CindyTheSkull

joined 3 years ago
[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In a society that rewards greed and punishes empathy while grinding everyone into abject alienation from their labor, from their communities, from each other, and from themselves, it's no surprise that so many people get molded into self-serving, willfully ignorant, insufferable pricks. It's a feature of a capitalist society, not a bug. Capitalism cultivates and nurtures the worst aspects of human nature while trying to snuff out or at best twist the good and positive traits of our social species. There's nothing wrong with hating the innumerable shitty people who have adapted to this mode of production by becoming shit people, so long as you don't ever think they represent the "inherent" state of humanity or lead you to hate humanity as a whole. Don't let that rational, understandable hatred of people as they are now, adapted under capitalism, dissuade you from seeing the beautiful potential for a loving, healthy humanity as it would be when adapted to communism.

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago (8 children)

You've been pretending to be principled and honorable (not to mention above it all) with talk of how terrible it is to "pass judgment without asking questions." Then you go on to use a working person's struggle to pay rent and avoid homelessness as a means to hurt them. All because they dared to find some humor in how ridiculous your comment was.

That is more than enough for anyone here to conclude without further questioning that you're not the good, noble person you're pretending to be. You're shallow and petty. It doesn't surprise me in the least that you would comment on a post like this in an attempt make excuses for your fascist-abetting spouse.

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In an ideal hexbear world, we would be as serious and active about banning anti-vegans as we have recently (and thankfully) decided to be about banning misogynists.

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 3 points 8 months ago

I guess I'm just worried we're falling in the same trap of painting all Israelis as bloodthirsty monsters - instead of acknowledging that some of them are just normal people that have been duped by the Zionist state into committing atrocities against their fellow humans and that black and white thinking only serves to uphold this cycle of hatred. (literal example from this very thread)

Duped into committing atrocities. Duped into committing atrocities. Those poor saps were just mislead into committing crimes against humanity, literal torture upon children. Your logic here is that we shouldn't paint them all as bloodthirsty monsters since some of them were "duped" into being... well, bloodthirsty monsters. Regardless of how they arrived there, that still makes them bloodthirsty monsters!

You are what you do. It doesn't matter whether or not someone was "duped" into believing the obvious lie that a Palestinian's life isn't worth as much as theirs, or that they were "duped" into committing (or even just supporting) atrocities. They still did those things. Those who were the victims of those atrocities are no less victims, no better off just because one or two of the perpetrators were "duped" into mercilessly murdering entire families. At this point, anyone who identifies as an Israeli but who is not actively fighting against Zionism and all who support it then they well deserve the title of bloodthirsty monster. They deserve far worse than just a label, honestly.

So no, we're not "falling in to the same trap" of painting with too broad of a brush, we're recognizing actual material reality. We're recognizing the material consequences of Zionism and correctly concluding what must happen to Zionism itself. This isn't black and white thinking, to the contrary it is recognizing the very real nuances that differentiate the colonizers from the colonized, and it is doing so without falling into the idealist trap that you have that leads down the same road as "well those Nazi concentration camp guards, hey some of them were just normal people trying to make the best of a bad situation." As usual, the problem is not that we as communists are failing to see that these monsters are human too, it's the liberal who fails to see that "normal humans" can and do become monsters. And whether or not one did so with giddy abandon or because their mind was already rotted to the extent that they believed (were "duped" by) propaganda telling them that they were righteous for trying to wipe out all Palestinian children, it doesn't fucking matter. Functionally, they are monsters.

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Outside of dedicated trans spaces made specifically for that sole purpose, Hexbear stands out as the most welcoming, inclusive, and protective community for trans people I've ever encountered online.

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago

The only thing i'm guilty of is being rude to a dipshit

What you're guilty of is having a political view contrary to that of the US State Dept.

You can be rude and sexualize people to your heart's content, all day long and in every comment you make and you'll get scores of upvotes and redditism accolades. You just have to direct it towards the reddit-logo-approved bad guys.

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago

They'll blame it on Mexico this time around.

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're taking it too literally. It's metaphorical. No one thinks China has AI robots doing laundry any more than they think AI is physical robots in the US using a paintbrush and physical easel to do art. Well... I'm sure some burgerbrains exist who think that, but you know what I mean. (Edit: turns out I don't know how to spell easel).

