points to criticise.
If you really were 'open minded enough' you could find at least useful info in the other points.
Such as their links to Google trough sponsoring and partnerships.
Or:
*At time of writing, out of a total.of 5.72 million articles, Wikipedia has.....
~195,000 articles that need references (i.e. they have none)
~337,000 articles that need more references
~69,000 articles that need reliable references*
You could bother to look at other threads or other websites online.