HM05_Me

Gallaudet brings a much needed additional perspective to the discussion. We have Grusch speaking of special access programs with recovered UAP, Fravor and Graves speaking of military and commercial pilot sightings, Schumer and others from Congress with access to military and intel briefings, and Gallaudet with oceanic and atmospheric data. That's just a few of the recent names involved in a push for disclosure. Add in public and individual experiences over the years and it's clear that there is a phenomenon occurring that deserves investigation and answers.

That stood out to me too. Given Nell’s roles over the years, it’s likely he’d have more access and potentially direct access to some of the programs previously mentioned by David Grusch. If that is the case, then he may be limited in what he can publicly discuss.

I’d definitely like to know what convinced him and what drives him to push for disclosure. Though, I can understand side stepping the question for this event. Today’s discussion didn’t seem to be geared to expanding on what’s currently out there for information on UAP and NHI. Rather, it was likely aimed at bringing the topic to a new audience.

Hopefully we hear more from Nell and others soon, along with more info to solidify their claims.

I've known his stance on the topic, but it's still amazing to hear someone with his background stating that.

David Grusch had originally been scheduled for this event, but I'm happy that Knell spoke in his place. I'm also glad that he listed off other names that have spoken out on NHI and UAP. At this point it feels like an open secret in government and the military that just needs a little more push to get officially addressed.

“So, non-human intelligence exists, non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity. This interaction is not new, and it's been ongoing, and unelected people in the government are aware of that." "There's zero doubt." Colonel Karl Nell speaking at SALT on UAP, NHI and the state of disclosure.

Tim Burchett joined The Hill to discuss his new bill to declassify all UAP related documents. He also briefly touches on other events, such as a Tic-Tac sighting by a pilot and a former Admiral's claims of a football field sized object traveling over 200 mph under water.

Definitely a good question and one there doesn't seem to be a solid answer too. Also, some of the suggested speeds of UAP should be creating shock waves, whereas they're typically silent and have no discernible impact on their surroundings. It's as if they're not truly occupying the space they're in. Suggestions I've seen are that they're moving outside our known/perceived dimensions or using a means of warping gravity and essentially displacing their surroundings.

One of the key things about tracking UAP seems to be narrowing down the spectrums at which they can be observed. Infrared seems to be more frequently reported for visual detection and there are specific radio frequencies they're detected at. Even a presentation by AARO highlighted signatures that they're often detected at.

I think events like the UAP over Langley AFB and the UAP engaged by military over North America last year should have more coverage than they've had. There is a clear presence of objects of unknown origin that even our own military is concerned about. It should be an issue that bridges beliefs of what the objects are and where they come from. Whether they're drones, NHI, or you name it, there is something engaging military bases and even interrupting military exercises. Unfortunately, the stigma on this subject can easily silence the news.

I agree. There are a few semi-regulars on here, though it definitely pales compared to a certain other platform. Lemmy is a great site, but niche communities can have trouble taking off. I try to keep an eye out for news or informative articles to post and occasionally those posts take off. UAP is a topic that has a lot of interest, but getting user engagement is a different story.

Please explain the harm in what has been done so far in congress regarding UAP? The primary goal so far has been to get oversight of programs that have been over classified over decades that not congress or even the president have been aware of. Regardless of what the programs have been about, alien or not, they’re getting budgeting with absolutely no oversight.

You’re also putting a lot of words in my mouth. No where am I suggesting to take anyone by their word without researching the topic yourself. I sure don’t. If you trust any politician without second thought then you’re setting yourself up for disappointment.

I agree with the analogy, but not in your conclusion. Those were often animals that were misidentified. Even in your analogy you cite something observed that deserves research. Should we have ignored tales of mermaids and folk creatures that lead to the identification and study of new animals? I think it's absurd to say that you should ignore something because you view it as a tall tale. I'm simply saying to let people speculate and let science determine what truth is.

I'm not quite sure Chuck Schumer believes in Jesus. I know you're just making an edgy comment, but do you really believe that people should be disregarded just for having a religious view? These are people are working off of reports from the intelligence community and DoD. This is a bipartisan issue being addressed in both the House and Senate. When members of the Gang of Eight have expressed concern over UAP then the topic at least deserves review.