Neat! Hopefully I can get in on the beta but even if I can't I look forward to trying it out!
This pen / pencil thing has been corrected so many times for so many decades that it's ludicrous people are still bringing it up.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-nasa-spen/
Random bits of pencil lead floating around in a high tech environment is such a poor idea that even the Soviet's quit using pencils once Fisher's Space Pen was available. A pen which Fisher itself paid to develop and then sold to both NASA and the Soviet Space Program.
They met at a party
According to this article in DM she's on camera stumbling around the city streets so drunk that should couldn't stay upright and that's where she ran into this guy. Of course that article also says this happened at "quarter to five at night." which makes no sense.
See, Republicans have been raiding Social Security for petty cash for decades...
That's a popular opinion but it's not supported by any reputable source I can find.
"Fixing" Social Security can be done pretty simple by just raising the taxable income limit. That could be done at any time but of course Congress is about as useful as wet toilet paper so nothing will happen until it's a pants on fire emergency.
I’ve been hearing a lot about how unreliable the F-35s have been with it being hard to even get them off the ground half the time due to the maintenance needed on them.
The F-35 requires roughly the same amount of mmh / fh as the Gripen, exclusive of engine and air-frame. What's been hampering the readiness rate of the F-35, which is below that of the Gripen, is the lack of maintenance depots. This was always going to happen because Lockheed planned from the beginning to sell the planes first and build the maintenance depots later. The F-35 sold so well that it outstripped the capacity to build the maintenance depots which created a lack of on-hand parts and technicians. This is turning around and readiness rates are improving as Lockheed slowly gets caught creating maintenance yards.
The Gripen has lower sales (that's not a knock on it) which made it easier for Saab to keep up on the maintenance side. They also try to get maintenance depots setup simultaneous with deliveries. IMO they've done a better job of managing things.
Finland officially closes its last coal power plant, reduces reliance on coal for power generation below 1% four years ahead of schedule
Meh, the politicians can say whatever they want. The Market talks a lot louder.
Coal production in the United States is down 60% from it's peak in 2008 (1172 vs 526). In that same time frame Wind Power is up from 55 Tw/h to 425Tw/h and Solar Power is up from 864Gw/h to 164,502Gw/h.
We still have a long ways to go but there's been massive changes in the last 15 years.
You should also be changing with time to take advantage of such technological growth.
Whoo boy that's funny, thanks for the chuckle. I've been technology professional so long that I literally predate NAT. To say that I've changed with the time would be an understatement.
TVs are admittedly geared towards single wide screen tasks like the obvious: media consumption.
Huh, media consumption. You mean like Lemmy or any other web media?
That’s what additional monitors can be used for; but the point is with a single wide monitor you don’t have to run a second monitor.
Here's where we diverge and despite considering the issue for several hours now I'm still not sure if this is a generational issue or something else. Obviously I'm from the time before widescreen and it looks like to me like you're trying to use a workaround (multiple windows on a single screen) to justify what is objectively a downgrade in display technology.
You are in essence saying "Yes I know the monitor doesn't have enough vertical space but you are supposed to use the extra horizontal space to overcome that." I am going to counter by saying that computer monitors shouldn't be 16x9, that's a TV / Movie format forced into the computer industry by display makers who wanted to leverage their investment in television panels to produce cheap computer monitors. In short you are forcing yourself to find ways to work around display tech that doesn't fit the use case; the screen is wider than it needs to be while not being tall enough.
Amusingly I was discussing this with a peer about an hour ago and he brought up ultra wide monitors like the Samsung Odyssey QD-OLED G9 (5120x1440) and after looking at it we decided that a monitor with the same physical width (48") but double the physical height (20" vs 40") and double the horizontal resolution (2880) would be near perfect. With such a monitor there would be so much real estate that app windows would stay large enough to be readable while still being capable of displaying lots of data vertically.
You could mount one vertically, you could use different sized displays, you could stack them.
Ahhh, now we hit the rub. I do a lot of remote GUI work and what I'm dropping into expects widescreen and uses all of it. Downscaling that into an app window makes the problem worse because it leaves large areas unused horizontally and there's still not enough vertical. I could flip a monitor to portrait but then it's too narrow to be handled correctly because what was a lack of vertical resolution has now become a lack of horizontal resolution. This is another symptom of 16:19 being a bad aspect ratio for computer displays.
Be your own person.
This person is seriously considering a pair of frameless ultra widescreen displays in a vertical stack. Expensive AF but potentially oh so usable.
You do you with multiple app windows squished to fit into today's displays. If it works for you then it works for you.
Enjoy your day.
It's similar to using Deep Freeze on Windows where outside of specific writeable directories anything that shouldn't be changed isn't allowed to change.