Joncash2

joined 2 years ago
[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (8 children)

Well, as Kallas says, it's to go after China next.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihQTS1RC50A

So, after that statement, I honestly can't imagine China having more clarity on supporting Russia.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (10 children)

China's just talking about stopping Russia. Which the EU keeps saying it's the top priority. They're willing to spend billions to do it. China's saying you can save all that money, totally your choice. It's easy for me.

Edit see we are talking about different clarity. Europe has none. China has all of it.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -1 points 17 hours ago (12 children)

I'm clear. The EU talks about wanting to stop Russia, but doesn't actually work with the partner that can stop Russia. That's as clear as it gets.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -1 points 17 hours ago (14 children)

That was a paper talking about history. That it started before Obama even. Though, as the wiki article states at a minimum it started with Obama. Also, why would Russia lose? The implied threat is your going to be facing down J20s if it gets bad enough.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (19 children)

At least since Obama.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_foreign_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration

Here's an EU based article saying that really it's been happening since Clinton.

https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/25139

Always as in before anyone currently in power was in power.

Now, China is just saying what your thinking. If EU isn't supporting USA on this, we can talk. Otherwise what do we gain from not keeping Russia afloat?

Edit btw the point of all of this is China is literally telling the EU how to stop the war. Turn on the US

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

If you told me a year ago I would be doing this constantly I would have said your insane. Yet here we are ...

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago

Yeah, he should have said mad max looking trucks. Because that's where we actually are with this nightmare.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, but the what in the goddamn fuck is spread through so many scientific fields.

Who: biology What: chemistry When: physics Where: geology, archeology Why? Philosophy

All these fields just because the universe exists. kind of beautiful if you ask me.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Facts don't care about your feelings. But you'd think one with opinions such as your own when shown how binary their thinking is, might want to not be so binary. That or stop telling others not to be binary when they can't stop being binary themselves.

view more: ‹ prev next ›