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did Japan's real estate bubble crash heavily during those times?

The US reined in their vassals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaza_Accord

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

A few months ago ublock origin wasn't working for a subset of users (that youtube was using to test features that would break ublock origin for everyone). Ublock had to do make changes to counter youtubes efforts. They did so successfully and became an even more robust ad blocker than before. If they had not, we all would have been seeing ads break through months back.

My point is that it is an arms race and so far ublock (and other ad blockers, though ublock consistently proves the best) has been able to keep ahead for the most part. I don't know for sure if this is the moment when youtube starts to pull in front, obviously I hope not. But even if they do, that doesn't mean ublock will be permanently broken. Even if ads got through for you today, it doesn't necessarily mean they will tomorrow. We'll see.

[–] CindyTheSkull@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Yes, it's really best just not to bring your phone at all but if you must, like for emergencies, or you need it beforehand and then for some reason have no place to stash it then a Faraday container can come in very handy. It's also not 100% fool proof but if used right will prevent any signals from outside reaching your phone or any signals from your phone going out (as mentioned, you can not trust airplane mode.) There are DIY guides online for making your own.

 

I have a few lib family members who are well-meaning and actually open to challenges to their preconceptions. They consider themselves anti-war, even did anti-war activism during the Iraq war and state that their primary concern with respect to the Russia-Ukraine situation is for the well-being of the Ukrainian civilians. They even recognized the racism happening at the borders and were appalled by it. They are boomers, but they're actually not too bad as boomers go.

However, they are avid CNN-watchers and so that is their perspective on this conflict. I feel like it is my duty (whether that's true or not) to at least attempt to give them an accurate view of the truth about what's happening in Ukraine and some of the very important context around it. I would like to think I can get through to them, but I am terrible about talking about this kind of thing. I stumble, I completely forget everything pertinent, and instead of making a good case for my view, I end up making it look foolish instead.

I'm slightly better in writing, so I've decided to attempt to compile a very broad, general, absolutely NOT comprehensive list of the distortions, lies, and overall false narrative that the US/NATO and the West generally are pushing via CNN. The plan is to make a bulleted list of the overall major distortions and then populate each section with "sub-lists" that contain specific examples. I've started on a very very rough draft of the broad list that I'll put inside a spoiler tag at the bottom of this post. I have been saving a lot of what gets posted in the Russia-Ukraine megathreads, from links to important tweets, to links to articles, to some of the many examples of MSM suppression of info, to even quotes I liked from fellow Hexbears. But it's all just a jumbled mess right now, but that's why I'm going to try to make this list. You know how the megathread has the "Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict"? I want to do something like that, but on the much broader topic of "Examples of the false narrative being created and the actual realities contradicting it." I know it sounds like a massive undertaking, but I figure it's only a matter of how detailed it is.

I have a few questions for you all. First, are there any good web tools for making this list? I know I can make a personal wiki but I've never done that before. It looks like there are several options for this, so are there opinions here as to which one would be best? Or is using a wiki overkill? Maybe I should just do it in a document file.

But that leads me to my next question: Does anyone want to help? I don't mean to ask others to do my research work for me, but I also thought that some of you might enjoy working on something like this, and that maybe if it were a group effort (and not just my personal shitty compilation) it might even end up being a helpful resource for other people to use as reference or maybe even in their attempts to deworm the libs in their lives. Is this a silly request? I know there has been interest in doing something like this, and I would love to have the help. Actually here is a thread about that started by @MaoistLandlord a while ago in the R-U megathread and I see it come up often, I just happened to have that one bookmarked. So I'm just tossing this out here just in case anyone wants to use it as a jumping off point for something more comprehensive than my little project, but I don't mean to be presumptuous.

Obviously, if this were to be a group thing, it would be up to whoever was working on it to decide what kind of list or structure it would be. If it's just me, I'm not going to commit a ton of time to it, and it's going to be what I described above: just very basic list, with major bullet points of what CNN is not talking about for the sake of the false narrative, and some examples beneath each bullet point. It's only going to be a way to structure some of the stuff I've saved from the megathread and present it to my libs so they have a better view.

Here's what I have so far as the super rough draft I just typed up in 10 minutes of only the broad points and in no real order. What am I missing? What did I get wrong?

spoilerObviously there's a lot of overlap, but what can you do.

  • This is a proxy war between the US (NATO is essentially an alliance for the interests of the US) and Russia. It is not an invasion on the whim of a maniac.

  • The Ukrainian government is heavily infiltrated and influenced by literal Nazis and the military is lead by Nazis and made up of entire Nazi battalions that have been funded and trained by the US for years.

  • The violence now has been an ongoing issue ever since the US-backed coup in 2014 and the Nazi government and military have been shelling the eastern part of Ukraine ever since, as well as going in and committing hate crimes.

  • NATO (which was created as a military alliance against the USSR but did not disband when the USSR fell, but instead continued to treat Russia as a threat despite Russia's many capitulations) has repeatedly promised Russia it would not expand, has denied Russia's request to actually join NATO as well.

  • The Ukrainian military has been committing atrocities against its own people and blaming it on Russia, including shooting civilians who try to escape to safety instead of stay and fight. (a list of atrocities - as in, the types of atrocities being committed would be helpful here, of course a list of specific instances would end up being a book in itself) They are hiding themselves and arms in schools and hospitals and using civilians as meat shields.

  • The Ukrainian government has been putting out massive amounts of ridiculous propaganda in a bid to try to get the US/NATO to do more, despite the almost certainty that further US/NATO intervention would lead to a WWIII scenario. Sub list of some of the most ridiculous or egregious propaganda would be good - ghost of Kiev obviously.

  • The US and western media in general is parading this propaganda as truth to an astounding degree. More importantly, it is suppressing any information that remotely goes against the prevailing narrative for the purpose of manufacturing consent for its own support and gearing up for a new col war with Russia. (sub-list of egregious examples of suppression, perhaps even a sub-sub list of likely false flag events like the fire at the nuclear power plant - honestly I'm not sure what category to put that under, same with all the info about western volunteers going over there and the things that have been reported by them.)

  • Putin is not a Communist (he is a Capitalist through and through), does not want to reform the USSR, and Russia is not at all a communist country.

  • Zelensky is not a good guy but a war criminal for a number of reasons (again a sub-list here would be good) but includes not allowing men below the age of 60 to leave the country (hence the Nazi contingents murdering those who try), handing out weapons to everyone even when they don't know how to use them (leading to citizens killing each other both by accident/misidentification as well as outright murders of each other as in revenge killings and interfactional violence)

  • There has been shocking anti-Russian sentiment from violence to banning of ordinary innocent Russian people from participating in society throughout the West (another sub-list here) and it is being hailed as a good thing by western media.

  • While this fits under the propaganda parts, it's worth it's own big bullet point: Ukraine is NOT winning the war, Russia is NOT incompetent and doing poorly. Russia WILL absolutely win, no question, unless NATO decides to intervene further, and we should NOT want this to happen unless we want to edge close to and possibly cross the line into the annihilation of humanity.

  • It is also worth stating that “winning” and “losing” does not mean in reality how it is being portrayed, specifically considering what Russia’s goals actually are. It is almost certainly not Russia’s goal to completely occupy Ukraine or literally make it part of Russia itself, but 1. to ensure the sovereignty and freedom of the the former areas of Ukraine that have been under violent attack by the Ukrainian military since 2014, the LPR and DPR (aka Donbas region) as well as Crimea, 2. the demilitarizing (and “denazifying”) Ukraine and 3. The absolute prevention of Ukraine joining NATO. If those objectives are accomplished, Russia will have “won.”

  • Zelensky and the Ukrainian government have had multiple talks with Russia, each was an opportunity to do the right thing and surrender. This would save innumerable lives. Instead, Zelensky makes ridiculous demands and perpetuates the violence. Whether this is for vanity, for a (hopefully) misplaced idea that NATO will intervene and "save" him, or if he correctly or not thinks that surrender would mean the ultranationalist elements in his own government would assassinate him*, it is utterly selfish. (*include example of official who was shot in the head for supposedly potentially giving information to the Russians)


view more: next ›